Skip to main content
Log in

Are Noninvasive Methods Comparable to Liver Biopsy in Postoperative Patients After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Transient tissue elastography (TTE) may estimate the degree of hepatic fibrosis in patients with obesity, but the method has restrictions that are mainly related to patients’ BMI.

Purpose

To compare the results of the evaluation of hepatic fibrosis by biochemical methods and TTE with those determined by liver biopsy in patients after RYGB.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study involving patient data, TTE, and liver biopsy 1 year after RYGB.

Results

Of the 94 selected patients, 33 underwent TTE and liver biopsy. The average weight of patients was 84.4 ± 15.4 kg. The mean APRI was 0.2 ± 0.1, and 36 patients (97.3%) were classified as F0–F1. The average NFS was − 2.0 ± 1.0, with 25 patients (67%) classified as F0–F1 and 12 patients (32.4%) classified as F2. The agreement rate between Fibroscan and liver biopsy was 80.0%. Histological analysis revealed regression of inflammatory changes in all patients: 26 patients (72.2%) had some degree of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NAS ≥ 5), and after surgery, no patient presented inflammation upon biopsy. Nine patients (24.3%) had fibrosis at surgery, and only two (5.4%) still had fibrosis 1 year later (p < 0.008).

Conclusions

The use of APRI and Fibroscan is promising, but more studies are needed to evaluate patients with an advanced degree of NAFLD and confirm the entire spectrum of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sachdev MS, Riely CA, Madan AK. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease of obesity. Obes Surg. 2006;16(11):1412–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertot LC, Adams LA. The natural course of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(5):774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):328–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rofsky NM, Fleishaker H. CT and MRI of diffuse liver disease. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1995;16(1):16–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong GL, Wong VW. Fat and fiber: how the controlled attenuation parameter complements noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60(1):9–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Karlas T, Petroff D, Sasso M, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) technology for assessing steatosis. J Hepatol. 2017;66(5):1022–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shi KQ, Tang JZ, Zhu XL, et al. Controlled attenuation parameter for the detection of steatosis severity in chronic liver disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29(6):1149–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29(12):1705–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh S, Muir AJ, Dieterich DT, et al. American gastroenterological association institute technical review on the role of elastography in chronic liver diseases. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(6):1544–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Petta S, Wong VW, Camma C, et al. Improved noninvasive prediction of liver fibrosis by liver stiffness measurement in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease accounting for controlled attenuation parameter values. Hepatology. 2017;65(4):1145–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Castera L. Non-invasive tests for liver fibrosis progression and regression. J Hepatol. 2016;64(1):232–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vilar-Gomez E, Martinez-Perez Y, Calzadilla-Bertot L, et al. Weight loss through lifestyle modification significantly reduces features of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(2):367–78.e5. quiz e14–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Promrat K, Kleiner DE, Niemeier HM, et al. Randomized controlled trial testing the effects of weight loss on nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2010;51(1):121–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mummadi RR, Kasturi KS, Chennareddygari S, et al. Effect of bariatric surgery on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6(12):1396–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sasaki A, Nitta H, Otsuka K, et al. Bariatric surgery and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: current and potential future treatments. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014;27(5):164.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G, et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: a noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatology. 2007;45(4):846–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Peleg N, Issachar A, Sneh-Arbib O, et al. AST to platelet ratio index and fibrosis 4 calculator scores for non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2017;49(10):1133–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41(6):1313–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Khorgami Z, Arheart KL, Zhang C, et al. Effect of ethnicity on weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(5):769–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Admiraal WM, Bouter K, Celik F, et al. Ethnicity influences weight loss 1 year after bariatric surgery: a study in Turkish, Moroccan, South Asian, African and ethnic Dutch patients. Obes Surg. 2013;23(9):1497–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee Y, Doumouras AG, Yu J, et al. Complete resolution of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(6):1040–60.e11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Garg H, Aggarwal S, Shalimar YR, et al. Utility of transient elastography (fibroscan) and impact of bariatric surgery on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in morbidly obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(1):81–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Naveau S, Lamouri K, Pourcher G, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of transient elastography for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in bariatric surgery candidates with suspected NAFLD. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1693–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barsamian C, Czernichow S, Sasso M, et al. Applicability, reliability and diagnostic performance of Fibroscan for liver evaluation in severe obese patients candidate to bariatric surgery. J Hepatol. 2016;64(2):S213–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nickel JC, Fradet Y, Boake RC, et al. Efficacy and safety of finasteride therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a 2-year randomized controlled trial (the PROSPECT study). PROscar safety plus efficacy Canadian two year study. CMAJ. 1996;155(9):1251–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cazzo E, Jimenez LS, Pareja JC, et al. Effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease evaluated through NAFLD fibrosis score: a prospective study. Obes Surg. 2015;25(6):982–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Loy JJ, Youn HA, Schwack B, et al. Improvement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome in adolescents undergoing bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):442–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nascimbeni F, Lebray P, Fedchuk L, et al. Significant variations in elastometry measurements made within short-term in patients with chronic liver diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(4):763–71.e1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Castera L, Friedrich-Rust M, Loomba R. Noninvasive assessment of liver disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(5):1264–81.e4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Petta S, Maida M, Macaluso FS, et al. The severity of steatosis influences liver stiffness measurement in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2015;62(4):1101–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kwok R, Tse YK, Wong GL, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: non-invasive assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease--the role of transient elastography and plasma cytokeratin-18 fragments. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39(3):254–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiao G, Zhu S, Xiao X, et al. Comparison of laboratory tests, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance elastography to detect fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2017;66(5):1486–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Funari Pereira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pereira, P.F., Von Diemen, V., Trindade, E.N. et al. Are Noninvasive Methods Comparable to Liver Biopsy in Postoperative Patients After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass?. OBES SURG 30, 2566–2571 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04513-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04513-4

Keywords

Navigation