Abstract
Background
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is associated with approximately 25 % weight loss failure, resulting in insufficient weight loss or weight regain. Strategies of revisional surgery focus on alteration of limb length, pouch or stoma size. Altering pouch size and outlet by adding laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) might initiate further weight loss. The goal of this study is to review the safety and efficacy of LAGB after failed RYGB in a retrospective cohort of patients in our institute.
Methods
Patients with secondary LAGB (n = 44) were studied between May 2012 and January 2015. Demographics, effects on weight loss and complications were analysed.
Results
Mean age and body mass index (BMI) at time of LAGB was 45.8 ± 8.2 years and 37.2 ± 5.4 kg/m2, respectively. Mean interval between RYGB and LAGB was 2.6 ± 1.3 years. Mean follow-up was 14 ± 7.9 months, with 25 % loss to follow-up at 12 months. Due to LAGB, patients lost an additional 17.6 % ± 28.3 % excess weight. Patients with weight regain after initial weight loss success showed more excess weight loss (EWL) compared to patients whom never reached 50% EWL after RYGB. Overall complication and reoperation rates were 30 and 21 %, respectively, with 16 % band removal. One fatality due to septic shock following band erosion was observed.
Conclusion
In this largest published cohort, secondary banding of failed RYGB provides only limited additional weight loss. Furthermore, this technique is associated with high morbidity and reoperation rates. A significant difference in effect was found between patients with weight loss failure and weight regain. Larger prospective series are necessary to evaluate if the modest benefits are worth the risks of secondary LAGB.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013. Obes Surg [Internet]. 2015; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11695-015-1657-z
Benotti PN, Forse RA. The role of gastric surgery in the multidisciplinary management of severe obesity. Am J Surg. 1995;169(3):361–7.
Magro DO, Geloneze B, Delfini R, et al. Long-term weight regain after gastric bypass: a 5-year prospective study. Obes Surg. 2008;18(6):648–51.
Rawlins ML, Teel D, Hedgcorth K, et al. Revision of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to distal bypass for failed weight loss. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(1):45–9.
Kellum JM, Chikunguwo SM, Maher JW, et al. Long-term results of malabsorptive distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in superobese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(2):189–93.
Al-Bader I, Khoursheed M, Al Sharaf K, et al.. Revisional laparoscopic gastric pouch resizing for inadequate weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2015;
Nguyen D, Dip F, Huaco JA, et al. Outcomes of revisional treatment modalities in non-complicated roux-en-y gastric bypass patients with weight regain. Obes Surg United States. 2015; May25(5):928–34.
Vijgen GHEJ, Schouten R, Bouvy ND, et al.. Salvage banding for failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2012. p. 803–808.
Sakran N, Assalia A, Sternberg A, et al. Smaller staple height for circular stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic gastric bypass: early results in 1,074 morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21(2):238–43.
Catona A, La Manna L, Forsell P. The Swedish adjustable gastric band: laparoscopic technique and preliminary results. Obes Surg [Internet]. 2000;10(1):15–21 .Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10715638
Irani K, Youn HA, Ren-Fielding CJ, et al. Midterm results for gastric banding as salvage procedure for patients with weight loss failure after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(2):219–24.
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.
Bessler M, Daud A, DiGiorgi MF, et al. Adjustable gastric banding as a revisional bariatric procedure after failed gastric bypass. Obes Surg England. 2005;15(10):1443–8.
Bessler M, Daud A, DiGiorgi MF, et al. Adjustable gastric banding as revisional bariatric procedure after failed gastric bypass-intermediate results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(1):31–5.
Aminian A, Corcelles R, Daigle CR, et al. Critical appraisal of salvage banding for weight loss failure after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis United States. 2015;11(3):607–11.
Chin PL, Ali M, Francis K, et al. Adjustable gastric band placed around gastric bypass pouch as revision operation for failed gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(1):38–42.
Shen X, Zhang X, Bi J, et al.. Long-term complications requiring reoperations after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2014.
Zhang L, Tan WH, Chang R, et al. Perioperative risk and complications of revisional bariatric surgery compared to primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc Germany. 2015; Jun29(6):1316–20.
Karmali S, Brar B, Shi X, et al. Weight recidivism post-bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2013:1922–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The study obtained ethics approval from the medical ethics committee of our institution.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uittenbogaart, M., Leclercq, W.K., Luijten, A.A. et al. Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding After Failed Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass. OBES SURG 27, 381–386 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2283-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2283-0