Skip to main content
Log in

Specialty Article: so You Think You Got a Bypass? A Case Series of Adventures in Bariatric Surgery

  • REVIEW
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To raise awareness for surgeons encountering bariatric patients with anatomy that deviates from the standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This is a single-institution retrospective case series over 12 years (2003–2014) involving patients who believed they received RYGBs, but actually did not. Data was obtained reviewing physician encounters, imaging, and operative reports. There were six cases with confusing clinical pictures, found to have aberrant RYGB anatomy: (1) gastric bypass with jejuno-jejunostomy only without gastrojejunostomy, (2) distal partial vertical gastrectomy without expected prosthetic band, (3) inverse vertical banded gastroplasty, (4) non-divided gastric bypass with no gastrojejunostomy, (5) 20-cm Roux limb, with gastro-gastric fistula, and (6) 200-cm bilio-pancreatic limb similar to the traditional Scopinaro procedure. There are cases of “Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses” that have no resemblance to the named procedure at all. Adjunctive upper gastrointestinal studies and upper endoscopies help surgeons make diagnoses that are incongruent with the surgical history. It is important to keep in mind that there could be anatomic or surgical variations which were born out of necessity or based on other surgeons’ creativities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buchwald H, Oien D. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obesisty Surgery. 2013;23:427–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Acquafresca P, Palermo M, Rogula T, et al. Early surgical complications after gastric by-pass: a literature review. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015;28(1):74–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wernick B, Jansen M, Noria S, et al. Essential bariatric emergencies for the acute care surgeon. European Journal Trauma Emergency Surgery. 2016;42(5):571–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Palmero M, Acquafresca P, Rogula T, et al. Late surgical complications after gastric by-pass: a literature review. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015;28(2):139–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamdan K, Somers S, Chand M. Management of late postoperative complications of bariatric surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1345–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Healy P, Clarke C, Reynolds I, et al. Complications of bariatric surgery—what the general surgeon needs to know. Surgeon. 2016;14:91–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ponce J, DeMaria E, Nguyen N, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of bariatric surgery procedures in 2015 and surgeon work force in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:1637–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Elder K, Wolfe B. Bariatric surgery: a review of procedures and outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2253–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen N, Varela J. Bariatric surgery for obesity and metabolic disorders: state of the art. Nature Reviews: Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2017;14:160–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roslin M, Cripps C, Peristeri A. Bariatric and metabolic surgery: current trends and what’s to follow. Current Opinion of Gastroenterology. 2015;31:513–8.

  11. Brethauer S, Kothari S, Sudan R. Systemic review on re-operative bariatric surgery. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Revision Task Force. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014:00–0.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception, design, overall responsibility: TS.

Data collection: EW and TS.

Analysis and interpretation of data: EW and TS.

Writing the article: EW and TS.

Critical revision of the article: TS.

Final approval of the article: TS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy R. Shope.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval Statement

For this type of retrospective study, formal consent is not required.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent does not apply.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, E.Y., Shope, T.R. Specialty Article: so You Think You Got a Bypass? A Case Series of Adventures in Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 28, 1429–1432 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3149-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3149-4

Keywords

Navigation