Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recovery of water-soluble materials after distillation of sage (Salvia officinalis L.) and the use of materials in the production of cake and ice cream

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sage (Salvia officinalis L.) is an important medicinal plant from the family of Lamiaceae and is known for its medicinal properties. There are certain ways to separate essential oil of sage, among them hydrodistillation by far the most used industrial techcnique. Hydrodistillation generates a by-product called hydrosol which contain valuable components particularly phenolics. In this research, essential oil of dried sage leaves were separated by hydrodistillation. Hydrosol fraction of sage (SHF) was dried by spray dryer with the aid of maltodextrin. The obtained sage hydrosol powder (SHP) was incorporated into ice cream and cake formulations at the rates of 0.5, 1 and 2% in order to enrich the products. Ice creams displayed higher results than cakes at any enrichment level. The highest scores in antioxidant capacity related tests were observed in samples enriched with 2% SHP. Total phenolic contents of 2% SHP enriched ice cream and cake were 111.03 and 28.95 mg/100 g, respectively. At equal enrichment level by SHP, ice cream samples displayed higher antioxidant capacity results than cake samples for both tests (DPPH and ABTS). This indicated the deteriorative effects of high cooking temperature applied in cake preparation on phenolics of SHP. Moreover, although the results of DPPH and ABTS assays were expressed using the same units (mg TEAC/100 g), DPPH results were higher than that of ABTS, which indicated higher reaction rate of antioxidants with DPPH compared to ABTS. Among the enriched samples, 0.5% SHP enriched ice cream and 0.5% SHP enriched cake displayed the highest overall acceptability score with 7.39 and 6.38, respectively. In most cases, sensory attributes of 0.5% SHP enriched ice cream and cake were not different (p > 0.05) from their respective control samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. B.C. Şenkal, A. İpek, C. Cesur, H. Doğan, I. Int, Bozok Symp. Proc. B. 4, 84–96 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Torun, A. Topuz, A. Akdoğan, H. Şahin, Ö. Feramuz, Food Congr. Proc. 37, 183–186 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Arıduru, G. Arabacı, Sakarya Univ. J. Sci. 2, 241–246 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Karakuş, H. Baydar, S. Erbaş, J. Fld. Crop. Cent. Res. Inst. 26, 99–104 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. D’Amato, A. Serio, C.C. López, A. Paparella, Food Control 86, 126–137 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. I. Ozturk, F. Tornuk, O. Caliskan-Aydogan, M.Z. Durak, O. Sagdic, Food Sci. Technol. 74, 48–54 (2016)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M.B. Mielnik, S. Sem, B. Egelandsdal, G. Skrede, Food Sci. Technol. 41, 93–100 (2008)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Granato, J.S. Santos, R.D. Salem, A.M. Mortazavian, R.S. Rocha, A.G. Cruz, Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 19, 1–7 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G.J. McDougall, Proc. Nutr. Soc. 76, 163–171 (2017)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. B.C. Ozkahraman, G. Sumnu, S. Sahin, J. Food Sci. Technol. 53, 1567–1575 (2016)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Çam, F. Erdoğan, D. Aslan, M. Dinç, J. Food Sci. 78, 1543–1550 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Lee, Y. Seong, B. Jeong, S. Yoon, I. Lee, Y. Jeong, J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 38, 1222–1228 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Li, C. Guo, J. Yang, J. Wei, J. Xu, S. Cheng, Food Chem. 96, 254–260 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Zhishen, T. Mengcheng, W. Jianming, Food Chem. 64, 555–559 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Brand-Williams, M.E. Cuvelier, C. Berset, Food Sci. Technol. 28, 25–30 (1995)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Re, N. Pellegrini, A. Proteggenete, A. Pannala, M. Yang, C. Evans, Free Radic. Biol. Med. 26, 1231–1237 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Sun-Waterhouse, L. Edmonds, S.S. Wadhwa, R. Wibisono, Food Res. Int. 50, 647–656 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. A.K. Yüksel, M. Yüksel, İG. Şat, J. Food. 42, 116–126 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. F.A. Masoodi, G.S. Chauhan, B. Sharma, Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 57, 121–128 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Majzoobi, Z. Vosooghi Poor, G. Mesbahi, J. Jamalian, A. Farahnaky, J. Text. Stud. 48, 616–623 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J.S. Park, Y.J. Lee, S.S. Chun, J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 39, 1509–1515 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Topkaya, F. Isik, J. Food Process. Preserv. 43, 1–11 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. B. Başyiğit, H. Alaşalvar, N. Doğan, C. Doğan, S. Berktaş, M. Çam, J. Food Meas. Charact. 14, 1671–1681 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H.İ Öztürk, T. Demirci, N. Akın, Food Sci. Technol. 90, 339–345 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Çam, N.C. Içyer, F. Erdoǧan, Food Sci. Technol. 55, 117–123 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. A.P. Ghandehari Yazdi, M. Barzegar, H. Ahmadi Gavlighi, M.A. Sahari, A.H. Mohammadian, Int. J. Dairy Technol. 73, 570–577 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Kamiloglu, G. Ozkan, H. Isik, O. Horoz, J. Van Camp, E. Capanoglu, Food Sci. Technol. 77, 475–481 (2017)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. M.L. Sudha, V. Baskaran, K. Leelavathi, Food Chem. 104, 686–692 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. L. A. Gremski, A. L. K. Coelho, J. S. Santos, H. Daguer, L. Molognoni, L. do Prado-Silva, A. S. Sant’Ana, R. da Silva Rocha, M. C. da Silva, A. G. Cruz, L. Azevedo, M. A. V. do Carmo, M. Wen, L. Zhang, D. Granato, Food Chem. 298, 125098 (2019).

  30. U. Złotek, Food Chem. 243, 168–174 (2018)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Erciyes University Scientific Research Project Unit under the Project No FYL-2017-7032.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasemin İncegül.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

İncegül, Y., Çam, M. Recovery of water-soluble materials after distillation of sage (Salvia officinalis L.) and the use of materials in the production of cake and ice cream. Food Measure 15, 2688–2694 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00851-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00851-8

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Mustafa Çam