Abstract
Nature has recently depicted the empirical advancements of the theory of evolution as a confrontation between “reformists”, that claim for an urgent rethinking of the standard neo-Darwinian approach including so far neglected factors and processes, and “conservatives” who reply “all is well” about the current evolutionary research programme based on genetic variation and natural selection. The fight is mainly around genetic reductionism, but it seems inconclusive. Reformists stress very important factors, but they are still missing a coherent proposal about the architecture of the future extended evolutionary theory. Conservative react defensively, relying just on non-essential add-ons to the old and stable neo-Darwinian core. We analyze the debate and we propose an interpretation. Evolutionary biology is a rapidly expanding field. The bone of contention is how to update and extend the central core of the Darwinian legacy. We propose here the idea that what is happening in the field today is a development of the evolutionary research programme, whose structure is composed of a set of compatible and integrated evolutionary patterns. Evolutionary biology has been extended over its history by the inclusion of more and more patterns, rather than by revision to core theory. Niles Eldredge’s “Hierarchy Theory” is an example of global structure (meta-theory) aiming at incorporating and unifying the currently observed evolutionary patterns.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayala, F. J., & Arp, R. (Eds.). (2010). Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology. New York: Wiley.
Callaway, E. (2015). Ethiopian jawbone may mark dawn of humankind. Nature,. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17039.
Carroll, S. B. (2005). Endless forms most beautiful. New York: Baror Int.
Coyne, J. A., & Orr, A. (2004). Speciation. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
Eldredge, N. (1985). Unfinished synthesis. Biological hierarchies and modern evolutionary thought. New York: Columbia University Press.
Eldredge, N. (1995). Reinventing Darwin. New York: Wiley.
Eldredge, N. (1999). The pattern of evolution. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Eldredge, N. (2008). Hierarchies and the sloshing bucket: Toward the unification of evolutionary biology. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1, 10–15.
Eldredge, N. (2015). Eternal ephemera. New York: Columbia University Press.
Eldredge, N., & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. J. M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in paleobiology (pp. 82–115). San Francisco: Freeman.
Eldredge, N., & Grene, M. (1992). Interactions. The biological context of social systems. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Grant, P., & Grant, R. (2008). How and why species multiply. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
Kimura, M. (1983). The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
Laland, K., Wray, G. A., Hoekstra, H. E., et al. (2014). Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature, 514, 161–164.
Minelli, A., & Pradeu, T. (Eds.). (2014). Towards a theory of development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nei, M. (2013). Mutation-driven evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Odling-Smee, J., Laland, K., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pagel, M., Venditti, C., & Meade, A. (2006). Large punctuational contribution of speciation to evolutionary divergence at the molecular level. Science, 314, 119–121.
Piacentini, L., Fanti, L., Specchia, V., Bozzetti, M. P., Berloco, M., Palombo, G., & Pimpinelli, S. (2014). Transposons, environmental changes, and heritable induced phenotypic variability. Chromosoma, 123, 345–354.
Pievani, T. (2012a). An evolving research programme: The structure of evolutionary theory from a Lakatosian perspective. In A. Fasolo (Ed.), The theory of evolution and its impact (pp. 211–228). New York: Springer.
Pievani, T. (2012b). Geoethics and philosophy of earth sciences: The role of geophysical factors in human evolution. Annals of Geophysics, 55(3), 349–353.
Pievani, T. (2013a). Individuals and groups in evolution: Darwinian pluralism and the multilevel selection debate. Journal of Biosciences, 38(4), 1–7.
Pievani, T. (2013b). Kinds of pluralism. Stephen J. Gould and the future of evolutionary theory. In G. A. Danieli, A. Minelli, & T. Pievani (Eds.), Stephen J. Gould 2002–2012: The scientific legacy (pp. 37–50). New York: Springer.
Pievani, T. (2015). Between skeptics and adaptationists: New prospects for human language evolution. Ciência & Ambiente, special issue on human evolution, Brasil (in press).
Pievani, T., & Parravicini, A. (2015). Multi-level human evolution: Ecological patterns in hominid phylogeny. Journal of Anthropological Sciences (in press).
Pievani, T., & Serrelli, E. (2013). Bucket thinking: The future framework for evolutionary explanation. Contrastes Revista Internacional de Filosofía, Suplemento, 18, 389–405.
Pigliucci, M., & Müller, G. B. (Eds.). (2010). Evolution: The extended synthesis. Boston: MIT Press.
Schmitz, R. J. (2014). The secret garden—Epigenetic alleles underlie complex traits. Science, 343, 1082–1083.
Sepkoski, D. (2012). Rereading the fossil record. The growth of paleobiology as an evolutionary discipline. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Somit, A., & Peterson, S. A. (Eds.). (1992). The dynamics of evolution. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Standen, E. M., Du, T. Y., & Larsson, H. C. E. (2014). Developmental plasticity and the origin of tetrapods. Nature, 513, 54–58.
Turner, D. (2011). Paleontology. A philosophical introduction. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
Vrba, E. S. (Ed.). (1985). Species and speciation (p. 4). Pretoria: Transvaal Museum Monographs.
Vrba, E. S. (2015). Role of environmental stimuli in hominid origins. In W. Henke & I. Tattersall (Eds.), Handbook of paleoanthropology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1837–1886). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
Waddington, C. H. (1959). Canalization of development and genetic assimilation of acquired characters. Nature, 183, 654–655.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pievani, T. How to Rethink Evolutionary Theory: A Plurality of Evolutionary Patterns. Evol Biol 43, 446–455 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-015-9338-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-015-9338-3