Skip to main content
Log in

Results and Complications after Swedish Adjustable Gastric Banding—10 Years Experience

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bariatric surgery is currently the only effective treatment for morbid obesity. The main advantage of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is that this operation is minimally invasive to the stomach and adjustable to the patient’s needs. Few long-term studies on Swedish adjustable gastric banding (SAGB) have been published. We here report our 10-year experience with 785 SAGB procedures.

Methods

Between January 1996 and January 2006, 785 consecutive patients (81% women, 19% men) underwent laparoscopic SAGB. All data (demographic and morphologic, operative, and annual follow-up data) were prospectively collected in a computerized data bank. The postoperative follow-up program was performed largely by residents while 30 different surgeons performed the operation.

Results

Follow up data were available for 733 patients (98.3%); 52 patients (6.6%) were lost to follow-up. The median follow-up was 3.0 years (range, 1–10 years). The median total weight loss was 26 kg after 1 year and 40.5 kg after 8 years with a median EWL of 65.5% after 8 years. The median BMI decreased from 42.9 to 28.3 kg/m2. A total number of 688 complications occurred in 396 patients (50.4%). The most common complications were esophagitis (28.8%), pouch dilation (15.3%), esophageal dilation (12.5%), port problems (11%), band migration (6.5%), and band leakage (6.4%). Overall, 251 reoperations (32%) were performed. There was no mortality.

Conclusions

From our 10-year experience, we can state that SAGB is an effective bariatric procedure for achieving weight loss. Because of the high complication and reoperation rate, it is necessary to select patients according to specific criteria for gastric banding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Milone L, Daud A, Durak E, et al. Esophageal dilation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1482–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark TG, Altman DG, De Stavola BL. Quantification of the completeness of follow-up. Lancet. 2002;359:1309–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mittermair R, Weiss H, Nehoda H, et al. Laparoscopic Swedish adjustable gastric banding: 6-year follow-up and comparison to other laparoscopic bariatric procedures. Obes Surg. 2003;13:412–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chevallier JM, Zinzindohoue F, Douard R, et al. Complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: experience with 1,000 patients over 7 years. Obes Surg. 2004;14:407–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiner R, Blanco-Endert R, Weiner S, et al. Outcome after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding—8 years experience. Obes Surg. 2003;13:427–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Balsiger B, Ernst D, Giachino D, et al. Prospective evaluation and 7-year follow-up of Swedish adjustable gastric banding in adults with extreme obesity. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:1470–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Naef M, Naef U, Mouton W, et al. Outcome and complications after laparoscopic Swedish adjustable gastric banding: 5-year results of a prospective clinical trial. Obes Surg. 2007;17:195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tolonen P, Victorzon M, Mäkelä J. 11-year experience with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity—What happened to the first 123 patients? Obes Surg. 2008;18:251–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Biagini J, Karam L. Ten years experience with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2008;18:573–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weiss H, Nehoda H, Labeck B, et al. Injection port complications after gastric banding: incidence, management and prevention. Obes Surg. 2000;10:259–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shapiro K, Patel S, Abdo Z, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: is there a learning curve? Surg Endosc. 2004;18:48–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Suter M, Calmes J, Paroz A, et al. A 10-year experience with laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: high long-term complication and failure rates. Obes Surg. 2006;16:829–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Christou N, Look D, Maclean L. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244:734–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Brien P, McPhail T, Chaston T, et al. Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1032–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Brien P, Dixon J. Lap-Band: outcomes and results. J Lap Adv Surg Tech. 2003;13:265–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Klaus A, Gruber I, Wetscher G, et al. Prevalent esophageal body motility disorders underlie aggravation of GERD symptoms in morbidly obese patients following adjustable gastric banding. Arch Surg. 2006;141:247–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhard P. Mittermair.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mittermair, R.P., Obermüller, S., Perathoner, A. et al. Results and Complications after Swedish Adjustable Gastric Banding—10 Years Experience. OBES SURG 19, 1636–1641 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9967-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9967-7

Keywords

Navigation