Obesity Surgery

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 474–484 | Cite as

Multi-Centre Micro-Costing of Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass, Sleeve Gastrectomy and Adjustable Gastric Banding Procedures for the Treatment of Severe, Complex Obesity

  • Brett DobleEmail author
  • Richard Welbourn
  • Nicholas Carter
  • James Byrne
  • Chris A. Rogers
  • Jane M. Blazeby
  • Sarah Wordsworth
  • On behalf of the By-Band-Sleeve Trial Management Group
Original Contributions



There is a growing interest in comparing the effectiveness and costs of alternative forms of bariatric surgery. We aimed to examine the per-patient, procedural costs of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and adjustable gastric banding (AGB) in the United Kingdom.


Multi-centre (two National Health Service; NHS and one private hospital) micro-costing, using a time-and-motion study. Prospective collection of surgery times, staff quantities, equipment, instruments and consumables for 12 patients (four RYGB, five SG, three AGB) from patients’ first surgeon interaction on the day of surgery to departure from the theatre recovery area. Costs were attached to quantities and mean costs compared. Sensitivity and scenario analyses assessed the impact of varying surgery inputs and consideration of additional plausible factors respectively on total costs.


Mean procedural costs were £5002 for RYGB, £4306 for SG and £2527 for AGB. Varying staff seniority or altering procedure times had small impacts on costs (± 4–6%). Reducing prices of consumables by 20% reduced costs by 10–13%. Accounting for differences in surgical technique by altering the number of staple reloads used impacted costs by ± 7–10%. Adjusted total costs from scenario analyses were similar to NHS tariffs for RYGB and SG (difference of £51 and -£119 respectively) but were much lower for AGB (difference of £1982).


These detailed costs will allow for more precise reimbursement of bariatric surgery and support comprehensive assessments of cost-effectiveness. Additional work to investigate costs of post-surgical care, re-operations and life-long support received by patients following surgery is required.


Bariatric surgery Bottom-up costing Costs Cost analysis Economics Micro-costing Reimbursement Tariffs Time-in-motion study 



By-Band-Sleeve Trial Management Group: Jane Blazeby (Chief Investigator), University of Bristol; Richard Welbourn (Surgical Lead), Musgrove Park Hospital; James Byrne (Surgical Expertise), Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust; Jenny Donovan (Qualitative Research Lead), University of Bristol; Barnaby C. Reeves (Methodologist Lead), University of Bristol; Sarah Wordsworth (Health Economics Lead), University of Oxford; Robert C. Andrews (Endocrinology Lead), University of Exeter; Janice L. Thompson (Nutritional Lead), University of Birmingham; Graziella Mazza (Trial Manager), University of Bristol; Chris A. Rogers (Trials Unit and Statistical Lead), University of Bristol.


This study is funded by The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) programme (project number 09/127/53) for which Richard Welbourn, Nicholas Carter, James Byrne, Chris A. Rogers, Jane M. Blazeby and Sarah Wordsworth are investigators. The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the HTA programme, NIHR, the UK National Health Service, or the Department of Health. Jane M. Blazeby is an NIHR Senior Investigator.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Author 2 declares receiving support from Ethicon Endo-Surgery for attending conferences and funding a Bariatric Clinical Fellow as well as receiving honoraria from Novo Nordisk. Author 5 received salary funding from the British Heart Foundation. All the other authors have no conflict of interests to declare, except support from a government grant detailed in the acknowledgements.

Ethical Approval

The National Research Ethics Committee South West – Frenchay approved the micro-costing on 6th December 2011 as part of the BBS study protocol. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the BBS study.

Supplementary material

11695_2018_3553_MOESM1_ESM.docx (77 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 77 kb)


  1. 1.
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Obesity: identification, assessment and management. London, UK: NICE; 27 November 2014.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). National Coverage Determination (NCD) for bariatric surgery for treatment of co-morbid conditions related to morbid obesity (100.1). Balitmore, MD: CMS; 2013.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Health and Medical Research Council. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of overweight and obesity in adults, adolescents and children in Australia. Melbourne: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2013.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kizy S, Jahansouz C, Downey MC, et al. National trends in bariatric surgery 2012-2015: demographics, procedure selection, readmissions, and cost. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):2933–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farrell TM, Haggerty SP, Overby DW, et al. Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(5):930–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rogers CA, Welbourn R, Byrne J, et al. The by-band study: gastric bypass or adjustable gastric band surgery to treat morbid obesity: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot phase. Trials. 2014;15:53.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(41):1–190. 215-357, iii-ivCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Padwal R, Klarenbach S, Wiebe N, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review of the clinical and economic evidence. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(10):1183–94.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Campbell JA, Venn A, Neil A, et al. Diverse approaches to the health economic evaluation of bariatric surgery: a comprehensive systematic review. Obes Rev. 2016;17(9):850–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rogers CA, Reeves BC, Byrne J, et al. Adaptation of the by-band randomized clinical trial to by-band-sleeve to include a new intervention and maintain relevance of the study to practice. Br J Surg. 2017;104(9):1207–14.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doble B, Wordsworth S, Rogers CA, et al. What are the real procedural costs of bariatric surgery? A systematic literature review of published cost analyses. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):2179–92.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tan SS, Rutten FF, van Ineveld BM, et al. Comparing methodologies for the cost estimation of hospital services. Eur J Health Econ. 2009;10(1):39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wordsworth S, Ludbrook A, Caskey F, et al. Collecting unit cost data in multicentre studies. Creating comparable methods. Eur J Health Econ. 2005;6(1):38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Charles JM, Edwards RT, Bywater T, et al. Micro-costing in public health economics: steps towards a standardized framework, using the incredible years toddler parenting program as a worked example. Prev Sci. 2013;14(4):377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frick KD. Microcosting quantity data collection methods. Med Care. 2009;47(7 Suppl 1):S76–81.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mogyorosy Z, Smith P. The main methodological issues in costing health care services—a literature review: CHE research paper 7. Centre for Health Economics: York; 2005.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    National Health Service (NHS). NHS Supply Chain. Newcastle upon Tyne: NHS Buisness Service Authority; 2017.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Medicines Complete. British National Formulary (BNF). London: BMj Group and the Royal Pharmacuetical Society of Great Britian; 2017.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Curtis LA, Burns A. PSSRU—unit costs of health and social care 2017. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent; 2017.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Employers NHS. Pay and conditions circular (M&D) 1/2016. NHS Employers: Leeds; 2016.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scottish Health Service Costs - Theatre Services (R140X): Number of theatres, expenditures and usage, by board [database on the Internet]. ISD Scotland. 2017 [cited 15 February 2018]. Available from:
  24. 24.
    Ismail I, Wolff S, Gronfier A, et al. A cost evaluation methodology for surgical technologies. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(8):2423–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reference Cost Collection: National Schedule of Reference Costs, 2016–17—NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts [database on the Internet]. NHS Improvement. November 2017. Available from:
  26. 26.
    2017/18 and 2018/19 National Tariff: currencies and prices [database on the Internet]. NHS. 2017 [cited February 15, 2018]. Available from:
  27. 27.
    Gounder ST, Wijayanayaka DR, Murphy R, et al. Costs of bariatric surgery in a randomised control trial (RCT) comparing Roux en Y gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese diabetic patients. N Z Med J. 2016;129(1443):43–52.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Doumouras AG, Saleh F, Tarride JE, et al. A population-based analysis of the drivers of short-term costs after bariatric surgery within a publicly funded regionalized center of excellence system. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(5):1023–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Doble B. Comment on: systematic assessment of decision analytic models for the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery for morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(7):1059–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brett Doble
    • 1
    Email author
  • Richard Welbourn
    • 2
  • Nicholas Carter
    • 3
  • James Byrne
    • 4
  • Chris A. Rogers
    • 5
  • Jane M. Blazeby
    • 6
  • Sarah Wordsworth
    • 1
  • On behalf of the By-Band-Sleeve Trial Management Group
  1. 1.Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric SurgeryMusgrove Park HospitalTauntonUK
  3. 3.Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Department, Queen Alexandra HospitalPortsmouth Hospitals NHS TrustPortsmouthUK
  4. 4.Southampton University Hospitals NHS TrustSouthamptonUK
  5. 5.Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  6. 6.Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations