Obesity Surgery

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 722–729 | Cite as

Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy for Body Contouring and Spot Fat Reduction

  • Mary K. Caruso-Davis
  • Thomas S. Guillot
  • Vinod K. Podichetty
  • Nazar Mashtalir
  • Nikhil V. Dhurandhar
  • Olga Dubuisson
  • Ying Yu
  • Frank L. Greenway
Clinical Research



Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is commonly used in medical applications, but scientific studies of its efficacy and the mechanism by which it causes loss of fat from fat cells for body contouring are lacking. This study examined the effectiveness and mechanism by which 635–680 nm LLLT acts as a non-invasive body contouring intervention method.


Forty healthy men and women ages 18–65 years with a BMI <30 kg/m2 were randomized 1:1 to laser or control treatment. Subject's waistlines were treated 30 min twice a week for 4 weeks. Standardized waist circumference measurements and photographs were taken before and after treatments 1, 3, and 8. Subjects were asked not to change their diet or exercise habits. In vitro assays were conducted to determine cell lysis, glycerol, and triglyceride release.


Data were analyzed for those with body weight fluctuations within 1.5 kg during 4 weeks of the study. Each treatment gave a 0.4–0.5 cm loss in waist girth. Cumulative girth loss after 4 weeks was −2.15 cm (−0.78 ± 2.82 vs. 1.35 ± 2.64 cm for the control group, p < 0.05). A blinded evaluation of standardized pictures showed statistically significant cosmetic improvement after 4 weeks of laser treatment. In vitro studies suggested that laser treatment increases fat loss from adipocytes by release of triglycerides, without inducing lipolysis or cell lysis.


LLLT achieved safe and significant girth loss sustained over repeated treatments and cumulative over 4 weeks of eight treatments. The girth loss from the waist gave clinically and statistically significant cosmetic improvement.


Cold laser Fat reduction Low-level laser therapy Non-invasive laser 



This study was supported by a grant from Meridian Medical, Inc. Mary Katherine Caruso-Davis received support for her assistantship through the Bissoon Mesotherapy Foundation. The mechanistic in vitro studies were partially supported by a CNRU Center Grant # 1P30 DK072476 entitled “Nutritional Programming: Environmental and Molecular Interactions”, sponsored by NIDDK with the assistance of Jeffrey Gimble, M.D., Ph.D. and Ying Yu, MS. The authors wish to thank Eleanor Meador for coordinating the study and performing the LAPEX 2000 LipoLaser treatments, Lindsay Southard and Canaan Heard, undergraduates working on the study, and Mary Beth Burnett who assisted in manuscript preparation.


  1. 1.
    King PR. Low level laser therapy: a review. Lasers Med Sci. 1989;4:141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Neira R, Arroyave J, Ramirez H, et al. Fat liquefaction: effect of low-level laser energy on adipose tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:912–22. discussion 923–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benedicenti A, Verrando M, Cherlone F, et al. Effect of a 904 nm laser on microcirculation and arteriovenous circulation as evaluated using telethermographic imaging. Parodontol Stomatol (Nuova). 1984;23:167–78.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dortbudak O, Haas R, Mallath-Pokorny G. Biostimulation of bone marrow cells with a diode soft laser. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:540–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garavello-Freitas I, Baranauskas V, Joazeiro PP, et al. Low-power laser irradiation improves histomorphometrical parameters and bone matrix organization during tibia wound healing in rats. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2003;70:81–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hall G, Anneroth G, Schennings T, et al. Effect of low level energy laser irradiation on wound healing. An experimental study in rats. Swed Dent J. 1994;18:29–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mester E, Mester AF, Mester A. The biomedical effects of laser application. Lasers Surg Med. 1985;5:31–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campana V, Moya M, Gavotto A, et al. Effects of diclofenac sodium and He:Ne laser irradiation on plasmatic fibrinogen levels in inflammatory processes. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1998;16:317–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caruso MK, Pekarovic S, Raum WJ, et al. Topical fat reduction from the waist. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007;9:300–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bunnell BA, Estes BT, Guilak F, et al. Differentiation of adipose stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;456:155–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rogers PM, Fusinski KA, Rathod MA, et al. Human adenovirus Ad-36 induces adipogenesis via its E4 orf-1 gene. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32:397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karu T. Photobiological fundamentals of low power laser therapy. IEEE J Quantum Electron. 1987;23:1703–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robinson MF, Watson PE. Day-to-day variations in body-weight of young women. Br J Nutr. 1965;19:225–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gay-Crosier F, Polla LL, Tschopp J, et al. Complement activation by pulsed tunable dye laser in normal skin and hemangioma. J Invest Dermatol. 1990;94:426–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dhami LD, Agarwal M. Safe total corporal contouring with large-volume liposuction for the obese patient. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006;30:574–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary K. Caruso-Davis
    • 1
  • Thomas S. Guillot
    • 2
  • Vinod K. Podichetty
    • 3
  • Nazar Mashtalir
    • 4
  • Nikhil V. Dhurandhar
    • 4
  • Olga Dubuisson
    • 4
  • Ying Yu
    • 4
  • Frank L. Greenway
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Human EcologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryBaton RougeUSA
  3. 3.Research Practice PartnersMiramarUSA
  4. 4.Pennington Biomedical Research CenterLouisiana State University SystemBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations