Skip to main content

The EMPOWER Study: Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial of Vagal Blockade to Induce Weight Loss in Morbid Obesity

Abstract

Background

Intermittent, reversible intraabdominal vagal blockade (VBLOC® Therapy) demonstrated clinically important weight loss in feasibility trials. EMPOWER, a randomized, double-blind, prospective, controlled trial was conducted in USA and Australia.

Methods

Five hundred three subjects were enrolled at 15 centers. After informed consent, 294 subjects were implanted with the vagal blocking system and randomized to the treated (n = 192) or control (n = 102) group. Main outcome measures were percent excess weight loss (percent EWL) at 12 months and serious adverse events. Subjects controlled duration of therapy using an external power source; therapy involved a programmed algorithm of electrical energy delivered to the subdiaphragmatic vagal nerves to inhibit afferent/efferent vagal transmission. Devices in both groups performed regular, low-energy safety checks. Data are mean ± SEM.

Results

Study subjects consisted of 90 % females, body mass index of 41 ± 1 kg/m2, and age of 46 ± 1 years. Device-related complications occurred in 3 % of subjects. There was no mortality. 12-month percent EWL was 17 ± 2 % for the treated and 16 ± 2 % for the control group. Weight loss was related linearly to hours of device use; treated and controls with ≥12 h/day use achieved 30 ± 4 and 22 ± 8 % EWL, respectively.

Conclusions

VBLOC® therapy to treat morbid obesity was safe, but weight loss was not greater in treated compared to controls; clinically important weight loss, however, was related to hours of device use. Post-study analysis suggested that the system electrical safety checks (low charge delivered via the system for electrical impedance, safety, and diagnostic checks) may have contributed to weight loss in the control group.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Camilleri M, Toouli J, Herrera MF, et al. Intra-abdominal vagal blocking (VBLOC therapy): clinical results with a new implantable medical device. Surgery. 2008;143:723–31.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Shikora SA, Bergenstal R, Bessler M, et al. Implantable gastric stimulation for the treatment of clinically severe obesity: results of the SHAPE trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:31–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    NIH Consensus Development Program. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Reprinted from NIH Consensus Development Conference Statement. 1991 March 25–27;9(1).

  4. 4.

    US Dept. of Health and Human Services. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on the prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure (JNC-7). NIH Publication No. 03–5233, 2003.

  5. 5.

    Stubbs RJ, Hughes DA, Johnstone AM, et al. The use of visual analogue scales to assess motivation to eat in human subjects: a review of their reliability and validity with an evaluation of new hand-held computerized systems for temporal tracking of appetite ratings. Br J Nutr. 2000;84:405–15.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Stunkard AJ, Messick S. The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29:71–83.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The Moss 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–63.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Kosloski KD, et al. Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9:102–11.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. 2nd ed. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, et al. SAS system for mixed models. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Camilleri M, Toouli J, Herrera MF, et al. Selection of electrical algorithms to treat obesity with intermittent vagal block using an implantable medical device. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:224–30.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. New Eng J Med. 2007;357(8):741–52.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tweden KS, Anvari M, Bierk MD, et al. Vagal blocking for obesity control (VBLOC): concordance of effects of very high frequency blocking current at the neural and organ levels using two preclinical models. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:A-148.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tweden KS, Sarr MG, Bierk MD, et al. Vagal blocking for obesity control (VBLOC): studies of pancreatic and gastric function and safety in a porcine model. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2006;2:301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Financial disclosure

This study was funded entirely by EnteroMedics Inc, St. Paul, MN.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael G. Sarr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarr, M.G., Billington, C.J., Brancatisano, R. et al. The EMPOWER Study: Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial of Vagal Blockade to Induce Weight Loss in Morbid Obesity. OBES SURG 22, 1771–1782 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0751-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Morbid obesity
  • Vagal modulation
  • Vagal blockade
  • Neuromodulation
  • Weight loss
  • Satiety
  • Blood pressure