Obesity Surgery

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 983–989 | Cite as

Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy—5-Year Follow-Up Study in an Eastern European Emerging Bariatric Center

  • Radu Mircea Neagoe
  • Mircea MureșanEmail author
  • Șerban Bancu
  • Ionuț Balmos
  • Vasile Băișan
  • Septimiu Voidăzan
  • Daniela Sala
Original Contributions



Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained ground in Eastern Europe in the decade but fewer reports of large series with medium-term follow-up exist. We describe a single-surgeon experience in LSG (the first 101 consecutive cases) in a Balkan emerging bariatric center.


A prospectively maintained database of the initial 101 consecutive patients submitted to LSG in our clinic between October 2010 and February 2016 was reviewed.


The percentages of mean excess weight loss (%EWL) in the 101 patients (mean age of 42 ± 10.6 years, 77 % female, median preoperative body mass index (BMI) of 44.5 kg/m2) were 51.3 (n = 82 followed-up patients) at 6 months postoperatively, 78.2 (n = 69) at 1 year, and 75.8 (n = 39), 77.1 (n = 20), 67.5 (n = 17), and 52.9 (n = 7) at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. One year after LSG, all comorbidities showed remission or significant improvement in all 69 followed-up patients; the highest resolution was seen with hypertension (73.3 %). We noted a negative correlation between a decrease in %EWL and both the age of the patient and the initial state weight and BMI. The mortality in our group was nil; we had three cases (2.9 %) of bleeding and no leaks.


LSG is a safe procedure, with low postoperative morbidity rates and excellent short-term %EWL results up to 3 years after surgery, including resolution or improvement of the main obesity-related comorbidities. The results were superior in the category of younger and lower initial BMI obese patients.


Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy Morbid obesity Emerging center Eastern Europe 



This paper was done under the frame of project no. 6869/12.06.2014, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Tîrgu Mureș.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8:267–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kehagias I, Karamanokos SN, Argentou M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the management of patients with BMI < 50 kg/m2. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1650–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadière GB. A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1450–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boza C, Salinas J, Salgado N, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a stand-alone procedure for morbid obesity: report of 1000 cases and 3-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2012;22:866–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fuks D, Verhaeghe P, Brehant O, et al. Results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective study in 135 patients with morbid obesity. Surgery. 2009;145:106–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Ragot E, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure for failed gastric banding and vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1216–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Sur. 2010;252:319–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosenthal RJ, Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, et al. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of 12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:8–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    WHO Geneva, World Health Organization 2013. Global Health Observatory Data Repository [online database]. ( Accessed 21 May 2013).
  10. 10.
    Farrell TM, Haggerty SP, Overby DW, et al. Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:930–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Copaescu C. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Chirurgia (Buc). 2009;104:79–85.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dapri G, Cadiere GB, Himpens J. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective randomized clinical study comparing three techniques. Obes Surg. 2010;4:462–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mussella M, Milone M, Bellini M, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Do we need to oversew the staple line? Annal Ital Chir. 2011;82:273–7.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gentileschi P, Camperchioli I, D’Ugo S, et al. Staple-line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using three different techniques: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2623–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morgenthal CB, Lin E, Shane MD, et al. Who will fail laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication? Preoperative prediction of long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1978–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Soricelli E, Iossa A, Casella G, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy and crural repair in obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or hiatal hernia. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:356–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ruscio S, Abdelgawad M, Badiali D, et al. Simple versus reinforced cruroplasty in patients submitted to concomitant laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective evaluation in a bariatric center of excellence. Surg Endosc. 2016;3:2374–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clapp B. Prosthetic bioabsorbable mesh for hiatal hernia repair during sleeve gastrectomy. JSLS. 2013;17:641–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Armstrong J, O’Malley SP. Outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a safe and effective procedure? Int J Sur. 2010;8:69–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Magee CJ, Barry J, Arumugasamy M, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for high-risk patients: weight loss and comorbidity improvement—short-term results. Obes Surg. 2011;21:547–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gaillard M, Tranchart H, Lainas P, et al. Single-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a routine procedure in 1000 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.011.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stenard F, Iannelli A. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux. World J Gastrenterol. 2016;21:10348–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zerrweck C, Rodríguez JG, Aramburo E, et al. Revisional surgery following laparoscopic gastric plication. Obes Surg. 2016.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Paulus GF, de Vaan LE, Verdam FJ, et al. Bariatric surgery in morbidly obese adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25:860–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang MC, Guo XH, Zhang YW, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy for obese patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Surg. 2015;81:166–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fatima J, Houghton SG, Iqbal CW, et al. Bariatric surgery at extremes age. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1392–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luppi CR, Balague C, Taragona EM, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients over 60 years: impact of age on weight loss and co-morbidity improvement. Surg Obes Realat Dis. 2015;11:296–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ritz P, Topart P, Benchetrit S, et al. Benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in patients aged more than 60 years. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.12.012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Radu Mircea Neagoe
    • 1
  • Mircea Mureșan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Șerban Bancu
    • 1
  • Ionuț Balmos
    • 1
  • Vasile Băișan
    • 1
  • Septimiu Voidăzan
    • 2
  • Daniela Sala
    • 1
  1. 1.Surgery Clinic No. 2University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Târgu MureșTîrgu MureșRomania
  2. 2.Epidemiology DepartmentUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy of Târgu MureșTîrgu MureșRomania

Personalised recommendations