Abstract
The dynamics of biological communities are the result of social interactions among components that span multiple scales. In addition, differences between population-level dynamics and species-level dynamics are poorly understood and have generated ambiguity regarding the concepts of what constitutes a population and a species. In the present study, Dictyostelia was employed as a model community with which to clarify these concepts. The distributions of logarithmically ranked populations could be explained by unified neutral theory and a zero-sum patch game, while distributions of ranked species could not be explained by unified neutral theory. Furthermore, non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis and principal component analysis demonstrated that species occupied distinct niches, supporting the idea that species-level organization could be explained by adaptive structure, while population-level organization could be explained by unified neutral theory. Genetic structures of both populations and species, and the differences in the characteristic time scales of these communities, based on actual and deduced point mutation rates and speciation rates, were also examined. The results indicated that species of eastern Japanese Dictyostelia may have behaved adaptively over a long time scale, while populations may have behaved in accordance with unified neutral theory over a shorter time scale.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
19 August 2020
The original version of this article unfortunately contained an error. The authors would like to correct the error with this erratum.
References
Barnes, G. L. (2008). The making of the Japan sea and the Japanese mountains: Understanding Japan’s volcanism in structural context. Japan Review, 20, 3–52.
Bloomfield, G., Skelton, J., Ivens, A., Tanaka, Y., & Kay, R. R. (2010). Sex determination in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Science, 330, 1533–1536.
Bonner, J. T. (2009). The social amoebae. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
CBOL Plant Working Group. (2009). A DNA barcode for land plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 12794–12797.
Chave, J. (2004). Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecology Letters, 7, 241–253.
Coyne, J. A., & Orr, H. A. (2004). Speciation. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates Inc.
Dobzhansky, T. (1970). Genetics of the evolutionary process. New York: Columbia University Press.
Felsenstein, J. (1989). PHYLIP: Phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics, 5, 164–166.
Fortunato, A., Strassmann, J. E., Santorelli, L., & Queller, D. C. (2003). Co-occurrence in nature of different clones of the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum. Molecular Ecology, 12, 1031–1038.
Harte, J., Zillio, T., Conlisk, E., & Smith, A. B. (2008). Maximum entropy and the state-variable approach to macroecology. Ecology, 89, 2700–2711.
Hebert, P. D. N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L., & deWaard, J. R. (2003). Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 270, 313–321.
Hubbell, S. P. (2001). The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hutchinson, G. E. (1961). The paradox of the plankton. The American Naturalist, 95, 137–145.
Kimura, M. (1968). Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature, 217, 624–626.
Krebs, C. J. (1972). Ecology: The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. New York: Harper International.
Kuhner, M. K. (2006). LAMARC 2.0: Maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation of population parameters. Bioinformatics, 22, 768–770.
Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press.
McConnell, R., Middlemist, S., Scala, C., Strassmann, J. E., & Queller, D. C. (2007). An unusually low microsatellite mutation rate in Dictyostelium discoideum, an organism with unusually abundant microsatellites. Genetics, 177, 1499–1507.
McQueen, D. J. (1970). Laboratory studies of competition in two species of cellular slime molds; Dictyostelium discoideum and Polysphondylium pallidum. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia. Thesis.
Medlin, L., Elwood, H. J., Stickel, S., & Sogin, M. L. (1988). The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions. Gene, 71, 491–499.
O’Dwyer, J. P., & Green, J. L. (2010). Field theory for biogeography: A spatially explicit model for predicting patterns of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 13, 87–95.
Okamoto, T., & Hikida, T. (2012). A new cryptic species allied to Plestiodon japonicus (Peters, 1864) (Squamata: Scincidae) from eastern Japan, and diagnoses of the new species and two parapatric congeners based on morphology and DNA barcode. Zootaxa, 3436, 1–23.
Pueyo, S., He, F., & Zillio, T. (2007). The maximum entropy formalism and the idiosyncratic theory of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 10, 1017–1028.
Raper, K. B. (1984). The dictyostelids. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Roach, J. C., Glusman, G., Smit, A. F. A., Huff, C. D., Hubley, R., Shannon, P. T., et al. (2010). Analysis of genetic inheritance in a family quartet by whole-genome sequencing. Science, 328, 636–639.
Romeralo, M., Escalante, R., Sastre, L., & Lado, C. (2007). Molecular systematics of Dictyostelids: 5.8S ribosomal DNA and internal transcribed spacer region analyses. Eukaryotic Cell, 6, 110–116.
Sathe, S., Kaushik, S., Lalremruata, A., Aggarwal, R. K., Cavender, J. C., & Nanjundiah, V. (2010). Genetic heterogeneity in wild isolates of cellular slime mold social groups. Microbial Ecology, 60, 137–148.
Schaap, P., Winckler, T., Nelson, M., Alvarez-Curto, E., Elgie, B., Hagiwara, H., et al. (2006). Molecular phylogeny and evolution of morphology in the social amoebas. Science, 314, 661–663.
Verstrepen, K. J., Jansen, A., Lewitter, F., & Fink, G. R. (2005). Intragenic tandem repeats generate functional variability. Nature Genetics, 37, 986–990.
Waples, R. S., & Gaggiotti, O. (2006). What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Molecular Ecology, 15, 1419–1439.
Whitham, T. G., Bailey, J. K., Schweitzer, J. A., Shuster, S. M., Bangert, R. K., LeRoy, C. J., et al. (2006). A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7, 510–523.
Acknowledgments
The present study was primarily supported by the Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from The Japan Science Society. Support was also received from the Support Center for Advanced Medical Sciences, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School. I am grateful to Dr. Gareth Bloomfield (MRC L of Molecular Biology, UK) and the Dicty Stock Center (Northwestern University, USA) for providing me with both Dictyostelia strains and plasmids. I would like to thank the Silva database for allowing me to use the database for my analyses. I would also like to thank the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and Technology—Japan and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for the grants they provided, and the National Institute of Genetics—Japan/The University of Tokushima Graduate School for their financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adachi, S. Eastern Japanese Dictyostelia Species Adapt While Populations Exhibit Neutrality. Evol Biol 42, 210–222 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-015-9312-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-015-9312-0