Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic Fistula-jejunostomy for Chronic Gastro-jejunal Fistula After Sleeve Gastrectomy

  • Video Submission
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Proximal gastric leak is one of the most common complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Endoscopy is the gold standard treatment for acute staple-line leaks. Surgery is the most effective treatment modality in case of chronic fistula.

Material and Methods

A 55-year- old man presented an acute leak after LSG. The leak was treated with metal stent deployment with temporary closure. After 6 months, he presented leak recurrence with general sepsis, perigastric-infected collection, and gastro-jejunal fistula.

Results

Endoscopic internal drainage (EID) was performed; however, due to fistula persistence, a surgical procedure was proposed. The patient refused revisional surgery; therefore, endoscopic salvage procedure was decided. A fully covered metal stent was deployed in order to bypass the perigastric collection creating an endoscopic gastro-jejunal anastomosis.

Conclusion

Revisional surgery is the gold standard treatment for chronic fistula after SG. Endoscopic treatment with SEMS deployment may be a sound option in selected cases especially after failure of other endoscopic techniques or refusal of revisional surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gagner M. Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes as an alternative to roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a better long-term strategy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;S1550–7289(15):00064–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gagner M, Deitel M, Erickson AL, et al. Survey on laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at the fourth international consensus summit on sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2013;23(12):2013–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stroh C, Birk D, Flade-Kuthe R, et al. Results of sleeve gastrectomy—data from a nationwide survey on bariatric surgery in Germany. Obes Surg. 2009;19(5):632–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Donatelli G, Dumont JL, Cereatti F, et al. Treatment of leaks following sleeve gastrectomy by endoscopic internal drainage (EID). Obes Surg. 2015;25(7):1293–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahadev S, Kumbhari V, Campos JM, et al. Endoscopic septotomy: an effective approach for internal drainage of sleeve gastrectomy-associated collections. Endoscopy. 2017;49(5):504–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruzzi M, Douard R, Voron T, et al. Open total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for a chronic fistula after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(10):1803–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chouillard E, Younan A, Alkandari M, et al. Roux-en-Y fistulo-jejunostomy as a salvage procedure in patients with post-sleeve gastrectomy fistula: mid-term results. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(10):4200–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianfranco Donatelli.

Ethics declarations

This study is in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(MP4 61,097 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Donatelli, G., Guerriero, L., Cereatti, F. et al. Endoscopic Fistula-jejunostomy for Chronic Gastro-jejunal Fistula After Sleeve Gastrectomy. OBES SURG 28, 1456–1457 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3193-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3193-0

Keywords

Navigation