Skip to main content
Log in

Disinhibition and Subjective Hunger as Mediators Between Weight Bias Internalization and Binge Eating Among Pre-Surgical Bariatric Patients

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Weight bias internalization, or the process of applying negative weight-related attitudes and beliefs to oneself, is an important construct in regard to patients pursuing bariatric surgery. Weight bias internalization (or internalized weight bias) has been previously associated with depressive symptoms and binge eating among pre-surgical bariatric patients. However, a gap in the literature exists pertaining to how certain eating behaviors may mediate the relationship between weight bias internalization and binge eating. The present study assessed the role of eating behaviors (i.e., cognitive restraint, disinhibition, and hunger) as mediators between weight bias internalization and binge eating symptoms when controlling for depression.

Materials and Methods

A total of 708 adults (Mage = 42.91; White = 95.3%; women = 79.4%) seeking bariatric surgery at a tertiary academic medical center in the Appalachia region of the USA were included in this retrospective study. Patients completed validated measures of weight bias internalization, eating behaviors, and depression as part of a routine, psychological evaluation in order to determine surgical clearance.

Results

Disinhibition and hunger were significant mediators in the relationship between weight bias internalization and binge eating beyond the role of depressive symptoms alone.

Conclusion

Disinhibited eating, or the tendency to experience a loss of control and eating in response to negative emotions, as well as subjective feelings of hunger are important dimensions of eating, particularly as related to weight bias internalization and binge eating. Weight bias internalization is an important factor to consider among pre-surgical bariatric patients and warrants additional treatment considerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9:788–805. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2001.108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Psychosocial origins of obesity stigma: toward changing a powerful and pervasive bias. Obes Rev. 2003;4:213–27. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-789X.2003.00122.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee M, Ata RN, Brannick MT. Malleability of weight-biased attitudes and beliefs: a meta-analysis of weight bias reduction interventions. Body Image. 2014;11:251–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Andreyeva T, Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Changes in perceived weight discrimination among Americans, 1995-1996 through 2004-2006. Obesity. 2008;16:1129–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenberg D, Noria S, Grover B, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issues Committee. ASMBS position statement on weight bias and stigma. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:814–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.04.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Durso LE, Latner JD. Understanding self-directed stigma: development of the weight bias internalization scale. Obesity. 2008;16:S80–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Papadopoulos S, Brennan L. Correlates of weight stigma in adults with overweight and obesity: a systematic literature review. Obesity. 2015;23:1743–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Puhl RM, Himmelstein MS, Pearl RL. Weight stigma as a psychosocial contributor to obesity. Am Psychol. 2020;75:274–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lent MR, Napolitano MA, Wood GC, et al. Internalized weight bias in weight-loss surgery patients: psychosocial correlates and weight loss outcomes. Obes Surg. 2014;24:2195–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1455-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roberto CA, Sysko R, Bush J, et al. Clinical correlates of the weight bias internalization scale in a sample of obese adolescents seeking bariatric surgery. Obesity. 2012;20:533–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lawson JL, LeCates A, Ivezaj V, et al. Internalized weight bias and loss-of-control eating following bariatric surgery. Eat Disord J Treat Prev. 2020:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2020.1731920.

  12. Kahan S, Puhl RM. The damaging effects of weight bias internalization. Obesity. 2017;25:280–1. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Puhl RM, Moss-Racusin CA, Schwartz MB. Internalization of weight bias: implications for binge eating and emotional well-being. Obesity. 2007;15:19–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2007.521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meany G, Conceição E, Mitchell JE. Binge eating, binge eating disorder and loss of control eating: effects on weight outcomes after bariatric surgery. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2014;22:87–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2273.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Baldofski S, Rudolph A, Tigges W, et al. Weight bias internalization, emotion dysregulation, and non-normative eating behaviors in prebariatric patients. Int J Eat Disord. 2016;49:180–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cox S, Brode C. Predictors of binge eating among bariatric surgery candidates: disinhibition as a mediator of the relationship between depressive symptoms and binge eating. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1990–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3129-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Stunkard AJ, Messick S. The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res 1985;29:71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8.

  18. Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD, Wilson GT, et al. Binge eating among gastric bypass patients at long-term follow-up. Obes Surg. 2002;12:270–5. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089202762552494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Linde JA, Jeffery RW, Levy RL, et al. Binge eating disorder, weight control self-efficacy, and depression in overweight men and women. Int J Obes. 2004;28:418–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802570.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gormally J, Black S, Daston S, et al. The assessment of binge eating severity among obese persons. Addict Behav. 1982;7:47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(82)90024-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Grupski AE, Hood MM, Hall BJ, et al. Examining the binge eating scale in screening for binge eating disorder in bariatric surgery candidates. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0537-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Allison DB, Kalinsky LB, Gorman BS. A comparison of the psychometric properties of three measures of dietary restraint. Psychol Assess. 1992;4:391–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.3.391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck Depression Inventory-II 1996. https://doi.org/10.1037/t00742-000.

  24. Hood MM, Grupski AE, Hall BJ, et al. Factor structure and predictive utility of the binge eating scale in bariatric surgery candidates. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:942–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2012.06.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marek RJ, Heinberg LJ, Lavery M, et al. A review of psychological assessment instruments for use in bariatric surgery evaluations. Psychol Assess. 2016;28:1142–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pan H, Liu S, Miao D, et al. Sample size determination for mediation analysis of longitudinal data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0473-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:155–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Adler S, Fowler N, Robinson AH, et al. Correlates of dietary adherence and maladaptive eating patterns following roux-en-y bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1130–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2987-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mensinger JL, Calogero RM, Tylka TL. Internalized weight stigma moderates eating behavior outcomes in women with high BMI participating in a healthy living program. Appetite. 2016;102:32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sienko RM, Saules KK, Carr MM. Internalized weight bias mediates the relationship between depressive symptoms and disordered eating behavior among women who think they are overweight. Eat Behav. 2016;22:141–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Matthew B, Flesher M, Sampath S, et al. The effect of intensive preconditioning and close follow-up on bariatric surgery outcomes: does multidisciplinary care contribute to positive results whether a gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy is performed? B C Med J. 2015;57(6):238–43.

    Google Scholar 

  33. McVay MA, Friedman KE. The benefits of cognitive behavioral groups for bariatric surgery patients. Bariatr Times. 2012;9:22–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Winer ES, Cervone D, Bryant J, et al. Distinguishing mediational models and analyses in clinical psychology: atemporal associations do not imply causation. J Clin Psychol. 2016;72:947–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Quilliot D, Brunaud L, Mathieu J, et al. Links between traumatic experiences in childhood or early adulthood and lifetime binge eating disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2019;276:134–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.05.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ambwani S, Boeka AG, Brown JD, et al. Socially desirable responding by bariatric surgery candidates during psychological assessment. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:300–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2011.06.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zachary A. Soulliard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Cassie Brode was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, 5U54GM104942-03. Dr. Nova Szoka reports serving as a consultant for Johnson & Johnson and CMR Surgical. No other disclosures among the authors exist.

Ethical Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent Statement

Informed consent does not apply.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soulliard, Z.A., Brode, C., Tabone, L.E. et al. Disinhibition and Subjective Hunger as Mediators Between Weight Bias Internalization and Binge Eating Among Pre-Surgical Bariatric Patients. OBES SURG 31, 797–804 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05023-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05023-z

Keywords

Navigation