Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass on Haematinics, Vitamin D and Parathyroid Hormone Levels: a Comparison Between 150 and 200 cm Bilio-Pancreatic Limbs

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

There is little data on the effect of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) on haematinics, vitamin D and parathyroid hormone levels. It is further unclear if an OAGB with a bilio-pancreatic limb (BPL) of 150 cm (OAGB-150) would deliver better outcomes than that with a BPL of 200 cm (OAGB-200).

Materials and Methods

We investigated our records to obtain information on patients who underwent an OAGB-200 or OAGB-150 until 31st July 2018 in our unit.

Results

A total of 405 patients underwent either an OAGB-200 (n = 234) or OAGB-150 (n = 171). The mean age was 46 ± 10.98 years and 276 (68.1%) were females. The mean preoperative weight and the body mass index (BMI) were 139 ± 29.96 kg and 49 ± 8.14 kg/m2 respectively. With OAGB-200, there was a significant increase in anaemia rates at 1 and 2 years compared to preoperative levels with a significant fall in haemoglobin levels. After OAGB-150, there was a significant fall in haemoglobin levels at 1 and 2 years but the increase in anaemia rate was only significant at 2 years. There was a significant increase in PTH levels and the number of abnormal values at 1 and 2 years with OAGB-200. With OAGB-150, PTH changes were significant at 2 years only.

Conclusion

We found that both OAGB-200 and OAGB-150 are associated with a significant increase in anaemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Our findings should prompt the evaluation of supplementation protocols with higher dosages than we recommend for iron, folate and calcium. Consideration should also be given to evaluating shorter BPL lengths than 150 cm with OAGB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11(3):276–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Parmar CD, Mahawar KK. One Anastomosis (Mini) Gastric bypass is now an established bariatric procedure: a systematic review of 12,807 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2956–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carbajo MA, Luque-de-León E, Jiménez JM, et al. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1153–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haddad A, Fobi M, Bashir A, et al. Outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass in the IFSO Middle East North Africa (MENA) region. Obes Surg. 2019;29(8):2409–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahawar K. Care for patients who have undergone one anastomosis gastric bypass surgery. British J Nurs (Mark Allen Publishing). 2019;28(3):157–60.

  6. De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28(5):1188–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, 22andomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wei JH, Lee WJ, Chong K, et al. High incidence of secondary hyperparathyroidism in bariatric patients: comparing different procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):798–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Madhok BM, Mahawar KK, Hadfield JN, et al. Haematological indices and haematinic levels after mini gastric bypass: a matched comparison with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Clin Obes. 2018;8(1):43–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall J, Hall M. Guyton and Hall textbook of medical physiology, vol. 33. 14th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2021. p. 444–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shokrgozar N, Golafshan HA. Molecular perspective of iron uptake, related diseases, and treatments. Blood Res. 2019;54(1):10–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahuja A, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. MGB-OAGB: effect of biliopancreatic limb length on nutritional deficiency, weight loss, and comorbidity resolution. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3439–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyle M, Mahawar K. One anastomosis gastric bypass performed with a 150-cm biliopancreatic limb delivers weight loss outcomes similar to those with a 200-cm biliopancreatic limb at 18 -24 months. Obes Surg. 2020 Apr;30(4):1258–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khalaj A, Kalantar Motamedi MA, Mousapour P, et al. Protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one-anastomosis-mini-gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB): case series from the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS). Obes Surg. 2019;29(6):1714–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahawar KK, Parmar C, Carr WRJ, et al. Impact of biliopancreatic limb length on severe protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(1):37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jedamzik J, Eilenberg M, Felsenreich DM, et al. Impact of limb length on nutritional status in one-anastomosis gastric bypass: 3-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(4):476–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahawar K. We should now study bilio-pancreatic limb of 100 cm with one anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04952-z.

  18. Baig SJ, Priya P, Mahawar KK. Shah S; Indian Bariatric Surgery Outcome Reporting (IBSOR) Group. Weight regain after bariatric surgery-a multicentre study of 9617 patients from Indian Bariatric Surgery Outcome Reporting Group. Obes Surg. 2019;29(5):1583–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Kane M, Parretti HM, Pinkney J, et al. British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society Guidelines on perioperative and postoperative biochemical monitoring and micronutrient replacement for patients undergoing bariatric surgery-2020 update. Obes Rev. 2020;21(11):e13087. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13087.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Luger M, Kruschitz R, Langer F, et al. Effects of omega-loop gastric bypass on vitamin D and bone metabolism in morbidly obese bariatric patients. Obes Surg. 2015 Jun;25(6):1056–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MS, MP, EP and MB collected the data. IO helped with data analysis and wrote most of the manuscript. KM conceived the study, analysed the data and wrote parts of the manuscript. All authors have seen the final manuscript and approve of it.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Islam Omar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

For this type of study formal ethical approval is not needed.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

Not applicable for an audit of a routine procedure in our unit.

Statement of Informed Consent

Informed consent does not apply.

Conflict of Interest

KM has been paid honoraria by Ethicon ®, Medtronic ®, Gore ®, Olympus® and various NHS Trusts for educational activities on one anastomosis gastric bypass. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omar, I., Sam, M.A., Pegler, M.E. et al. Effect of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass on Haematinics, Vitamin D and Parathyroid Hormone Levels: a Comparison Between 150 and 200 cm Bilio-Pancreatic Limbs. OBES SURG 31, 2954–2961 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05281-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05281-5

Keywords

Navigation