Abstract
Background
The intragastric migration of a surgically placed adjustable gastric band is believed to occur slowly, over months to years. Band removal procedures necessitate surgical laparotomy, thus increasing the risk of complications.
Methods
The endoscopic technique for band removal described in this case-series provides a minimally invasive approach.
Results
Fifteen patients referred for endoscopic removal of a partially migrated intragastric band. The partially migrated intragastric bands were all successfully removed in a mean of 1.1 endoscopic sessions. No patient required subsequent surgical intervention, and there were no immediate or delayed adverse events including no infections, bleeding, or perforations.
Conclusions
Endoscopic removal of partially migrated intragastric bands appears feasible, effective, safe, and is a minimally invasive alternative to repeat surgery.
References
Forsell P, Hellers G. The Swedish Adjustable Gastric Banding (SAGB) for morbid obesity: 9-year experience and 4-year follow-up of patients operated with a new adjustable band. Obes Surg. 1997;7:345–51.
O’Brien PE, Brown WA, Smith A, et al. Prospective study of a laparoscopically placed, adjustable gastric band in the treatment of morbid obesity. Br J Surg. 1999;85:113–8.
Weiss HG, Nehoda H, Labeck B, et al. Adjustable gastric and esophagogastric banding: a randomized clinical trial. Obes Surg. 2002;12:573–8.
Miller K, Hell E. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a prospective 4-year follow-up study. Obes Surg. 1999;9:183–7.
Westling A, Bjurling K, Ohrvall M, et al. Silicone adjustable gastric banding: disappointing results. Obes Surg. 1998;8:467–74.
Meir E, Van Baden M. Adjustable silicone gastric banding and band erosion: personal experience and hypotheses. Obes Surg. 1999;9:191–3.
Basa NR, Dutson E, Lewis C, et al. Laparoscopic transgastric removal of eroded adjustable band: a novel approach. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:194–7.
Mittermair RP, Weiss H, Nehoda H, et al. Uncommon intragastric migration of the Swedish adjustable band. Obes Surg. 2000;12:372–5.
Blero D et al. Endoscopic removal of dysfunctioning bands or rings after restrictive bariatric procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:468–74.
Stroh C, Hohmann U, Will U, et al. Experiences of two centers of bariatric surgery in the treatment of intragastrale band migration after gastric banding—the importance of the German multicenter observational study for quality assurance in obesity surgery 2005 and 2006. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:901–8.
Suter M, Calmes JM, Paroz A, et al. A 10-year experience with laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: high long-term complication and failure rates. Obes Surg. 2006;16:829–35.
Lovig T, Haffner JFW, Kaaresen R, et al. Gastric banding for morbid obesity: five years of follow-up. Int J Obes. 1993;17:453–7.
Coelho JCU, Solhaug JH, Moody FG, et al. Experimental evaluation of gastric banding for treatment of morbid obesity in pigs. Am J Surg. 1985;149:228–31.
Petrolesi F, Camerini G, Bonifacio E, et al. Radiology of adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity. Br J Radiol. 1998;71:717–22.
Ablassmaier B, Opitz I, Jacobi CA, et al. Intragastrale penetration eines justierbaren Magenbandes. Chirurg. 2001;72:838–43.
Regusci L, Groebli Y, Meyer JL, et al. Gastroscopic removal of an adjustable gastric band after partial intragastric migration. Obes Surg. 2003;13:281–4.
Di Lorenzo N, Lorenzo M, Furbetta F, et al. Intragastric gastric band migration: erosion: an analysis of multicenter experience on 177 patients. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(4):1151–7.
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khamaysi, I., Suissa, A., Yassin, K. et al. Endoscopic Removal of Partially Migrated Intragastric Bands Following Surgical Gastroplasty: a Prospective Case Series. OBES SURG 25, 942–945 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1629-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1629-3