Abstract
Background
Socioeconomic factors (SEF) influence bariatric surgery access and outcomes perhaps because of variations in patient knowledge and behaviors. This study examines the associations between income, formal education, race, health insurance, employment status, and patient self-educational and behavioral activities prior to bariatric surgery.
Methods
From March 2005 through January 2006, we surveyed 127 individuals who contacted our office seeking bariatric surgery. Study participants were asked to report their income, formal education, health insurance, employment status, height, weight, and standard demographic data. The type and number of self-educational resources utilized were elicited; a description of current eating and exercise behaviors was obtained; and an objective assessment (OA) of knowledge of the risks of both obesity and bariatric procedures was completed.
Results
The most valuable self-educational resource cited by respondents was the internet (41.2%) and was unaffected by SEF. Individuals who were employed, privately insured, white, and earning ≥$20,000/year reported using a greater number of self-educational resources than their peers, while subjects who were privately insured, had higher formal educational levels, and earned ≥$20,000/year demonstrated greater proficiency on the OA instrument. Engagement in healthy eating and exercise behaviors was unaffected by any SEF. On multivariate analysis, higher income was the sole significant factor directly related to the number of educational resources utilized and proficiency on OA.
Conclusion
Obese patients from lower-income households may benefit from additional preoperative education. All individuals, regardless of socioeconomic factors, must be encouraged to implement healthy eating and exercise behaviors preoperatively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chang VW, Lauderdale DS. Income disparities in body mass index and obesity in the United States, 1971–2002. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(18):2122–8.
Paeratakul S, Lovejoy JC, Ryan DH, et al. The relation of gender, race and socioeconomic status to obesity and obesity comorbidities in a sample of US adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26(9):1205–10.
Durkin AJ, Bloomston M, Murr MM, et al. Financial status does not predict weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 1999;9(6):524–6.
Livingston EH, Ko CY. Socioeconomic characteristics of the population eligible for obesity surgery. Surgery. 2004;135(3):288–96.
Martin LF, Tan TL, Holmes PA, et al. Preoperative insurance status influences postoperative complication rates for gastric bypass. Am J Surg. 1991;161(6):625–34.
Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002;288(14):1723–7.
Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.
Smoot TM, Xu P, Hilsenrath P, et al. Gastric bypass surgery in the United States, 1998–2002. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(7):1187–9.
Nguyen NT, Silver M, Robinson M, et al. Result of a national audit of bariatric surgery performed at academic centers: a 2004 University HealthSystem Consortium Benchmarking Project. Arch Surg. 2006;141(5):445–9. discussion 449-50.
O'Brien PE, Dixon JB, Laurie C, et al. Treatment of mild to moderate obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or an intensive medical program: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(9):625–33.
Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294(15):1909–17.
Farrell TM, Haggerty SP, Overby DW, et al. Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(5):930–49.
NIH. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(12):956–61.
Laville M, Romon M, Chavrier G, et al. Recommendations regarding obesity surgery. Obes Surg. 2005;15(10):1476–80.
Melissas J. IFSO guidelines for safety, quality, and excellence in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2008;18(5):497–500.
Mechanick JI, Kushner RF, Sugerman HJ, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(5 Suppl):S109–84.
Carbonell AM, Lincourt AE, Matthews BD, et al. National study of the effect of patient and hospital characteristics on bariatric surgery outcomes. Am Surg. 2005;71(4):308–14.
Hamoui N, Lake J, Beart RW, et al. Patterns of internet use: bariatric versus colorectal patients in a private institution. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199(2):223–8.
Makar B, Quilliot D, Zarnegar R, et al. What is the quality of information about bariatric surgery on the internet? Obes Surg. 2008;18(11):1455–9.
Salant T, Santry HP. Internet marketing of bariatric surgery: contemporary trends in the medicalization of obesity. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(10):2445–57.
Madan AK, Frantzides CT, Pesce CE. The quality of information about laparoscopic bariatric surgery on the Internet. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(5):685–7.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
There was no financial or material support provided to the authors towards the writing of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work is original, and the manuscript has not been published previously nor is under consideration by another journal.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balduf, L.M., Kohn, G.P., Galanko, J.A. et al. The Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Patient Preparation for Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 19, 1089–1095 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9889-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9889-4