Skip to main content
Log in

Virtual Three-dimensional Computed Tomography Assessment of the Gastric Pouch Following Laparoscopic Roux-Y Gastric Bypass

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The construction of the gastric pouch during surgery is largely based on the prevailing dogma of Roux-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. The scarce data that exist suggest that the smaller the gastric pouch, the greater the weight loss after surgery. Current estimations of pouch volume have inherent limitations. We describe the use of virtual three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) to assess pouch volume in the immediate postoperative period.

Methods

We performed 3D CT on three patients 1 day after laparoscopic RYGB using a 16-channel multidetector CT scan. Effervescent granules were administered, along with 1 oz of water, orally to achieve gastric pouch distension. Transaxial images were transferred to the 3D workstation (Vitrea, Vital Images, Inc.) and endoluminal views of the gastric pouch were generated with perspective volume rendering. Pouch area was also measured from the standard postoperative upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast study.

Results

All three patients were female, with a mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) of 43.7 kg/m2 and a mean age of 44.3 years. Mean pouch height was 4.07 cm, mean pouch width was 3.79 cm, and mean pouch depth was 2.1 cm. The mean calculated pouch volume was 31.6 cm3. The calculated pouch area using 3D CT was statistically indistinct from the pouch area calculated using the UGI study (15.2 cm2 vs 16.9 cm2; p = 0.549.)

Conclusion

For the first time, we describe the use of 3D CT to accurately measure postoperative pouch volume. In addition, we were able to confirm the utility of area (postoperative UGI) as an accurate surrogate for pouch volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belle SH, Berk PD, Courcoulas, et al. Safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery: longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:116–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S. Laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81:1145–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ros PR, Ji H. Special focus session: multisection (multidetector) CT: applications in the abdomen. Radiographics. 2002;22:697–700.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berland LL, Smith JK. Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. Radiology. 1998;209:327–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rydberg J, Buckwalter KA, Caldemeyer KS, et al. Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics. 2000;20:1787–806.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts K, Duffy A, Kaufman J, et al. Size matters: gastric pouch size correlates with weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1397–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Halverson JD, Koehler RE. Gastric bypass: analysis of weight loss and factors determining success. Surgery. 1981;90:446–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Forsell P. Pouch volume, stoma diameter and weight loss in Swedish adjustable gastric banding (SAGB). Obes Surg. 1996;6:468–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Bell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alva, S., Eisenberg, D., Duffy, A. et al. Virtual Three-dimensional Computed Tomography Assessment of the Gastric Pouch Following Laparoscopic Roux-Y Gastric Bypass. OBES SURG 18, 364–366 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9438-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9438-6

Keywords

Navigation