Periodic bottlenecks play a major role in shaping the adaptive dynamics of natural and laboratory populations of asexual microbes. Here we study how they affect the ‘Extent of Adaptation’ (EoA), in such populations. EoA, the average fitness gain relative to the ancestor, is the quantity of interest in a large number of microbial experimental-evolution studies which assume that for any given bottleneck size (N0) and number of generations between bottlenecks (g), the harmonic mean size (HM = N0g) will predict the ensuing evolutionary dynamics. However, there are no theoretical or empirical validations for HM being a good predictor of EoA. Using experimental-evolution with Escherichia coli and individual-based simulations, we show that HM fails to predict EoA (i.e., higher N0g does not lead to higher EoA). This is because although higher g allows populations to arrive at superior benefits by entailing increased variation, it also reduces the efficacy of selection, which lowers EoA. We show that EoA can be maximized in evolution experiments by either maximizing N0 and/or minimizing g. We also conjecture that N0/g is a better predictor of EoA than N0g. Our results call for a re-evaluation of the role of population size in predicting fitness trajectories. They also aid in predicting adaptation in asexual populations, which has important evolutionary, epidemiological and economic implications.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abdi, H. (2010). Holm’s sequential Bonferroni procedure. In Salkind, N. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n178
Abel, S., Abel zur Wiesch, P., Davis, B. M., & Waldor, M. K. (2015). Analysis of bottlenecks in experimental models of infection. PLoS Pathogens, 11(6), e1004823. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004823.
Barrick, J. E., Yu, D. S., Yoon, S. H., Jeong, H., Oh, T. K., Schneider, D., et al. (2009). Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Nature, 461(7268), 1243–1247. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08480.
Campos, P. R. A., & Wahl, L. M. (2009). The effects of population bottlenecks on clonal interference, and the adaptation effective population size. Evolution, 63(4), 950–958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00595.x.
Campos, P. R. A., & Wahl, L. M. (2010). The adaptation rate of asexuals: Deleterious mutations, clonal interference and population bottlenecks. Evolution, 64(7), 1973–1983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00981.x.
Charlesworth, B. (2009). Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10(3), 195–205.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Crow, J. F. (1958). Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Human Biology, 30(1), 1–13.
De Visser, J. A. G. M., & Rozen, D. E. (2005). Limits to adaptation in asexual populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18(4), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00879.x.
Desai, M. M., & Fisher, D. S. (2007). Beneficial mutation-selection balance and the effect of linkage on positive selection. Genetics, 176(3), 1759–1798.
Desai, M. M., Fisher, D. S., & Murray, A. W. (2007). The speed of evolution and maintenance of variation in asexual populations. Current Biology, 17(5), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.072.
Elena, S. F., Cooper, V. S., & Lenski, R. E. (1996). Punctuated evolution caused by selection of rare beneficial mutations. Science, 272(5269), 1802–1804. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5269.1802.
Eyre-Walker, A., & Keightley, P. D. (2007). The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8(8), 610–618. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2146.
Gerrish, P. J., & Lenski, R. E. (1998). The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population. Genetica, 102–103(0), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017067816551.
Heffernan, J. M., & Wahl, L. M. (2002). The effects of genetic drift in experimental evolution. Theoretical Population Biology, 62(4), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-5809(02)00002-3.
Karve, S. M., Bhave, D., Nevgi, D., & Dey, S. (2016). Escherichia coli populations adapt to complex, unpredictable fluctuations by minimizing trade-offs across environments. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 29(12), 2545–2555. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12972.
Karve, S. M., Daniel, S., Chavhan, Y. D., Anand, A., Kharola, S. S., & Dey, S. (2015). Escherichia coli populations in unpredictably fluctuating environments evolve to face novel stresses through enhanced efflux activity. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 28(5), 1131–1143. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12640.
Kassen, R. (2014). Experimental evolution and the nature of biodiversity. Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts and Company.
Kassen, R., & Bataillon, T. (2006). Distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations before selection in experimental populations of bacteria. Nature genetics, 38(4), 484–488. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1751.
Katju, V., Packard, L. B., Bu, L., Keightley, P. D., & Bergthorsson, U. (2015). Fitness decline in spontaneous mutation accumulation lines of Caenorhabditis elegans with varying effective population sizes. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 69(1), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12554.
Kawecki, T. J., Lenski, R. E., Ebert, D., Hollis, B., Olivieri, I., & Whitlock, M. C. (2012). Experimental evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27(10), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.06.001.
Kimura, M. (1983). The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LaBar, T., & Adami, C. (2016). Different evolutionary paths to complexity for small and large populations of digital organisms. PLoS Computational Biology, 12(12), e1005066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005066.
Lachapelle, J., Reid, J., & Colegrave, N. (2015). Repeatability of adaptation in experimental populations of different sizes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 282(1805), 20143033. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.3033.
Lanfear, R., Kokko, H., & Eyre-Walker, A. (2014). Population size and the rate of evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.009.
Lenski, R. E., Rose, M. R., Simpson, S. C., & Tadler, S. C. (1991). Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. The American Naturalist, 138(6), 1315–1341.
Luria, S. E., & Delbrück, M. (1943). Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics, 28(6), 491–511.
Novak, M., Pfeiffer, T., Lenski, R. E., Sauer, U., & Bonhoeffer, S. (2006). Experimental tests for an evolutionary trade-off between growth rate and yield in E. coli. The American Naturalist, 168(2), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1086/an.2006.168.issue-2.
Orr, H. A. (2000). The rate of adaptation in asexuals. Genetics, 155(2), 961–968.
Patwa, Z., & Wahl, L. (2008). The fixation probability of beneficial mutations. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 5(28), 1279–1289. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0248.
Petit, N., & Barbadilla, A. (2009). Selection efficiency and effective population size in Drosophila species. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22(3), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01672.x.
Ramsayer, J., Kaltz, O., & Hochberg, M. E. (2013). Evolutionary rescue in populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens across an antibiotic gradient. Evolutionary Applications, 6(4), 608–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12046.
Raynes, Y., Gazzara, M. R., & Sniegowski, P. D. (2012). Contrasting dynamics of a mutator allele in asexual populations of differing size. Evolution, 66(7), 2329–2334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01577.x.
Raynes, Y., Halstead, A. L., & Sniegowski, P. D. (2014). The effect of population bottlenecks on mutation rate evolution in asexual populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27(1), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12284.
Rice, S. H. (2004). Evolutionary theory: Mathematical and conceptual foundations. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
Rozen, D. E., de Visser, J. A. G. M., & Gerrish, P. J. (2002). Fitness effects of fixed beneficial mutations in microbial populations. Current Biology, 12(12), 1040–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00896-5.
Rozen, D. E., Habets, M. G. J. L., Handel, A., & de Visser, J. A. G. M. (2008). Heterogeneous adaptive trajectories of small populations on complex fitness landscapes. PLoS ONE, 3(3), e1715. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001715.
Samani, P., & Bell, G. (2010). Adaptation of experimental yeast populations to stressful conditions in relation to population size. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23(4), 791–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01945.x.
Sniegowski, P. D., & Gerrish, P. J. (2010). Beneficial mutations and the dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1544), 1255–1263. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0290.
Szendro, I. G., Franke, J., de Visser, J. A. G. M., & Krug, J. (2013). Predictability of evolution depends nonmonotonically on population size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(2), 571–576. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213613110.
Tenaillon, O., Barrick, J. E., Ribeck, N., Deatherage, D. E., Blanchard, J. L., Dasgupta, A., et al. (2016). Tempo and mode of genome evolution in a 50,000-generation experiment. Nature, 535, 165.
Vogwill, T., Phillips, R. L., & Gifford, D. R. (2016). Divergent evolution peaks under intermediate population bottlenecks during bacterial experimental evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1835), 20160749. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0749.
Wahl, L. M., & Gerrish, P. J. (2001). The probability that beneficial mutations are lost in populations with periodic bottlenecks. Evolution, 55(12), 2606–2610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00772.x.
Wahl, L. M., Gerrish, P. J., & Saika-Voivod, I. (2002). Evaluating the impact of population bottlenecks in experimental evolution. Genetics, 162(2), 961–971.
Wahl, L. M., & Zhu, A. D. (2015). Survival probability of beneficial mutations in bacterial batch culture. Genetics, 200(1), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.172890.
Wang, J., Santiago, E., & Caballero, A. (2016). Prediction and estimation of effective population size. Heredity, 117(4), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2016.43.
Wilke, C. O. (2004). The speed of adaptation in large asexual populations. Genetics, 167(4), 2045–2053. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.027136.
We thank Milind Watve, M.S. Madhusudhan, Shraddha Karve and Sachit Daniel for their invaluable suggestions and insightful discussions. We thank Amitabh Joshi for critical comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. Y.D.C. was supported by a Senior Research Fellowship, initially sponsored by the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, and later by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India. S.I.A. thanks the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India for financial support through a KVPY fellowship. This project was supported by an external grant from Department of Biotechnology, Government of India and internal funding from Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune.
This study was funded by Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant No. BT/PR5655/BRB/10/1088/2012).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Chavhan, Y.D., Ali, S.I. & Dey, S. Larger Numbers Can Impede Adaptation in Asexual Populations despite Entailing Greater Genetic Variation. Evol Biol 46, 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-018-9467-6
- Population size
- Experimental evolution
- Extent of adaptation
- Population bottlenecks
- Adaptive size