Effect of drying temperatures on the phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of pears of Rocha variety (Pyrus communis L.)

  • Sandra C. R. V. L. Santos
  • Raquel P. F. GuinéEmail author
  • Ana Barros
Original Paper


The interest about phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity has been increasing in recent years, mainly due to their beneficial effects on human health, focusing on many different food products. In this way, and since pears are an important source of dietary intake of phenolic compounds with antioxidant activity, this work was done to evaluate the phenolic content and antioxidant activity of pears of cv. Rocha from five different locations and submitted to drying at different temperatures (40 and 60 °C). Although the amounts of phenolic compounds are not very much influenced by drying, the antioxidant capacity does suffer a very marked decrease with drying at both temperatures, when compared to that of the fresh pears. The HPLC analysis of the phenolic extracts allowed identifying some phenolic compounds present in the pears, such as arbutin, gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, syringic acid, protocatechuic acid, catechin and epicatechin. From the results obtained in this study it was concluded that the greatest variations occurred in the peel of the pears, as compared to the corresponding pulps. Furthermore, it was possible to observe that while total phenols and ortho-diphenols do not seem to be very affected by drying, the antioxidant capacity suffers a great decrease with drying, being this effect more pronounced when the drying temperature is increased.


Pear Rocha pear Drying Phenolic compounds Antioxidant activity 



Thanks are due to ‘PEst-C/QUI/UI0616/2011′ from the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia.


  1. 1.
    B. Halliwell, Free radicals, antioxidants and human disease: curiosity, cause or consequence. Lancet 344, 721–724 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Martins, S.I. Mussatto, G. Martínez-Avila, J. Montañez-Saenz, C.N. Aguilar, J.A. Teixeira, Bioactive phenolic compounds: production and extraction by solid-state fermentation: a review. Biotechnol. Adv. 29, 365–373 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Stratil, B. Klejdus, V. Kubán, Determination of phenolic compounds and their antioxidant activity in fruits and cereals. Talanta 71, 1741–1751 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Fitó, R. De La Torre, M.I. Covas, Olive oil and oxidative stress. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 51, 1215–1224 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O.I. Aruoma, M. Deiana, A. Jenner, B. Halliwell, H. Kaur, S. Banni, Effect of hydroxytyrosol found in extra virgin olive oil on oxidative DNA damage and on low-density lipoprotein oxidation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46, 5181–5187 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Visioli, A. Poli, C. Galli, Antioxidant and other biological activities of phenols from olives and olive oil. Med. Res. Rev. 22, 65–75 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.U. Lule, W. Xia, Food phenolics, pros and cons: a review. Food Rev. Int. 21, 367–388 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Chen, Z. Wang, J. Wu, Q. Wang, X. Hu, Chemical compositional characterization of eight pear cultivars grown in China. Food Chem. 104, 268–275 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.H. Ashoor, J.M. Kanox, Determination of organic acids in foods by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 299(2), 288–292 (1982)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.P.F. Guiné, Pear drying: experimental validation of a mathematical prediction model. Food Bioprod. Process. 86, 248–253 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Abreu, S. Beirão-da-Costa, E.M. Gonçalves, M.L. Beirão-da-Costa, M. Moldão-Martins, Use of mild heat pre-treatments for quality retention of freshcut ‘Rocha’ pear. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 30, 153–160 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Salta, A. Martins, R.G. Santos, N.R. Neng, J.M.F. Nogueira, J. Justino, A.P. Rauter, Phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of Rocha pear and other pear cultivars—a comparative study. J Funct. Foods 2, 53–157 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Schieber, P. Keller, R. Carle, Determination of phenolic acids and flavonoids of apple and pear by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 910, 265–273 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Ferreira, S. Guyot, N. Marnet, I. Delgadillo, C. Renard, M.A. Coimbra, Composition of phenolic compounds in a Portuguese pear (Pyrus communis L. Var. S. Bartolomeu) and changes after sun-drying. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50, 4537–4544 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. Shahidi, M. Naczk, Food Phenolics (Technomic Publishing Co, Lancaster, 1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Mateos, J.L. Espartero, M. Trujilho, J.J. Ríos, M. León-Camacho, F. Alcudia, Determination of phenols, flavones, and lignans in virgin olive oils by solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array ultraviolet detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49, 2185–2192 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Ozgen, R.N. Reese, A.Z. Tulio, J.C. Scheerens, A.R. Miller, Modified 2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) method to measure antioxidant capacity of selected small fruits and comparison to ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) methods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 1151–1157 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R.P.F. Guiné, R. Sousa, A. Alves, L. Teixeira, C. Figueiredo, S. Fonseca, Phenolic, dietetic fibre and sensorial analyses of apples from regional varieties produced in conventional and biological mode. Agric. Eng. Int. 12, 70–78 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    P.D. Drogoudi, Z. Michailidis, G. Pantelidi, Peel and flesh antioxidant content and harvest quality characteristics of seven apple cultivars. Sci. Hortic. 115, 149–153 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. Wolfe, X. Wu, R.H. Liu, Antioxidant activity and apple peels. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51, 609–614 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    C.T. Brett, K.W. Waldron, Physiology and Biochemistry of Plant Cell Walls, 2nd edn. (Chapman & Hall, Cambridge, 1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. Ferreira, J.A.L. Silva, G. Pinto, C. Santos, I. Delgadillo, M.A. Coimbra, Effect of sun-drying on microstructure and texture of S. Bartolomeu pears (Pyrus communis L.). Eur. Food Res. Technol. 226, 1545–1552 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. Ribeiro, J. Rangel, P. Valentão, P.B. Andrade, J.A. Pereira, H. Bolke, Organic acids in two Portuguese chestnut (Castanea sativa Miller) varieties. Food Chem. 100, 504–508 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra C. R. V. L. Santos
    • 1
  • Raquel P. F. Guiné
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ana Barros
    • 2
  1. 1.CI&DETS, Instituto Politécnico de ViseuESAV Quinta da AlagoaViseuPortugal
  2. 2.CQ – Centro de Química de Vila Real, Departamento de QuímicaUniversidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto DouroVila RealPortugal

Personalised recommendations