Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting One and Three Month Postoperative Somatic Concerns, Psychological Distress, and Maladaptive Eating Behaviors in Bariatric Surgery Candidates with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF)

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 11 February 2014

Abstract

Background

Presurgical psychological screening of bariatric surgery candidates includes some form of standardized psychological assessment. However, associations between presurgical psychological screening and postoperative outcome have not been extensively studied. Here, we explore associations between presurgical Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scores and early postoperative Somatic Concerns, Psychological Distress, and Maladaptive Eating Behaviors.

Methods

The sample consisted of male (n = 238) and female (n = 621) patients who were administered the MMPI-2-RF at their presurgical psychological evaluation and received bariatric surgery. Patients were evaluated at their 1- and 3-month postoperative appointments.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that three latent constructs—somatic concerns, psychological distress, and maladaptive eating behaviors—were represented by responses to a postoperative assessment and that these constructs could be measured consistently over time. Presurgical scores on MMPI-2-RF scales measuring internalizing dysfunction were associated with more psychological distress at postoperative follow-ups, scores on scales measuring somatization were associated with more postoperative somatic concerns, and scores on scales assessing emotional/internalizing, behavioral/externalizing, cognitive complaints, and thought dysfunction prior to surgery were associated with maladaptive eating behaviors after surgery.

Conclusions

In conjunction with a presurgical psychological interview, the MMPI-2-RF provides information that can assist in anticipating postoperative outcomes and inform efforts to prevent them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sarwer DB, Allison KC, Bailer B, et al. Bariatric surgery. In: Block AR, Sarwer DB, editors. Presurgical psychological screening: understanding patients, improving outcomes. 1st ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mitchell JE, Selzer F, Kalarchian MA, et al. Psychopathology before surgery in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery-3 (LABS-3) psychosocial study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(5):533–41.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD, Levine MD, et al. Psychiatric disorders among bariatric surgery candidates: relationship to obesity and functional health status. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(2):328–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fabricatore AN, Crerand CE, Wadden TA, et al. How do mental health professionals evaluate candidates for bariatric surgery? Survey results. Obes Surg. 2006;16(5):567–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peterson CB, Berg K, Mitchell JE. Assessment of bariatric surgery candidates: structured interviews and self-report measures. In: Mitchell JE, de Zwann M, editors. Psychosocial assessment and treatment of bariatric surgery patients. 1st ed. New York: Routledge; 2012. p. 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Block AR, Sarwer DB. In: Block AR, Sarwer DB, editors. Presurgical psychological screening: understanding patients, improving outcomes. 1st ed. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2013.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Heinberg LJ. The Role of psychological testing for bariatric/metabolic surgery candidates. Bariatric times: clinical developments and metabolic insights in total bariatric patient care. 2013;10(2).

  8. Butcher JN, Graham JR, Ben-Porath YS, et al. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring. rev. ed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 2001.

  9. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD, Levine MD, et al. Relationship of psychiatric disorders to 6-month outcomes after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(4):544–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Semanscin-Doerr DA, Windover A, Ashton K, et al. Mood disorders in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients: does it affect early weight loss? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(2):191–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Powers PS, Rosemurgy A, Boyd F, et al. Outcome of gastric restriction procedures: weight, psychiatric diagnoses, and satisfaction. Obes Surg. 1997;7(6):471–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Colles SL, Dixon JB, O'Brien PE. Grazing and loss of control related to eating: two high-risk factors following bariatric surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(3):615–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD, Wilson GT, et al. Binge eating among gastric bypass patients at long-term follow-up. Obes Surg. 2002;12(2):270–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mitchell JE, Lancaster KL, Burgard MA, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients' status after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2001;11(4):464–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ben-Porath YS, Tellegen A. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2008/2011.

  17. Tellegen A, Ben-Porath YS. The Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF): technical manual. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2008/2011.

  18. Ben-Porath YS. Interpreting the MMPI-2-RF. 1st ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marek RJ, Ben-Porath YS, Ashton K, et al. Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory - 2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) scale score differences in bariatric surgery candidates diagnosed with binge eating disorder vs. BMI-matched controls. Int J Eat Disord. 2013. doi:10.1002/eat.22194.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marek RJ, Ben-Porath YS, Windover A, et al. Assessing psychosocial functioning of bariatric surgery candidates with the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF). Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1864–73. doi:10.1007/s11695-013-1024-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tarescavage AM, Wygant DB, Boutacoff LI, et al. Reliability, validity, and utility of the minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2-restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) in assessments of bariatric surgery candidates. Psychol Assess. 2013;25(4):1179–94. doi:10.1037/a0033694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wygant DB, Boutacoff LI, Arbisi PA, et al. Examination of the MMPI-2 restructured clinical (RC) scales in a sample of bariatric surgery candidates. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2007;14(3):197–205. doi:10.1007/s10880-007-9073-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Markon KE, Krueger RF, Watson D. Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integrative hierarchical approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;88(1):139–57.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sellbom M, Ben-Porath YS, Bagby RM. On the hierarchical structure of mood and anxiety disorders: confirmatory evidence and elaboration of a model of temperament markers. J Pers Disord. 2007;22:291–312.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user's guide. 6th ed. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 1998–2011.

  26. Flora DB, Curran PJ. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol Methods. 2004;9(4):466–91.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tucker LR, Lewis C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1973;38(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Steiger JH. Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivar Behav Res. 1990;25(2):173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993. p. 136–62.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods. 2000;3(1):4–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 2007;14(3):464–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, et al. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hare RD, Neumann CS. The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: development, structural properties, and new directions. In: Patrick C, editor. Handbook of psychopathy. New York: Guilford Press; 2006. p. 58–90.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gunstad J, Mueller A, Stanek K, et al., editors. Cognitive dysfunction in obesity: implications for bariatric surgery patients. 1st ed. New York: Routledge; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Galioto R, Gunstad J, Heinberg LJ, et al. Adherence and weight loss outcomes in bariatric surgery: does cognitive function play a role? Obes Surg. 2013;23(10):1703–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, et al. Is social support associated with greater weight loss after bariatric surgery?: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2011;12(2):142–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Garcia S, Fedor A, Spitznagel MB, et al. Patient reports of cognitive problems are not associated with neuropsychological test performance in bariatric surgery candidates. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;9(5):797–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Yossef Ben-Porath is a paid consultant to the MMPI-2-RF publisher, the University of Minnesota and Distributor, Pearson. As co-author of the MMPI-2-RF, he receives royalties on sales of the test.

Disclosure

Portions of this manuscript were presented at the 75th Annual Society for Personality Assessment (March 2013) in San Diego, CA, as part of an integrated paper session titled: Using Advanced Quantitative Methods to Examine the Validity of MMPI-2-RF Scale Scores.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan J. Marek.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

PDF 43.8 kb

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marek, R.J., Ben-Porath, Y.S., Merrell, J. et al. Predicting One and Three Month Postoperative Somatic Concerns, Psychological Distress, and Maladaptive Eating Behaviors in Bariatric Surgery Candidates with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF). OBES SURG 24, 631–639 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1149-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1149-y

Keywords

Navigation