Skip to main content
Log in

Two Hundred Seventy-Five Single-Incision Laparoscopic Gastric Band Insertions: What Have We Learnt?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Single-incision surgery in the morbidly obese patient has not been widely adopted, but remains a popular choice amongst patients. In the bariatric patient, it presents its own surgical challenges with hepatomegaly and increased abdominal adiposity. Here, we present our experience of 275 single-incision laparoscopic gastric bands.Between June 2009 and April 2013, 275 obese patients underwent single-incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding through a single incision using a multichannel single port and via a pars flaccida approach. Prospective data collection was undertaken including operating time, additional ports and additional procedures undertaken.In this series, median operative time was 60 (range 34–170) min. An additional port was placed in 15 patients (5 %), including two conversions to four-port technique (0.7 %). Of these patients (n = 15), the majority were male (p < 0.0001). Reasons for additional port placement included bleeding and anatomical abnormalities. Additional port placement occurred more often within the first 50 cases (5/50, 10 % vs 10/225, 4 %). An umbilical incision resulted in more wound-related complications than a transverse incision in the upper abdomen (p < 0.001). There were no 30-day mortality and minimal morbidity with two wound infections resulting in band removal.Single-incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding can be performed safely with minimal morbidity in the morbidly obese patient, and our technique has a high rate of success for all BMIs. Following 275 single-incision band insertions additional port placements were more commonly required in male patients, BMI >45 and earlier in the learning curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Philips M, Marks J, Roberts K, et al. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(5):1296–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, et al. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(8):1842–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel AG, Murgatroyd B, Ashton WD. Single incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: 111 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(6):747–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ren CJ, Fielding GA. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a surgical technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2003;13(4):257–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen N, Slone J, Reavis K. Comparison study of conventional laparoscopic gastric banding versus laparoendoscopic single site gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(5):503–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH. Early experience with single incision transumbilical laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1442–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keidar A, Shussman N, Elazary R, et al. Right-sided upper abdomen single-incision laparoscopic gastric bandings. Obes Surg. 2010;20:757–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwack B, Novak R, Youn H, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is effective and safe: 756 cases in an academic medical centre. Obes Surg. 2013;23(3):332–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gianni S, De Luca M, Oscar B, et al. Veress needle: a simple liver retraction technique for lap band positioning in (single incision laparoscopic technique) SILS. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):190–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Prasad A, Kaur M. Sils without frills. Indian J Surg. 2012;74(3):270–3.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Teixeira J, McGill K, Binenbaum S, et al. Laparoscopic single-site surgery for placement of an adjustable gastric band: initial experience. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(6):1409–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de la Torre RA, Satgunam S, Morales MP, et al. Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement with liver suture retractor. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1707–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Teixeira J, McGill K, Koshy N, et al. Laparoscopic single-site surgery for placement of adjustable gastric band—a series of 22 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang C, Lin Y, Huang H, et al. Single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a novel minimally invasive surgical technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20(3):e99–e102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tecchino R, Greco F, Matera D. Laparoscopic gastric banding without visible scar: a short series with intraumbilical SILS. Obes Surg. 2010;20:236–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Osborne A, Clancy R, Clark G, et al. Single incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: technique, feasibility, safety and learning curve. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95(2):131–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ayloo S, Masrur M, Contino G, et al. Two-year follow-up of wound complications associated with laparoendoscopic single-site adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(5):696–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koh C, Martin D, Cavallucci D, et al. On the road to single-site laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: lessons learned from 60 cases. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(3):947–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Galvani C, Gallo A, Gorodner M. Single incision and dual-incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: evaluation of initial experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(2):194–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chakravartty S, Murgatroyd B, Ashton D, et al. Single and multiple incision laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding; a matched comparison. Obes Surg. 2012;22(11):1695–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen N, Smith B, Reavis K, et al. Strategic laparoscopic surgery for improved cosmesis in general and bariatric surgery: analysis of initial 127 cases. J Laparo Endosc Adv Surg Tech. 2012;22(4):355–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sjostrom L. Review of the key results from the Swedish Obesity Subjects (SOS) trial—a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013;273:219–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Mr Patel, Ms Murgatroyd, Mr Sarma and Mr Chakravartty have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ameet G Patel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murgatroyd, B., Chakravartty, S., Sarma, D.R. et al. Two Hundred Seventy-Five Single-Incision Laparoscopic Gastric Band Insertions: What Have We Learnt?. OBES SURG 24, 1073–1077 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1208-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1208-z

Keywords

Navigation