Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consecutive Versus Selective Primary and Revisional Single Incision Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: Personal Experience in 330 Cases

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This paper aims to retrospectively evaluate the feasibility, safety, and standardization for both consecutive primary and revisional SILS bariatric surgeries, and to analyze incisional hernia’s prevalence, technical improvements, and limiting factors.

Methods

A retrospective database review was undertaken involving, in Part I (Belgium), 290 consecutive SILS, including 80.68% primary bariatric surgeries, and 19.32% revisional gastric bypass, followed in Part II (Lebanon), by 40 selective primary SILS. Training for and standardization of the trans-umbilical technique was done for the operating room team, and was executed in part II.

Results

The procedure of single incision was successfully completed in all of the 330 cases part I & part II. There was a need for additional salvage for one or two trocars in respectively 3.1% and 2.75% of the cases. There were no deaths or conversions in either group. Early complications included one medically healed fistula after revisional GB, and two secondary gastric and intestinal perforation requiring reoperations. Late surgical complications were: “3 patients (1.03%) in Part I and 2 (5%) in Part II suffered occlusions, requiring laparoscopic mesenteric defect’s closure on an internal herniation.” Twelve patients (4.1%) from part I and 5 (12.5%) in part II suffered an incisional hernia.

Conclusion

Selective SILS, when standardized, tends to be superior to consecutive SILS in terms of overall morbidity, operative time, and need for additional salvage trocars. Cost effectiveness and higher midterm rate of umbilical port site incisional hernia should be weighed against the beneficial cosmetic effect for the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palanivelu C, Vij A, Rajapandian S, et al. Single incision laparoscopic colorectal resection: our experience. J Minim Access Surg. Oct. 2012;8(4):134–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.103118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc Springer-Verlag. 2009;23:896–9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18815836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Praveen Raj P, Siddhartha Bhattacharya R, Parthasarathi R, et al. Evolution and standardization of techniques in single incision laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2018;28:574–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-3036-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, et al. Single laparoscopic incision transabdominal (SLIT) surgery-adjustable gastric banding: a novel minimally invasive surgical approach. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1628–31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18830779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH, Elian A. Single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19:755–8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19747034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lakdawala M, Agarwal A, Dhar S, et al. Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. A 2-year comparative analysis of 600 patients. Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):607–14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25322809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH, Minnick DB. Single-port access trans umbilical laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass using the SILS port: first reported case. Surg Innov. 2010;16:343–7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20031939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang C-K, Houng J-Y, Chiang C-J, et al. Single incision transumbilical laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a first case report. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1711–5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19551452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morales-Conde S, Rubio-Manzanares Dorado M, Barranco A, et al. Single-port roux-en-Y gastric bypass: toward a less invasive procedure with the same surgical results and a better cosmesis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4347–53. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23846366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Julliard O, Hauters P, Possoz J, et al. Incisional hernia after single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidence and predictive factors. Surg Endosc Springer US. 2016;30:4539–43. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-016-4790-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1154–60. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20401544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Chelala, H.Baraké, J.Estievenart, M.Dessily, F.Charara, JL.Allé; Long term outcomes of 1326 laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair with the routine suturing concept. a single institution experience. CHU Tivoli – Hernia Revue of Surgery 2016–20(1)101–110, La Louvière, Belgium. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26093891

  13. Doulamis IP, Economopoulos KP. Transumbilical roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients: a systematic review. Int J Surg Elsevier Ltd. 2015;20:153–7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26166741

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huang CK, Tsai JC, Lo CH, et al. Preliminary surgical results of single incision transumbilical laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2011;21:391–6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20119736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mittermair R, Pratschke J, Sucher R. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Am Surg. 2013;79(4):393–7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23574850

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dimitrokallis N, Alexandrou A, Schizas D, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Review and a critical appraisal. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2017;27(3):217–26. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28146416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang SH, Stoll CR, Song J, et al. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003-2012. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(3):275–87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24352617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fernandez JI, Farias CO, Ovalle CL, et al. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2015;25(3):430–5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25160092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pitot D, Takieddine M, Abbassiz Z, et al. Pure transumbilical SILS gastric bypass with mechanical circular gastrojejunal anastomosis feasibility. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3007–11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24853853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rogula T, Daigle C, Dua M, et al. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery can be performed through a single incision: a comparative study. Obes Surg. 2014;24(7):1102–8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24817374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Galvani CA, Choh M, Gorodner MV. Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy using a novel technique for liver retraction. JSLS. 2010;14:228–33. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20932374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maluenda F, Leon J, Csendes A, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: initial experience in 20 patients and 2-year follow-up. Eur Surg. 2014;46:32–7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260376101_Single-incision_laparoscopic_sleeve_gastrectomy_Initial_experience_in_20_patients_and_2-year_follow-up

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:1037–47. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23619321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Connell MB, Selvam R, Patel SV. Incidence of incisional hernias following single incision versus traditional laparoscopic surgery: a metaanalysis. Hernia. 2019;23:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1853-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30471045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Uslu HY, Erkek AB, Cakmak A, et al. Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007;17:600–3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17907971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee DY, Rehmani SS, Guend H, et al. The incidence of trocar-site hernia in minimally invasive bariatric surgery: a comparison of multi versus single-port laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(4):1287–91. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23232997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gaillard M, Tranchart H, Lainas P, et al. Single port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a routine procedure in 1000 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1270–7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27178611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Buckley FP, Vassaur HE, Jupiter DC, et al. Influencing factors for port-site hernias after single-incision laparoscopy. Hernia. 2016;20:729–33. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27417943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA. Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(6):1509–15. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22179470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zepeda Mejia IA, Rogula T. Laparoscopic single incision gastric bypass: initial experience, technique and short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Innov res. 2015:9–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13022-015-0016-z. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26473005

  31. Alevizos L, Lirici MM, et al. Laparo-endoscopic single site sleeve gastrectomy: results from a preliminary series of selected patients. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012;21(1):40–5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22211915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Koh CE, Martin DJ, Cavallucci DJ, et al. On the road to single-site laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: lessons learned from 60 cases. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:947–53. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20953885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lakdawala MA, Muda NH, Goel S, et al. Single incision sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy—a randomized pilot study. Obes Surg. 2011;11:1664–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0478-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank the coworkers and residents Dr. Julie Estievenart and Dr. Celine Bombeck for the database collected at CHU Tivoli, and Dr. JL Allé, head of the surgery departement, for the cooperation and the development of the SILS activity at CHU Tivoli. Finally, I would like to thank tremendously Pr. Jacques Himpens for the review and advice provided in the elaboration of this article and Dr. Souheil Hallit from USEK, for his rich input in the statistics analysis of the manuscript review.

Legend Abbreviations

SILS-GB Single incision Laparoscopic Gastric Bypas.

BPD Biliopancreatic diversion.

SADI-S Single anastomosis duodeno ileal-sleeve gastrectomy.

SILS-RYGB Single incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

HTN Blood hypertension.

SAS Sleep apnea syndrome.

DM II Diabetes mellitus type II.

SG Sleeve Gastrectomy.

DS Duodenal Switch.

GB Gastric Bypass.

R Revisional.

P Primary.

SILS Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. General Surgery Department, University Hospital Notre Dame des Secours, Byblos, Lebanon

    Elie Chelala, Wissam El Hajj Moussa, Simon Rizk & Nidal Assaker

  2. Faculty of medicine and medical sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik (USEK), Jounieh, Lebanon

    Elie Chelala, Wissam El Hajj Moussa, Simon Rizk & Nidal Assaker

  3. General Surgery Department, University Hospital of Tivoli, La Louvière, Belgium

    Elie Chelala

Authors
  1. Elie Chelala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wissam El Hajj Moussa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Simon Rizk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nidal Assaker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EC declares that he has been a consultant surgeon for Covidien-Medtronic with rewarded scientific activities.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elie Chelala.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

For this retrospective review and analysis, the inform consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chelala, E., El Hajj Moussa, W., Rizk, S. et al. Consecutive Versus Selective Primary and Revisional Single Incision Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: Personal Experience in 330 Cases. OBES SURG 30, 1515–1526 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04356-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04356-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation