Abstract
Proximal duodenal–ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy is a new bariatric technique based on the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch in which after the sleeve gastrectomy, the duodenum is anastomosed to the ileum in a Billroth-II fashion. A 200-cm common channel-alimentary limb is devised. Anticipating an appropriate weight loss, at least similar to that obtained after gastric bypass, theoretical benefits for operated patients are a shorter operative time, the performance of only one anastomosis, and no mesentery opening. A prospective trial is now being conducted to find out the results of the procedure and to compare them to those obtained with gastric bypass and standard duodenal switch.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jones KB, Afram JD, Benotti PN, et al. Open versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study of over 25000 open cases and the major laparoscopic bariatric reported series. Obes Surg 2006;16:721–7.
Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, et al. Early experience with two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super-super obese patient. Obes Surg 2003;13:861–4.
Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1274 cases. Obes Surg 2001;11:276–80.
Hess DS, Hess DV. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg 1998;8:267–82.
Marceau P, Hould FS, Simard S, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. World J Surg 1998;22:947–54.
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Pérez-Aguirre E, Díez-Valladares L, et al. “Right-angled” stapled latero-lateral duodeno-jejunal anastomosis in the duodenal switch. Obes Surg 2005;15:700–2.
Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T. Complications of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 1040 patients. What have we learned? Obes Surg 2000;10:509–13.
Higa KD, Ho T, Boone KB. Internal hernias after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: incidence, treatment and prevention. Obes Surg 2003;13:350–4.
Fisher BL, Buchwald H, Clark W, et al. Mini-gastric bypass controversy. Obes Surg 2001;11:773–7.
Rutledge RL. Mini-gastric bypass controversy. Obes Surg 2001;11:773–7.
Johnson WH, Fernandez AZ, Farrell TM, et al. Surgical revision of loop (“mini”) gastric bypass procedure: multicenter review of complications and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2007;3:37–41.
Payne JH, DeWind L, Schwab CE, et al. Surgical treatment of morbid obesity. Sixteen years of experience. Arch Surg 1973;106:432–7.
Miskowiak J, Andersen B. Bypass revision in unsatisfactory weight loss after jejunoileal bypass for morbid obesity. Scand J Gastroenterol 1982;17:317–9.
Deitel M, Shahi B, Anand PK, et al. Long-term outcome in a series of jejunoileal bypass patients. Obes Surg 1993;3:247–52.
Wiklund B, Hallberg D. Experiences with antireflux valves in jejunoileal bypass surgery. Acta Chir Scand 1985;151:159–62.
Mason EE, Printen KJ, Hartford CE, et al. Optimizing results of gastric bypass. Ann Surg 1975;182:405–13.
Carbajo M, García-Caballero M, Toledano M, et al. One-anastomosis gastric bypass by laparoscopy: results of the first 209 patients. Obes Surg 2005;15:398–404.
Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity. A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 2005;242:20–8.
Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, et al. Early experience with two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super-super obese patient. Obes Surg 2003;13:861–4.
Baltasar A, Serra C, Pérez N, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multi-purpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg 2005;15:1124–8.
Acknowledgment
The present work has been financed by a grant of the Medical Foundation of the Mutua Madrileña del Automovilista.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sánchez-Pernaute, A., Rubio Herrera, M.A., Pérez-Aguirre, E. et al. Proximal Duodenal–Ileal End-to-Side Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy: Proposed Technique. OBES SURG 17, 1614–1618 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9287-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9287-8