Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Indications, Operative Techniques, and Outcomes for Revisional Operation Following Mini-Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review

  • Review
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In addition to being a relatively reversible and less complex operation, mini-gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) has demonstrated comparable weight loss and metabolic improvement rates with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, surgical strategies for managing its failures and late complications were poorly defined. This article aims to review the indications, operative techniques, and outcomes for revisional surgery following MGB-OAGB. A systematic review was performed using the PubMed database from 1997 to 2019. Of 179 included patients, 89 underwent revision to RYGB; 52 to sleeve gastrectomy (SG); 32 reversal to original anatomy; and 6 underwent partial revision with gastro-gastrostomy alone. Most common indications were severe malnutrition, chronic bile reflux, intractable marginal ulcerations, and insufficient weight loss. Postoperative complication rates ranged from 5 to 35%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11(3):276–80. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089201321336584.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rutledge R, Kular K, Manchanda N. The mini-gastric bypass original technique. Int J Surg. 2019;61:38–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0726-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen CY, Lee WJ, Lee HM, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of gastric bypass complication to sleeve gastrectomy: technique and early results. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2014–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2066-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson WH, Fernanadez AZ, Farrell TM, et al. Surgical revision of loop (“mini”) gastric bypass procedure: multicenter review of complications and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(1):37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2006.09.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO Worldwide Survey 2016: Primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3783–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3450-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28(5):1188–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3182-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahawar KK, Kumar P, Carr WR, et al. Current status of mini-gastric bypass. J Minim Access Surg. 2016;12(4):305–10. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.181352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Alkhalifah N, Lee WJ, Hai TC, et al. 15-year experience of laparoscopic single anastomosis (mini-)gastric bypass: comparison with other bariatric procedures. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(7):3024–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-6011-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bolckmans R, Arman G, Himpens J. Efficiency and risks of laparoscopic conversion of omega anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2018;33:2572–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6552-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee WJ, Lee YC, Ser KH, et al. Revisional surgery for laparoscopic minigastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(4):486–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2010.10.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Poghosyan T, Caille C, Moszkowicz D, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of severe complications after omega-loop gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(6):988–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, et al. One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015;25(6):951–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1552-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Apers J, Wijkmans R, Totte E, et al. Implementation of mini gastric bypass in the Netherlands: early and midterm results from a high-volume unit. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(9):3949–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6136-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Amor IB, Petrucciani N, Kassir R, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of one anastomosis gastric bypass to a standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2646-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dang H, Arias E, Szomstein S, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of distal mini-gastric bypass to proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for malnutrition: case report and review of the literature. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(3):383–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2009.01.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eilenberg M, Langer FB, Beer A, et al. Significant liver-related morbidity after bariatric surgery and its reversal-a case series. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):812–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2925-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Facchiano E, Leuratti L, Veltri M, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of one anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for chronic bile reflux. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):701–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-2017-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kassir R, Blanc P, Lointier P, et al. Laparoscopic revision of an omega loop gastric bypass to treat afferent loop syndrome. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1976–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1805-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nimeri A, Al Shaban T, Maasher A. Conversion of one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for bile reflux gastritis after failed Braun jejunojejunostomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(2):361–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.10.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Parmar CD, Mahawar KK, Boyle M, et al. Mini Gastric Bypass: first report of 125 consecutive cases from United Kingdom. Clin Obes. 2016;6(1):61–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Genser L, Soprani A, Tabbara M, et al. Laparoscopic reversal of mini-gastric bypass to original anatomy for severe postoperative malnutrition. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2017;402(8):1263–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1615-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khalaj A, Kalantar Motamedi MA, Mousapour P, et al. Protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one-anastomosis-mini-gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB): case series from the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS). Obes Surg. 2019;29:1714–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03741-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Reche F, Mancini A, Borel AL, et al. Totally robotic reversal of omega-loop gastric bypass to normal anatomy. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1994–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2257-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang JHE, Tan DMY, Chan WH, et al. Endoscopic partial reversal of complicated single anastomosis gastric bypass. Endoscopy. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0841-9831.

  27. Mahawar KK, Graham Y, Carr WR, et al. Revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review of comparative outcomes with respective primary procedures. Obes Surg. 2015;25(7):1271–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1670-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pucher PH, Lord AC, Sodergren MH, et al. Reversal to normal anatomy after failed gastric bypass: systematic review of indications, techniques, and outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(7):1351–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tacchino RM. Bowel length: measurement, predictors, and impact on bariatric and metabolic surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):328–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shoar S, Nguyen T, Ona MA, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass reversal: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(7):1366–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.02.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Box 956904, 72-239 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA

    Usah Khrucharoen, Yen-Yi Juo, Yijun Chen & Erik P. Dutson

  2. UCLA Center for Advanced Surgical & Interventional Technology (CASIT), Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Usah Khrucharoen, Yen-Yi Juo & Erik P. Dutson

Authors
  1. Usah Khrucharoen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yen-Yi Juo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yijun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Erik P. Dutson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik P. Dutson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khrucharoen, U., Juo, YY., Chen, Y. et al. Indications, Operative Techniques, and Outcomes for Revisional Operation Following Mini-Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review. OBES SURG 30, 1564–1573 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04276-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04276-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation