Eating Behavior after Bariatric Surgery (EBBS) Questionnaire: a New Validated Tool to Quantify the Patients’ Compliance to Post-Bariatric Dietary and Lifestyle Suggestions



In the management of bariatric surgery follow-up, a multidisciplinary approach allows to evaluate the weight loss maintenance and the dietary and lifestyle changes adherence. The main aim of this study is to create and to validate a questionnaire (eating behavior after bariatric surgery (EBBS)) to objectivize the compliance to dietary/lifestyle suggestions after bariatric surgery.

Materials and Methods

An observational retrospective monocentric clinical trial was carried out at the Bariatric Surgery Unit of Modena, Italy. All weight-related data of bariatric surgery patients collected during the multidisciplinary post-surgical path were recorded. EBBS questionnaire and three validated psychological tests were administered. EBBS includes 11 questions concerning food (domain A), drinks (B), behaviors (C), and lifestyle (S). All data analyzed in the study were collected during the same visit.


In 41 enrolled patients (52.2 + 11.9 years), the total weight loss after surgery was 44.87 + 18.37 kg (− 35.40 + 11.60%), with a weight loss maintenance of 86.92 + 14.30%. The EBBS questionnaire showed a good internal validity (Cronbach’s alpha 0.743, Hotelling’s T-square test p < 0.001). The S domain was directly related with the percentage of weight loss maintained (p = 0.048), suggesting that the frequent physical activity and the periodic weight self-check are the most predictive behaviors to obtain weight control. None of the psychological questionnaires appeared related to the weight trend.


We validated for the first time a 11-item self-filling questionnaire allowing to quantify the adaption to dietary/lifestyle suggestions provided after bariatric surgery. EBBS questionnaire could be a useful tool both in clinical and research setting to monitor the patient’s adherence to post-surgical indications and to identify predictive factors for bariatric surgery efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    Apovian CM. Obesity: definition, comorbidities, causes, and burden. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(7 Suppl):s176–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Vecchie A, Dallegri F, Carbone F, et al. Obesity phenotypes and their paradoxical association with cardiovascular diseases. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;48:6–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bhaskaran K, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Leon DA, et al. Association of BMI with overall and cause-specific mortality: a population-based cohort study of 3.6 million adults in the UK. The lancet Diabetes & endocrinology. 2018;6(12):944–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Di Cesare M, Soric M, Bovet P, et al. The epidemiological burden of obesity in childhood: a worldwide epidemic requiring urgent action. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):212.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chooi YC, Ding C, Magkos F. The epidemiology of obesity. Metab Clin Exp. 2019;92:6–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Alleva G. La salute degli italiani: aspetti sociali e demografici. In: Italiani CDeSC, editor. Italy: Quaderni; 2017.

  7. 7.

    Barbieri M, Desesquelles A, Egidi V, et al. Obesity-related mortality in France, Italy, and the United States: a comparison using multiple cause-of-death analysis. Int J Public Health. 2017;62(6):623–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Flegal KM, Kit BK, Orpana H, et al. Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama. 2013;309(1):71–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Spelta F, Fratta Pasini AM, Cazzoletti L, et al. Body weight and mortality in COPD: focus on the obesity paradox. Eat Weight Disord. 2018;23(1):15–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ladhani M, Craig JC, Irving M, et al. Obesity and the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32(3):439–49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gallagher EJ, LeRoith D. Obesity and diabetes: the increased risk of cancer and cancer-related mortality. Physiol Rev. 2015;95(3):727–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Heymsfield SB, Wadden TA. Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and management of obesity. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(3):254–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ryan DH, Kahan S. Guideline recommendations for obesity management. The Medical clinics of North America. 2018;102(1):49–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Smethers AD, Rolls BJ. Dietary management of obesity: cornerstones of healthy eating patterns. The Medical clinics of North America. 2018;102(1):107–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Thorell A, MacCormick AD, Awad S, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg. 2016;40(9):2065–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Baig SJ, Priya P, Mahawar KK, et al. Weight regain after bariatric surgery-a multicentre study of 9617 patients from Indian Bariatric Surgery Outcome Reporting Group. Obes Surg. 2019;29(5):1583–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Taylor GJ, Bagby RM, Parker JDA. I disturbi della regolazione affettiva. 2000.

  18. 18.

    Cavedoni S, Dondi P, Valentini L. Valutazione preliminare e trattamento post-chirurgico rivolti a pazienti sottoposti ad interventi di chirurgia bariatrica. In: Angeli F, editor; 2018.

  19. 19.

    Fava GA, Kellner R, Perini GI, et al. Italian validation of the symptom rating test (SRT) and symptom questionnaire (SQ). Can J Psychiatr. 1983;28(2):117–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cuzzolaro M, Vetrone G, Marano G, et al. The body uneasiness test (BUT): development and validation of a new body image assessment scale. Eat Weight Disord. 2006;11(1):1–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ruini C, Ottolini F, Rafanelli C, et al. The relationship of psychological well-being to distress and personality. Psychother Psychosom. 2003;72(5):268–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometria. 1951;16(3):297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1997;314(7080):572.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Heo M, Kim N, Faith MS. Statistical power as a function of Cronbach alpha of instrument questionnaire items. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Welch G, Wesolowski C, Zagarins S, et al. Evaluation of clinical outcomes for gastric bypass surgery: results from a comprehensive follow-up study. Obes Surg. 2011;21(1):18–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Yanos BR, Saules KK, Schuh LM, et al. Predictors of lowest weight and long-term weight regain among Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Obes Surg. 2015;25(8):1364–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Merillat BD, Gonzalez-Vallejo C. How much sugar is in my frink? The power of visual cues. Nutrients. 2020;12(2)

  28. 28.

    Pedraza LS, Popkin BM, Batis C, et al. The caloric and sugar content of beverages purchased at different store-types changed after the sugary drinks taxation in Mexico. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Avenell A, Robertson C, Skea Z, et al. Bariatric surgery, lifestyle interventions and orlistat for severe obesity: the REBALANCE mixed-methods systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2018;22(68):1–246.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wolnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Kern B, et al. Predictors of outcome in treatment of morbid obesity by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: results of a prospective study of 380 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(4):500–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    David LA, Sijercic I, Cassin SE. Preoperative and post-operative psychosocial interventions for bariatric surgery patients: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2020;21(4):e12926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kudel I, Pona A, Cox S, et al. Psychometric properties of NIH PROMIS(R) instruments in bariatric surgery candidates. Health Psychol. 2019;38(5):359–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mohun SH, Spitznagel MB, Gunstad J, et al. Performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in older adults presenting for bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2700–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Moscovici M, Wnuk S, Okrainec A, et al. Psychosocial predictors of cognition in bariatric surgery. Psychosomatics. 2019;60(2):164–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Pinto-Bastos A, Conceicao E, de Lourdes M, et al. Psychological and behavioral aspects of primary and reoperative surgery: a 6-month longitudinal study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3984–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Schafer L, Hubner C, Carus T, et al. Pre- and postbariatric subtypes and their predictive value for health-related outcomes measured 3 years after surgery. Obes Surg. 2019;29(1):230–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lin Z, Qu S. Legend of weight loss: a crosstalk between the bariatric surgery and the brain. Obes Surg. 2020;30:1988–2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Spirou D, Raman J, Smith E. Psychological outcomes following surgical and endoscopic bariatric procedures: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2020;21

  39. 39.

    Gibson AA, Sainsbury A. Strategies to improve adherence to dietary weight loss interventions in research and real-world settings. Behav Sci (Basel). 2017;7(3)

  40. 40.

    Yancy Jr WS, Mayer SB, Coffman CJ, et al. Effect of allowing choice of diet on weight loss: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(12):805–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Santi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spaggiari, G., Santi, D., Budriesi, G. et al. Eating Behavior after Bariatric Surgery (EBBS) Questionnaire: a New Validated Tool to Quantify the Patients’ Compliance to Post-Bariatric Dietary and Lifestyle Suggestions. OBES SURG 30, 3831–3838 (2020).

Download citation


  • Obesity
  • bariatric surgery
  • Post-surgical follow-up
  • Dietary recommendations
  • lifestyle change