Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 1643–1652 | Cite as

Increased Bile Acid Signals After Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass Improve Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) in a Rodent Model of Diet-Induced NASH

  • Takahiro Tsuchiya
  • Takeshi Naitoh
  • Munenori Nagao
  • Naoki Tanaka
  • Kazuhiro Watanabe
  • Hirofumi Imoto
  • Tomohiro Miyachi
  • Fuyuhiko Motoi
  • Michiaki Unno
Original Contributions
  • 303 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The increasing incidence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has resulted in it becoming a common cause of liver-related mortality; however, no efficient treatment has been established. It has been reported that bariatric surgery improves metabolic comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus and NASH. Although the mechanism is unclear, it is thought that the changes in bile acid (BA) signaling via its nuclear receptor, farnesoid X receptor (FXR), produce various metabolic effects. We sought to investigate the effects and mechanisms of bariatric surgery on NASH improvement.

Methods

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed by a high-fat and high-fructose diet, which results in obesity, insulin resistance, and NASH. Rats underwent duodenal-jejunal bypass (DJB), which is a main component of bariatric procedures. The liver pathological findings and the expression level of mRNA of FXR were investigated. The plasma BA level was measured in peripheral and portal vein blood.

Results

DJB suppressed weight gain, improved insulin resistance, and ameliorated NASH mainly in a point of inflammation. The plasma BA level along with the expression of FXR and its target transcriptional factor, small heterodimer partner (SHP), in the liver were elevated.

Conclusions

DJB has a direct effect on NASH improvement, and there is a possibility that an anti-inflammatory effect is functioning as a part of the mechanism. The increase of plasma bile acid level followed by the stimulation of FXR signaling may contribute to this phenomenon.

Keywords

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis Bariatric surgery Metabolic surgery Duodenal-jejunal bypass Bile acids 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Fumiyoshi Fujishima for contribution in pathological diagnosis, Ms. Emiko Shibuya for technical assistance, and the staff of Institute for Animal Experimentation, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, for assistance with animal husbandry and care.

Funding Information

This study was supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant No.: 25462011).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

A Statement of Animal Rights/Ethical Approval

All procedures in this study were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Research of Tohoku University.

References

  1. 1.
    Bedogni G, Miglioli L, Masutti F, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the Dionysos nutrition and liver study. Hepatology. 2005;42(1):44–52.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20734.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matteoni CA, Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology. 1999;116(6):1413–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70506-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Starley BQ, Calcagno CJ, Harrison SA. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma: a weighty connection. Hepatology. 2010;51(5):1820–32.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23594.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charlton MR, Burns JM, Pedersen RA, et al. Frequency and outcomes of liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(4):1249–53.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.06.061.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.14.1724.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1577–85.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1200111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sjostrom L. Review of the key results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) trial—a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013;273(3):219–34.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995;222(3):339–350; discussion 50-2.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199509000-00011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rubino F. Medical research: time to think differently about diabetes. Nature. 2016;533(7604):459–61.  https://doi.org/10.1038/533459a.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, et al. Metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes: a joint statement by international diabetes organizations. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(6):861–77.  https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-0236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clark JM, Alkhuraishi AR, Solga SF, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass improves liver histology in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Obes Res. 2005;13(7):1180–6.  https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2005.140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klein S, Mittendorfer B, Eagon JC, et al. Gastric bypass surgery improves metabolic and hepatic abnormalities associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(6):1564–72.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2006.01.042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moretto M, Kupski C, da Silva VD, et al. Effect of bariatric surgery on liver fibrosis. Obes Surg. 2012;22(7):1044–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0559-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kohli R, Bradley D, Setchell KD, et al. Weight loss induced by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass but not laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding increases circulating bile acids. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(4):E708–12.  https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-3736.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patti ME, Houten SM, Bianco AC, et al. Serum bile acids are higher in humans with prior gastric bypass: potential contribution to improved glucose and lipid metabolism. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17(9):1671–7.  https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2009.102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kasama K, Tagaya N, Kanehira E, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass: technique and preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2009;19(10):1341–5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9873-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Naitoh T, Kasama K, Seki Y, et al. Efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy with duodenal-jejunal bypass for the treatment of obese severe diabetes patients in Japan: a retrospective multicenter study. Obes Surg. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2874-4.
  18. 18.
    Berthiaume N, Zinker BA. Metabolic responses in a model of insulin resistance: comparison between oral glucose and meal tolerance tests. Metabolism. 2002;51(5):595–8.  https://doi.org/10.1053/meta.2002.31989.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41(6):1313–21.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Imoto H, Shibata C, Ikezawa F, et al. Effects of duodeno-jejunal bypass on glucose metabolism in obese rats with type 2 diabetes. Surg Today. 2014;44(2):340–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0638-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miyachi T, Nagao M, Shibata C, et al. Biliopancreatic limb plays an important role in metabolic improvement after duodenal-jejunal bypass in a rat model of diabetes. Surgery. 2016;159(5):1360–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.11.027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bray GA, York DA. Hypothalamic and genetic obesity in experimental animals: an autonomic and endocrine hypothesis. Physiol Rev. 1979;59(3):719–809.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leclercq IA, Farrell GC, Schriemer R, et al. Leptin is essential for the hepatic fibrogenic response to chronic liver injury. J Hepatol. 2002;37(2):206–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00102-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rinella ME, Green RM. The methionine-choline deficient dietary model of steatohepatitis does not exhibit insulin resistance. J Hepatol. 2004;40(1):47–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2003.09.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kawasaki T, Igarashi K, Koeda T, et al. Rats fed fructose-enriched diets have characteristics of nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis. J Nutr. 2009;139(11):2067–71.  https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.109.105858.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Charlton M, Krishnan A, Viker K, et al. Fast food diet mouse: novel small animal model of NASH with ballooning, progressive fibrosis, and high physiological fidelity to the human condition. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;301(5):G825–34.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00145.2011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Matsuzawa N, Takamura T, Kurita S, et al. Lipid-induced oxidative stress causes steatohepatitis in mice fed an atherogenic diet. Hepatology. 2007;46(5):1392–403.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21874.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ter Horst KW, Serlie MJ. Fructose consumption, lipogenesis, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nutrients. 2017;9(9)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rosselli M, MacNaughtan J, Jalan R, et al. Beyond scoring: a modern interpretation of disease progression in chronic liver disease. Gut. 2013;62(9):1234–41.  https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302826.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lefebvre P, Cariou B, Lien F, et al. Role of bile acids and bile acid receptors in metabolic regulation. Physiol Rev. 2009;89(1):147–91.  https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00010.2008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mudaliar S, Henry RR, Sanyal AJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of the farnesoid X receptor agonist obeticholic acid in patients with type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(3):574–82.e1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Loomba R, Sanyal AJ, Lavine JE, Van Natta ML, Abdelmalek MF, et al. Farnesoid X nuclear receptor ligand obeticholic acid for non-cirrhotic, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (FLINT): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2014.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang YD, Chen WD, Wang M, et al. Farnesoid X receptor antagonizes nuclear factor kappaB in hepatic inflammatory response. Hepatology. 2008;48(5):1632–43.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22519.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bhutta HY, Rajpal N, White W, et al. Effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery on bile acid metabolism in normal and obese diabetic rats. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0122273.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122273.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Goncalves D, Barataud A, De Vadder F, et al. Bile routing modification reproduces key features of gastric bypass in rat. Ann Surg. 2015;262(6):1006–15.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kohli R, Setchell KD, Kirby M, et al. A surgical model in male obese rats uncovers protective effects of bile acids post-bariatric surgery. Endocrinology. 2013;154(7):2341–51.  https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2012-2069.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Islam KB, Fukiya S, Hagio M, et al. Bile acid is a host factor that regulates the composition of the cecal microbiota in rats. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(5):1773–81.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.046.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kong LC, Tap J, Aron-Wisnewsky J, et al. Gut microbiota after gastric bypass in human obesity: increased richness and associations of bacterial genera with adipose tissue genes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(1):16–24.  https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.058743.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Osto M, Abegg K, Bueter M, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in rats alters gut microbiota profile along the intestine. Physiol Behav. 2013;119:92–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.06.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sweeney TE, Morton JM. The human gut microbiome: a review of the effect of obesity and surgically induced weight loss. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(6):563–9.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Aron-Wisnewsky J, Clement K. The effects of gastrointestinal surgery on gut microbiota: potential contribution to improved insulin sensitivity. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014;16(11):454.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-014-0454-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryTohoku University Graduate School of MedicineSendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations