Obesity Surgery

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 400–405 | Cite as

Obesity Surgery in England: An Examination of the Health Episode Statistics 1996–2005

  • Louisa J. Ells
  • Neil Macknight
  • John R. Wilkinson
Article

Background

The authors examined the uptake of obesity surgery across England.

Methods

Data were analyzed from the Hospital Episode Statistics covering all 9 goverment office regions with a total population of 49.1 million. The data analyzed covered 9 years 1996/97 – 2004/05.

Results

1,465 records were identified with a primary diagnostic code for obesityand an operation code for obesity surgery. The surgery was performed mostly in women (male to female ratio of 1:5), who were predominantly mid-aged (average 40.4 years ± SD 9.00), the majority of whom reside in local authority districts ranked within the lowest two deprivation quintiles. The availability of obesity surgery varied considerably across the 9 different regions of England, although the number of operations increased nationally over time.

Conclusions

Access to this intervention is highly variable and does not appear to reflect estimated regional differences in morbid obesity. This specialist service may benefit from more effective national organization, to ensure appropriate capacity and eliminate inequalities in service delivery.

Key words

Obesity surgery Morbid obesity Hospital data England 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    WHO. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 894. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_894.pdf
  2. 2.
    Pi-Sunyer FX. The medical risks of obesity. Obes Surg 2002; 12 (Suppl 1): 6S–11S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rennie KL, Jebb SA. Prevalence of obesity in Great Britain. Obes Rev 2005; 6: 11–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Santry DS, Gillen HP, Lauderdale DL. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 2005; 294: 1909–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joint Health Surveys Unit on behalf of the Department of Health. Health survey for England, London: Stationery Office, 2004. http://www.ic.nhs.uk/pubs/hlthsvyeng2004upd
  6. 6.
    National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guide on the use of surgery to aid weight reduction for people with morbid obesity. London; 2002 July 1. Report No 46. http://www.nice.org.uk/
  7. 7.
    Directions to Primary Care Trusts and NHS trusts in England concerning the arrangements for the Funding of Technology Appraisal Guidelines from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence – National Health Service Act 1997. 2003. 2006. http://www.nice.org.uk/
  8. 8.
    Colquitt J, Clegg A, Loveman E et al. Surgery for morbid obesity. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 4. http://www.cochrane.org/
  9. 9.
    Wilkinson JR, Summerbell CD, Macknight N, Bailey K, Chappel DB. Use of surgery to aid weight reduction - experience of two regions of Northern England: a database study. Int J Obes 2005; 29: 204–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Tabular list of classification of surgical procedure (Fourth Revision). The Stationery Office: London; 1997. http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/clinicalcoding/classifications/opcs_4
  11. 11.
    Department of Health. Specialised Morbid Obesity Services (all ages) – Definitions No 35, 2004. www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/01/96/14/04019614.pdf
  12. 12.
    Department of Communities and Local Government. The English Indices of Deprivation. The Stationery Office 2004. http://www.communities.gov.uk/
  13. 13.
    Association of Public Health Observatories. Indications of Public health in the English Regions 4: Ethnicity and Health. 2006. http://www.apho.org.uk/apho/
  14. 14.
    Leffler E, Gustavsson S, Karlson BM. Time trends in obesity surgery 1987 through 1996 in Sweden – a population based study. Obes Surg 2000; 10: 543–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Laville M, Romon M, Chavrier G et al. Recommendations regarding obesity surgery. Obes Surg 2005; 15; 1476–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rand CS, Kuldau JM. Morbid obesity: a comparison between a general population and obesity surgery patients. Int J Obes 1993; 17: 657–61.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buchwald H, Williams SE. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2003. Obes Surg 2004; 14: 1157–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ackroyd R, Mouiel J, Chevallier J-M et al. Costeffectiveness and budget impact of obesity surgery in patients with type-2 diabetes in three European countries. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 1488–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giusti V, Suter M, Horaief E et al. Rising role of obesity surgery caused by increase of morbid obesity, failure of conventional treatments and unrealistic expectations. Obes Surg 2003; 13: 693–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fried M, Hainer V, Basdevant A et al. Interdisciplinary European Guidelines for Surgery of Severe (Morbid) Obesity. Obes Surg 2007; 17: 260–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louisa J. Ells
    • 1
  • Neil Macknight
    • 1
  • John R. Wilkinson
    • 1
  1. 1.North-East Public Health Observatory, Wolfson Research InstituteUniversity of Durham Queen’s CampusStockton on TeesUK

Personalised recommendations