Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy—5-Year Follow-Up Study in an Eastern European Emerging Bariatric Center

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained ground in Eastern Europe in the decade but fewer reports of large series with medium-term follow-up exist. We describe a single-surgeon experience in LSG (the first 101 consecutive cases) in a Balkan emerging bariatric center.

Methods

A prospectively maintained database of the initial 101 consecutive patients submitted to LSG in our clinic between October 2010 and February 2016 was reviewed.

Results

The percentages of mean excess weight loss (%EWL) in the 101 patients (mean age of 42 ± 10.6 years, 77 % female, median preoperative body mass index (BMI) of 44.5 kg/m2) were 51.3 (n = 82 followed-up patients) at 6 months postoperatively, 78.2 (n = 69) at 1 year, and 75.8 (n = 39), 77.1 (n = 20), 67.5 (n = 17), and 52.9 (n = 7) at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. One year after LSG, all comorbidities showed remission or significant improvement in all 69 followed-up patients; the highest resolution was seen with hypertension (73.3 %). We noted a negative correlation between a decrease in %EWL and both the age of the patient and the initial state weight and BMI. The mortality in our group was nil; we had three cases (2.9 %) of bleeding and no leaks.

Conclusions

LSG is a safe procedure, with low postoperative morbidity rates and excellent short-term %EWL results up to 3 years after surgery, including resolution or improvement of the main obesity-related comorbidities. The results were superior in the category of younger and lower initial BMI obese patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8:267–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kehagias I, Karamanokos SN, Argentou M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the management of patients with BMI < 50 kg/m2. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1650–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadière GB. A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1450–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boza C, Salinas J, Salgado N, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a stand-alone procedure for morbid obesity: report of 1000 cases and 3-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2012;22:866–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuks D, Verhaeghe P, Brehant O, et al. Results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective study in 135 patients with morbid obesity. Surgery. 2009;145:106–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Ragot E, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure for failed gastric banding and vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1216–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Sur. 2010;252:319–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenthal RJ, Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, et al. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of 12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:8–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. WHO Geneva, World Health Organization 2013. Global Health Observatory Data Repository [online database]. (http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main. Accessed 21 May 2013).

  10. Farrell TM, Haggerty SP, Overby DW, et al. Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:930–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Copaescu C. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Chirurgia (Buc). 2009;104:79–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dapri G, Cadiere GB, Himpens J. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective randomized clinical study comparing three techniques. Obes Surg. 2010;4:462–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mussella M, Milone M, Bellini M, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Do we need to oversew the staple line? Annal Ital Chir. 2011;82:273–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gentileschi P, Camperchioli I, D’Ugo S, et al. Staple-line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using three different techniques: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2623–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morgenthal CB, Lin E, Shane MD, et al. Who will fail laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication? Preoperative prediction of long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1978–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Soricelli E, Iossa A, Casella G, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy and crural repair in obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or hiatal hernia. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:356–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruscio S, Abdelgawad M, Badiali D, et al. Simple versus reinforced cruroplasty in patients submitted to concomitant laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective evaluation in a bariatric center of excellence. Surg Endosc. 2016;3:2374–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clapp B. Prosthetic bioabsorbable mesh for hiatal hernia repair during sleeve gastrectomy. JSLS. 2013;17:641–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Armstrong J, O’Malley SP. Outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a safe and effective procedure? Int J Sur. 2010;8:69–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Magee CJ, Barry J, Arumugasamy M, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for high-risk patients: weight loss and comorbidity improvement—short-term results. Obes Surg. 2011;21:547–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaillard M, Tranchart H, Lainas P, et al. Single-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a routine procedure in 1000 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.011.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stenard F, Iannelli A. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux. World J Gastrenterol. 2016;21:10348–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zerrweck C, Rodríguez JG, Aramburo E, et al. Revisional surgery following laparoscopic gastric plication. Obes Surg. 2016.

  24. Paulus GF, de Vaan LE, Verdam FJ, et al. Bariatric surgery in morbidly obese adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25:860–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang MC, Guo XH, Zhang YW, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy for obese patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Surg. 2015;81:166–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fatima J, Houghton SG, Iqbal CW, et al. Bariatric surgery at extremes age. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1392–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Luppi CR, Balague C, Taragona EM, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients over 60 years: impact of age on weight loss and co-morbidity improvement. Surg Obes Realat Dis. 2015;11:296–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ritz P, Topart P, Benchetrit S, et al. Benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in patients aged more than 60 years. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2013.12.012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was done under the frame of project no. 6869/12.06.2014, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Tîrgu Mureș.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Surgery Clinic No. 2, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Târgu Mureș, Gh. Marinescu St., No. 50, 540109, Tîrgu Mureș, Romania

    Radu Mircea Neagoe, Mircea Mureșan, Șerban Bancu, Ionuț Balmos, Vasile Băișan & Daniela Sala

  2. Epidemiology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Târgu Mureș, Tîrgu Mureș, Romania

    Septimiu Voidăzan

Authors
  1. Radu Mircea Neagoe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mircea Mureșan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Șerban Bancu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ionuț Balmos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vasile Băișan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Septimiu Voidăzan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Daniela Sala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mircea Mureșan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neagoe, R.M., Mureșan, M., Bancu, Ș. et al. Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy—5-Year Follow-Up Study in an Eastern European Emerging Bariatric Center. OBES SURG 27, 983–989 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2407-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2407-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation