Abbreviations
- OAGB:
-
one anastomosis gastric bypass
- RYGB:
-
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
- SAE:
-
serious adverse event
- BP:
-
bilio-pancreatic
References
Maud R, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA) – a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2019 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30489-1 [Epub ahead of print]
Mahawar KK, Parmar C, Carr WRJ, et al. Impact of biliopancreatic limb length on severe protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(1):37–43.
Mahawar KK. Another fatal outcome with a biliopancreatic limb length of 200 cm with one anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2017;27(7):1882–3.
Mahawar KK. A biliopancreatic limb of >150 cm with OAGB/MGB is ill-advised. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):2164–5.
Parmar CD, Mahawar KK. One anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass is now an established bariatric procedure: a systematic review of 12,807 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2956–67.
Chaar ME, Lundberg P, Stoltzfus J. Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(5):545–51.
Mahawar KK, Carr WR, Balupuri S, et al. Controversy surrounding ‘mini’ gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24(2):324–33.
Mahawar KK, Jennings N, Brown J, et al. “Mini” gastric bypass: systematic review of a controversial procedure. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1890–8.
Mahawar KK, Himpens J, Shikora SA, et al. The first consensus statement on one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) using a modified Delphi approach. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):303–12.
Meghelli L, Narducci F, Mariette C, et al. Reporting adverse events in cancer surgery randomized trials: a systematic review of published trials in oesophago-gastric and gynecological cancer patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;104:108–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Statement on Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
Informed consent is not applicable.
Ethical Approval
Ethical approval is not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahawar, K.K. Findings of YOMEGA Trial Need to Be Interpreted with Caution. OBES SURG 29, 2616–2617 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03856-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03856-x