Advertisement

Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 1630–1639 | Cite as

Effect of modified cassava starch as a fat replacer on the texture and quality characteristics of muffins

  • Eduardo Rodriguez-SandovalEmail author
  • Isai Prasca-Sierra
  • Victor Hernandez
Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of modified cassava starch as a partial fat replacer on the quality characteristics of muffins. Cross-linked cassava starch (CCS) was used to replace fat at 8, 12 and 16% substitution levels, based on the total weight of the wheat flour. The thermal properties of the CCS and wheat flour were assessed, and the pasting and farinographic properties of the wheat flour-CCS mixtures were also evaluated. The addition of CCS had an adverse effect on the dough stability and development time, which decreased as the amount of CCS increased in the mixture. The gelatinization and retrogradation entalphies of the CCS were higher than those of the wheat flour. The final and setback viscosities of the wheat flour were higher than those of the wheat flour-CCS mixtures. Furthermore, the quality and textural characteristics of the muffins were determined. There were no significant differences in the weight loss, specific volume, crumb moisture content or color parameters of the muffins. The muffins containing CCS at fat replacement levels of 8% (T8) had the textural properties that were closest to those of the muffins without the CCS (control sample). Thus, this sample was chosen to evaluate the storage behavior over 7 days along with the control muffins. The T8 samples had a higher crumb firmness during the storage. There were no significant differences in the overall acceptability of the T8 and control muffins on days 2 and 4 of the storage. So, the T8 muffins had good acceptability by consumers despite having a higher firmness during the storage.

Keywords

Reduced-fat muffin Modified cassava starch Texture Rheology Thermal properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

COLCIENCIAS is acknowledged for its financial support through project FP44842-485-2014.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Martínez-Cervera, A. Salvador, T. Sanz, Cellulose ether emulsions as fat replacers in muffins: Rheological, thermal and textural properties. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 63(2), 1083–1090 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Struck, L. Gundel, S. Zahn, H. Rohm, Fiber enriched reduced sugar muffins made from iso-viscous batters. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 65, 32–38 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P.M. Scheuer, B. Mattioni, M.P.L. Barreto, F.M. Montenegro, C.R. Gomes-Ruffi, S. Biondi, M. Kilpp, A. De Francisco, Effects of fat replacement on properties of whole wheat bread. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 50(4), 703–712 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.J. Chung, S.E. Lee, J.A. Han, S.T. Lim, Physical properties of dry-heated octenyl succinylated waxy corn starches and its application in fat-reduced muffin. J. Cereal Sci. 52(3), 496–501 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Zahn, F. Pepke, H. Rohm, Effect of inulin as a fat replacer on texture and sensory properties of muffins. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 45(12), 2531–2537 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Miyazaki, P. Van Hung, T. Maeda, N. Morita, Recent advances in application of modified starches for breadmaking. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 17, 591–599 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Zhu, Composition, structure, physicochemical properties, and modifications of cassava starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 122, 456–480 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Van Hung, N. Morita, Thermal and rheological properties of dough and bread as affected by various cross-linked cornstarch substitutions. Starch/Stärke 57, 540–546 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis, ed. by Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (AOAC, Gaithersburg, 1997), p. 946Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    International Standards: ISO 10520, Determination of Starch Content—Ewers Polarimetric Method, ed. by International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (ISO, Geneva, 1997), p. 4Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.J. McGrance, H.J. Cornell, C.J. Rix, A simple and rapid colorimetric method for the determination of amylose in starch products. Starch/Stärke 50(4), 158–163 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H.-J. Koo, S.-H. Park, J. Jo, B.-Y. Kim, M.-Y. Baik, Gelatinization and retrogradation of 6-year-old korean ginseng starches studied by DSC. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 38(1), 59–65 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Sangseethong, N. Termvejsayanon, K. Sriroth, Characterization of physicochemical properties of hypochlorite- and peroxide-oxidized cassava starches. Carbohydr. Polym. 82(2), 446–453 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    AACC, Approved Methods of Analysis, 10th edn. ed by American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC) (AACC St Paul, 2000), p. 520Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E.T. Quayson, W. Atwell, C.F. Morris, A. Marti, Empirical rheology and pasting properties of soft-textured durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) and hard-textured common wheat (T. aestivum). J. Cereal Sci. 69, 252–258 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. Rodriguez-Sandoval, L.Y. Polanía-Gaviria, G. Lorenzo, Effect of dried cassava bagasse on the baking properties of composite wheat bread. J. Texture Stud. 48, 76–84 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Baixauli, T. Sanz, A. Salvador, S.M. Fiszman, Muffins with resistant starch: baking performance in relation to the rheological properties of the batter. J. Cereal Sci. 47(3), 502–509 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Rajiv, C. Soumya, D. Indrani, G. Venkateswara Rao, Effect of replacement of wheat flour with finger millet flour (Eleusine corcana) on the batter microscopy, rheology and quality characteristics of muffins. J. Texture Stud. 42(6), 478–489 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. Goswami, R.K. Gupta, D. Mridula, M. Sharma, S.K. Tyagi, Barnyard millet based muffins: physical, textural and sensory properties. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 64(1), 374–380 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    I. Marcet, B. Paredes, M. Díaz, Egg yolk granules as low-cholesterol replacer of whole egg yolk in the preparation of gluten-free muffins. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 62(1), 613–619 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    K. Marston, H. Khouryieh, F. Aramouni, Effect of heat treatment of sorghum flour on the functional properties of gluten-free bread and cake. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 65, 637–644 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. Xue, M. Ngadi, Thermal properties of batter systems formulated by combinations of different flours. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 40(8), 1459–1465 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    I.S.M. Zaidul, H. Yamauchi, C. Matsuura-Endo, S. Takigawa, T. Noda, Thermal analysis of mixtures of wheat flour and potato starches. Food Hydrocoll. 22, 499–504 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A.A. Karim, M.H. Norziah, C.C. Seow, Methods for the study of starch retrogradation. Food Chem. 71(1), 9–36 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    S. Abera, S.K. Rakshit, Processing technology comparison of physicochemical and functional properties of cassava starch extracted from fresh root and dry chips. Starch/Stärke 55(7), 287–296 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Ravi, R.S. Manohar, P.H. Rao, Use of rapid visco analyser (RVA) for measuring the pasting characteristics of wheat flour as influenced by additives. J. Sci. Food Agric. 79(12), 1571–1576 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Miyazaki, T. Maeda, N. Morita, Gelatinization properties and bread quality of flours substituted with hydroxypropylated, acetylated and phosphorylated cross-linked tapioca starches. J. Appl. Glycosci. 52(4), 345–350 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. Nindjin, G.N. Amani, M. Sindic, Effect of blend levels on composite wheat doughs performance made from yam and cassava native starches and bread quality. Carbohydr. Polym. 86(4), 1637–1645 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    P. Van Hung, N. Morita, Dough properties and bread quality of flours supplemented with cross-linked cornstarches. Food Res. Int. 37(5), 461–467 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    R. Krishnaiya, C. Kasar, S. Gupta, Influence of water chestnut (Trapa natans) on chemical, rheological, sensory and nutritional characteristics of muffins. J. Food Meas. Charact. 10(2), 210–219 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    R. Sun, Z. Zhang, X. Hu, Q. Xing, W. Zhuo, Effect of wheat germ flour addition on wheat flour, dough and Chinese steamed bread properties. J. Cereal Sci. 64, 153–158 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    R. Rumiyati, A.P. James, V. Jayasena, Effects of lupin incorporation on the physical properties and stability of bioactive constituents in muffins. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 50(1), 103–110 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Gómez, F. Ronda, C.A. Blanco, P.A. Caballero, A. Apesteguía, Effect of dietary fibre on dough rheology and bread quality. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 216(1), 51–56 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    T. Sanz, A. Salvador, R. Baixauli, S.M. Fiszman, Evaluation of four types of resistant starch in muffins. II. Effects in texture, colour and consumer response. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 229(2), 197–204 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    J.A. Gray, J.N. BeMiller, Bread staling: molecular basis and control. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2(2), 1–21 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    C. Fadda, A.M. Sanguinetti, A. Del Caro, C. Collar, A. Piga, Bread staling: updating the view. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 13(4), 473–492 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    K. Acosta, G. Cavender, W.L. Kerr, Sensory and physical properties of muffins made with waxy whole wheat flour. J. Food Qual. 34(5), 343–351 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. Guarda, C. Rosell, C. Benedito, M. Galotto, Different hydrocolloids as bread improvers and antistaling agents. Food Hydrocoll. 18(2), 241–247 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Rodriguez-Sandoval
    • 1
    Email author
  • Isai Prasca-Sierra
    • 2
  • Victor Hernandez
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Alimentos, Facultad de Ciencias AgrariasUniversidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede MedellínMedellínColombia
  2. 2.Facultad de Ingenierías, Programa de Ingeniería AgroindustrialUniversidad de SucreSincelejoColombia
  3. 3.Alimentos y Productos en Polvo Poltec S.A.S.La EstrellaColombia

Personalised recommendations