Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effect of Tissue Adhesive on Surgical Site Infection Following Elective Bariatric Surgery: a Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The reported incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) following bariatric surgery ranges from 1.4 to 30%. The use of skin staples and tissue adhesive was shown to be superior to sutures in reducing SSI in a variety of surgical disciplines; however, this area is under-investigated in elective bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of tissue adhesive for skin closure on SSI in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed to determine the incidence of SSI in patients who underwent elective laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Tissue adhesive was selectively used for skin closure during the study period. Patient characteristics, operative data, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were collected from patient charts and the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database.

Results

A total of 1,579 patients were included in the study. Tissue adhesive was used in 31.2% of all operations (n = 494). The rate of incisional SSI in our study was 2.2% (n = 35). The use of tissue adhesive was more common in patients who developed incisional SSI compared with those without incisional SSI (54.3 vs. 30.8%, p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, the use of tissue adhesive remained an independent predictor for the development of incisional SSI (OR 2.77, p = 0.007).

Conclusion

The use of tissue adhesive was an independent predictor for incisional SSI following elective bariatric surgery. This is the first study to report the effects of tissue adhesive in this patient population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fried M, Yumuk V, Oppert JM, Scopinaro N, Torres A, Weiner R, Yashkov Y, Frühbeck G. International federation for surgery of obesity and metabolic disorders-European chapter (IFSO-EC); European association for the study of obesity (EASO); European association for the study of obesity management task force (EASO OMTF). Interdisciplinary European guidelines on metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2014; 24(1):42–55.

  2. Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, et al. National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. Lancet. 2011;377(9765):557–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Obesity. 2013;21 Suppl 1:S1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aminian A, Jamal MH, Andalib A, et al. Is laparoscopic bariatric surgery a safe option in extremely high-risk morbidly obese patients? J Laparoendosc Adv Su Tech A. 2015;25(9):707–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Encinosa WE, Bernard DM, Du D, et al. Recent improvements in bariatric surgery outcomes. Med Care. 2009;47(5):531–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blackburn GL, Hutter MM, Harvey AM, et al. Expert panel on weight loss surgery: executive report update. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17(5):842–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ban KA, Minei JP, Laronga C, et al. American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: surgical site infection guidelines, 2016 Update. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(1):59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, et al. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992;13(10):606–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Badia JM, Casey AL, Petrosillo N, et al. Impact of surgical site infection on healthcare costs and patient outcomes: a systematic review in six European countries. J Hosp Infect. 2017;96(1):1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dang JT, Tran C, Switzer N, et al. Predicting surgical site infections following laparoscopic bariatric surgery: development of the BariWound tool using the MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(4):1802–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shope TR, Cooney RN, McLeod J, et al. Early results after laparoscopic gastric bypass: EEA vs GIA stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis. Obes Surg. 2003;13(3):355–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2000;232(4):515–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Finks JF, Carlin A, Share D, et al. Effect of surgical techniques on clinical outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass--results from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(3):284–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shabino PJ, Khoraki J, Elegbede AF, et al. Reduction of surgical site infections after laparoscopic gastric bypass with circular stapled gastrojejunostomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chopra T, Zhao JJ, Alangaden G, et al. Preventing surgical site infections after bariatric surgery: value of perioperative antibiotic regimens. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10(3):317–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Scott GR, Carson CL, Borah GL. Dermabond skin closures for bilateral reduction mammaplasties: a review of 255 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(6):1460–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Basaran M, Kafali E, Ugurlucan M, et al. Cyanoacrylate gluing increases the effectiveness of systemic antimicrobial treatment in sternal infection: experimental study in a rodent model. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;56(1):28–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Devika S, Jeyaseelan L, Sebastian G. Analysis of sparse data in logistic regression in medical research: a newer approach. J Postgrad Med. 2016;62(1):26–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huemer GM, Schmidt M, Helml GH, et al. Effective wound closure with a new two-component wound closure device (Prineo™) in excisional body-contouring surgery: experience in over 200 procedures. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2012;36(2):382–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly BD, Lundon DJ, Timlin ME, et al. Paediatric sutureless circumcision--an alternative to the standard technique. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012;28(3):305–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Greene D, Koch RJ, Goode RL. Efficacy of octyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue glue in blepharoplasty. A prospective controlled study of wound-healing characteristics. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999;1(4):292–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller AG, Swank ML. Dermabond efficacy in total joint arthroplasty wounds. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39(10):476–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Singer AJ, Quinn JV, Clark RE, et al. Closure of lacerations and incisions with octylcyanoacrylate: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 2002;131(3):270–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Switzer EF, Dinsmore RC, North Jr JH. Subcuticular closure versus Dermabond: a prospective randomized trial. Am Surg. 2003;69(5):434–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Freeman JT, Anderson DJ, Hartwig MG, et al. Surgical site infections following bariatric surgery in community hospitals: a weighty concern? Obes Surg. 2011;21(7):836–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Winfield RD, Reese S, Bochicchio K, et al. Obesity and the risk for surgical site infection in abdominal surgery. Am Surg. 2016;82(4):331–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Thelwall S, Harrington P, Sheridan E, et al. Impact of obesity on the risk of wound infection following surgery: results from a nationwide prospective multicentre cohort study in England. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(11):1008.e1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27(2):97–132. quiz 3-4; discussion 96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect. 2013;14(1):73–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berrios-Torres SI, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(Suppl 2):S66–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy D. Jackson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fecso, A.B., Maeda, A., Duggal, S. et al. The Effect of Tissue Adhesive on Surgical Site Infection Following Elective Bariatric Surgery: a Retrospective Cohort Study. OBES SURG 31, 2988–2993 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05332-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05332-x

Keywords

Navigation