Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as an Alternative to Gastric Bypass in Patients with Multiple Intraabdominal Adhesions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and its indications are currently being evaluated. The objective of this study was to show the preliminary results obtained with this technique indicated as an alternative to gastric bypass in patients with multiple intraabdominal adhesions, therefore preserving the benefits of the laparoscopic approach.

Methods

An analysis of all patients who underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the above indication was done. Data included demographics, number of previous surgeries, operative time, morbidity, mortality, and %EWL at 3 and 6 months.

Results

Fifteen patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an alternative to gastric bypass because of multiple intraabdominal adhesions. No patient required conversion to an open procedure; morbidity was 6% with no mortality. %EWL at 3 months was 41% and at 6 months was 44%. Mean follow-up was 6 months.

Conclusion

In our initial experience, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy proved to be a safe and effective alternative to gastric bypass for patients with multiple intraabdominal adhesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almogy G, Crookes P, Anthony G. Longitudinal gastrectomy as a treatment for the high-risk super-obese patient. Obes Surg. 2004;14:492–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Milone L, Strong V, Gagner M. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is superior to intragastric balloon as a first stage procedure for super-obese patients (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2). Obes Surg. 2005;15:612–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baltasar A, Serra C, Pérez N, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multi-purpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1124–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nguyen N, Longoria M, Geldfand D, et al. Staged laparoscopic Roux-en-Y: a novel two-stage bariatric operation as an alternative in the super-obese with massively enlarged liver. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1077–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadière G. A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results alter 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1450–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernante P, Foletto M, Busetto L, et al. Feasibility of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revision procedure for prior laparoscopic gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1327–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roa P, Kaidar-Person O, Pinto D, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as treatment for morbid obesity: technique and short-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1323–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Draft Statement on Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity. Obes Surg 1991;1:257–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutter M, Randall S, Khuri S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity. A multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 2006;243(5):657–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Luján J, Frutos D, Hernández Q, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity. A randomized prospective study. Ann Surg. 2004;239(4):433–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Puzziferri N, Austrheim-Smith I, Wolfe B, et al. Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;243(2):181–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Azagra J, Goergen M, Anzay J, et al. Laparoscopic gastric reduction surgery. Preliminary results of a randomized, prospective trial of laparoscopic versus open vertical banded gastroplasty. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(6):555–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. De Wit L, Mathus-Vliegen L, Hey C, et al. Open versus laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding. A prospective randomized trial for treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 1999;230(6):800–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Westling A, Gustavsson S. Laparoscopic vs. open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective randomized trial. Obes Surg. 2001;11:284–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Buchwald H. A bariatric surgery algorithm. Obes Surg. 2002;12:733–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernabé Matías Quesada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quesada, B.M., Roff, H.E., Kohan, G. et al. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as an Alternative to Gastric Bypass in Patients with Multiple Intraabdominal Adhesions. OBES SURG 18, 566–568 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9302-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9302-0

Keywords

Navigation