Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and its indications are currently being evaluated. The objective of this study was to show the preliminary results obtained with this technique indicated as an alternative to gastric bypass in patients with multiple intraabdominal adhesions, therefore preserving the benefits of the laparoscopic approach.
Methods
An analysis of all patients who underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the above indication was done. Data included demographics, number of previous surgeries, operative time, morbidity, mortality, and %EWL at 3 and 6 months.
Results
Fifteen patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an alternative to gastric bypass because of multiple intraabdominal adhesions. No patient required conversion to an open procedure; morbidity was 6% with no mortality. %EWL at 3 months was 41% and at 6 months was 44%. Mean follow-up was 6 months.
Conclusion
In our initial experience, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy proved to be a safe and effective alternative to gastric bypass for patients with multiple intraabdominal adhesions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almogy G, Crookes P, Anthony G. Longitudinal gastrectomy as a treatment for the high-risk super-obese patient. Obes Surg. 2004;14:492–7.
Milone L, Strong V, Gagner M. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is superior to intragastric balloon as a first stage procedure for super-obese patients (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2). Obes Surg. 2005;15:612–7.
Baltasar A, Serra C, Pérez N, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multi-purpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1124–8.
Nguyen N, Longoria M, Geldfand D, et al. Staged laparoscopic Roux-en-Y: a novel two-stage bariatric operation as an alternative in the super-obese with massively enlarged liver. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1077–81.
Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadière G. A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results alter 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1450–6.
Bernante P, Foletto M, Busetto L, et al. Feasibility of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revision procedure for prior laparoscopic gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1327–30.
Roa P, Kaidar-Person O, Pinto D, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as treatment for morbid obesity: technique and short-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1323–6.
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Draft Statement on Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity. Obes Surg 1991;1:257–65.
Hutter M, Randall S, Khuri S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity. A multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 2006;243(5):657–66.
Luján J, Frutos D, Hernández Q, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity. A randomized prospective study. Ann Surg. 2004;239(4):433–7.
Puzziferri N, Austrheim-Smith I, Wolfe B, et al. Three-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;243(2):181–8.
Azagra J, Goergen M, Anzay J, et al. Laparoscopic gastric reduction surgery. Preliminary results of a randomized, prospective trial of laparoscopic versus open vertical banded gastroplasty. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(6):555–8.
De Wit L, Mathus-Vliegen L, Hey C, et al. Open versus laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding. A prospective randomized trial for treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 1999;230(6):800–7.
Westling A, Gustavsson S. Laparoscopic vs. open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective randomized trial. Obes Surg. 2001;11:284–92.
Buchwald H. A bariatric surgery algorithm. Obes Surg. 2002;12:733–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quesada, B.M., Roff, H.E., Kohan, G. et al. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as an Alternative to Gastric Bypass in Patients with Multiple Intraabdominal Adhesions. OBES SURG 18, 566–568 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9302-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9302-0