Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 27, Issue 9, pp 2222–2228 | Cite as

Understanding Objections to One Anastomosis (Mini) Gastric Bypass: A Survey of 417 Surgeons Not Performing this Procedure

  • Kamal K. MahawarEmail author
  • Cynthia-Michelle Borg
  • Kuldeepak Singh Kular
  • Michael J. Courtney
  • Karim Sillah
  • William R. J. Carr
  • Neil Jennings
  • Brijesh Madhok
  • Rishi Singhal
  • Peter K. Small
Original Contributions

Abstract

Background

Despite published experience with thousands of patients, the uptake of One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) has been less than enthusiastic and many surgeons still harbour objections to this procedure. The purpose of this study was to understand these objections scientifically.

Methods

Bariatric surgeons from around the world were invited to participate in a questionnaire-based survey on SurveyMonkey®. Surgeons already performing this procedure were excluded.

Results

Four hundred seventeen bariatric surgeons (from 42 countries) not currently performing OAGB/MGB took the survey. There were 211/414 (50.97%) and 188/414 (45.41%) respondents who expressed concerns that it will lead to an increased risk of gastric and oesophageal cancers respectively. A total of 62/416 (14.9%) and 201/413 (n = 48.6%) surgeons respectively felt that OAGB/MGB was associated with a higher early (30-day) and late complication rate compared to the RYGB. Moreover, 7.8% (n = 32/411) and 16.26% (n = 67/412) of the respondents were concerned that OAGB/MGB carried a higher early (30-day) and late mortality, respectively, in comparison with the RYGB. There were 79/410 (19.27%) and 88/413 (21.3%) respondents who were concerned that OAGB/MGB was not an effective procedure for weight loss and co-morbidity resolution, respectively. A total of 258/411 (62.77%) respondents reported that OAGB/MGB was not approved by their national society as a mainstream bariatric procedure; 51.0% of these surgeons would start performing this procedure if it was.

Conclusions

Surgeons not performing OAGB/MGB cite a number of concerns for not performing this operation. This survey is the first scientific attempt to understand these objections scientifically.

Keywords

Mini gastric bypass One anastomosis gastric bypass Single anastomosis gastric bypass Omega loop gastric bypass Objections Gastric cancer Oesophageal cancer Bile reflux Malnutrition 

Abbreviations

OAGB/MGB

One Anastomosis (Mini) Gastric Bypass

IFSO

International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders

RYGB

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

GORD

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

Not applicable.

Statement of Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Source(s) of Funding

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11(3):276–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):697–703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Musella M, Susa A, Greco F, et al. The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: the Italian experience: outcomes from 974 consecutive cases in a multicenter review. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(1):156–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. A 6-year experience with 1,054 mini-gastric bypasses—first study from Indian subcontinent. Obes Surg. 2014;24(9):1430–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, et al. One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015;25(6):951–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mahawar KK, Jennings N, Brown J, et al. “Mini” gastric bypass: systematic review of a controversial procedure. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1890–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242(1):20–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee WJ, Chong K, Lin YH, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus single anastomosis (mini-) gastric bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: 5-year results of a randomized trial and study of incretin effect. Obes Surg. 2014;24(9):1552–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seetharamaiah S, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. LSG vs OAGB-1 year follow-up data—a randomized control trial. Obes Surg. 2016 7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mahawar KK, Carr WR, Balupuri S, et al. Controversy surrounding ‘mini’ gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24(2):324–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Madhok B, Mahawar KK, Boyle M, et al. Management of super-super obese patients: comparison between mini (one anastomosis) gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2016;26(7):1646–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parmar C, Abdelhalim MA, Mahawar KK, et al. Management of super-super obese patients: comparison between one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2016 15Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Collins BJ, Miyashita T, Schweitzer M, et al. Gastric bypass: why Roux-en-Y? A review of experimental data. Arch Surg. 2007;142(10):1000–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson WH, Fernanadez AZ, Farrell TM, et al. Surgical revision of loop (“mini”) gastric bypass procedure: multicenter review of complications and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(1):37–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mahawar KK, Borg CM, Agarwal S, et al. Criteria for inclusion of newer bariatric and metabolic procedures into the mainstream: a survey of 396 bariatric surgeons. Obes Surg. 2016 5Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    No Authors Listed. Bariatric Surgery Procedures. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. http://asmbs.org/patients/bariatric-surgery-procedures Last accessed on 5th January 2017
  19. 19.
    Mahawar KK, Carr WR, Jennings N, et al. The name of mini gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2015;25(2):327–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Babor R, Booth M. Adenocarcinoma of the gastric pouch 26 years after loop gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2006;16(7):935–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Genser L, Carandina S, Tabbara M, et al. Presentation and surgical management of leaks after mini-gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(2):305–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Facchiano E, Leuratti L, Veltri M, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of one anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for chronic bile reflux. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):701–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nimeri A, Al Shaban T, Maasher A. Laparoscopic conversion of one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for bile reflux gastritis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(1):119–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee WJ, Wang W, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: experience with tailored bypass limb according to body weight. Obes Surg. 2008;18(3):294–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mahawar KK, Kumar P, Parmar C, et al. Small bowel limb lengths and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):660–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nergaard BJ, Leifsson BG, Hedenbro J, et al. Gastric bypass with long alimentary limb or long pancreato-biliary limb—long-term results on weight loss, resolution of co-morbidities and metabolic parameters. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1595–602.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kamal K. Mahawar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cynthia-Michelle Borg
    • 2
  • Kuldeepak Singh Kular
    • 3
  • Michael J. Courtney
    • 1
  • Karim Sillah
    • 1
  • William R. J. Carr
    • 1
  • Neil Jennings
    • 1
  • Brijesh Madhok
    • 4
  • Rishi Singhal
    • 5
  • Peter K. Small
    • 1
  1. 1.Bariatric UnitSunderland Royal HospitalSunderlandUK
  2. 2.University Hospital Lewisham, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS TrustLondonUK
  3. 3.Kular HospitalBijaIndia
  4. 4.Royal Derby HospitalDerbyUK
  5. 5.Birmingham Heartlands HospitalBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations