Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Letter to the Editor: MGB and OAGB

  • Letter to Editor/LED Reply
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 11 February 2019

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Change history

  • 11 February 2019

    The Editor has retracted this article (1) because it is a duplicate of an article published previously (2) in this journal. This error was the result of an incorrect file being uploaded to the submission system. [The author agrees to this retraction].

  • 11 February 2019

    The Editor has retracted this article (1) because it is a duplicate of an article published previously (2) in this journal. This error was the result of an incorrect file being uploaded to the submission system. [The author agrees to this retraction].

  • 11 February 2019

    The Editor has retracted this article (1) because it is a duplicate of an article published previously (2) in this journal. This error was the result of an incorrect file being uploaded to the submission system. [The author agrees to this retraction].

  • 11 February 2019

    The Editor has retracted this article (1) because it is a duplicate of an article published previously (2) in this journal. This error was the result of an incorrect file being uploaded to the submission system. [The author agrees to this retraction].

References

  1. De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3182-3.

  2. Rutledge R, Walsh W. Continued excellent results with the minigastric bypass: six-year study in 2,410 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1304–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. minigastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1827–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Musella M, Sousa A, Greco F, et al. The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: the Italian experience: outcomes from 974 consecutive cases in a multi-center review. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:156–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. A 6-year experience with 1,054 mini-gastric bypasses—first study from Indian subcontinent. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1430–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deitel M, Hargroder D, Peraglie C. Mini-gastric bypass for bariatric surgery increasing worldwide. Austin J Surg. 2016;3(3):1092–6. https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjsurg.2016.1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Christou NV, Look D, MacLean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244:734–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Higa K, Ho T, Tecero F, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:516–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson WH, Fernandez AZ, Farell TM, et al. Surgical revision of loop (“mini”) gastric bypass procedure: multicenter review of complications and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carbajo MA, Luque-de-Leon E, Jiminez JM, et al. Laparoscopic oneanastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1153–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jammu GS, Sharma R. A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and minigastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg. 2016;26:928–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Deitel M. Essentials of mini-one anastomosis gastric bypass. Cham: Springer Nature; 2018. ISBN 978-3-76176-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76177-0.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Mion F, Tolone S, Garros A, et al. High-resolution impedance manometry after sleeve gastrectomy: increased intragastric pressure and reflux are frequent events. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2449–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Felsenreich DM, Kefurt R, Schermann M, et al. Reflux, sleeve dilatation, and Barrett’s esophagus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: long-term follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27:3092–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jammu Hospital, Jalandhar, Punjab, India

    Gurvinder Singh Jammu

Authors
  1. Gurvinder Singh Jammu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gurvinder Singh Jammu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

The Editor has retracted this article because it is a duplicate of an article published previously in this journal. This error was the result of an incorrect file being uploaded to the submission system. The author agrees to this retraction.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jammu, G.S. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Letter to the Editor: MGB and OAGB. OBES SURG 28, 2912–2913 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3328-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3328-3

Search

Navigation