Abstract
Bateman’s principles of sexual selection predict that the sex with “cheaper” gametes may maximize reproductive efforts by mating multiply and so display greater positive covariance between reproductive and mating success. We conducted a semi-controlled breeding experiment to genetically quantify sexual selection in adult Ambystoma texanum, a sexually monomorphic salamander with simple courtship behaviors. We used four polymorphic microsatellite loci to genotype 57 adults enclosed in a breeding wetland and compared their multilocus profiles to that of 862 embryos collected from the enclosure. The molecular data were used to assign parentage, investigate the mating system, and measure sexual selection intensity. Parentage analyses indicated 36% of dams and 93% of sires were genetically sampled via their gametes but physically unsampled, suggesting that a large number of breeders over-wintered within the enclosure and/or some females released into the enclosure were already inseminated. We used the genetic data to generate estimates of individual reproductive and mating success and we interpret these in light of salamander behavior and sexual selection theory. The incidence of multiple mating in females (86%) was considerably higher than in males (32%) and the standardized variance in mating success was significantly greater in females. The correlations between reproductive and mating success were significant and of similar magnitude between the sexes, indicating that both sexes increased reproductive success through increased mating success. This pattern may be a function of differential opportunities for mating success between the sexes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrade, M. C. B., & Kasumovic, M. M. (2005). Terminal investment strategies and male mate choice: Extreme tests of Bateman. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 45, 838–847.
Arnold, S. J. (1994). Bateman principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. The American Naturalist (Suppl. S.), 144, S126–S149.
Arnold, S. J., & Duvall, D. (1994). Animal mating systems—a synthesis based on selection theory. The American Naturalist, 143, 317–348.
Arnold, S. J., & Wade, M. J. (1984). On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Theory. Evolution, 38, 709–719.
Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349–368.
Garton, J. S. (1972). Courtship of the small-mouthed salamander, Ambystoma texanum, in southern Illinois. Herpetologica, 28, 41–45.
Gopurenko, D., Williams, R. N., McCormick, C. R., & DeWoody, J. A. (2006). Insights into the mating habits of the tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum tigrinum) as revealed by genetic parentage analyses. Molecular Ecology, 5, 1917–1928.
Harris, W. E., & Lucas, J. R. (2002). A state-based model of sperm allocation in a group-breeding salamander. Behavioral Ecology, 13, 705–712.
Herbinger, C. M., O’Reilly, P. T., & Verspoor, E. (2006). Unravelling first-generation pedigrees in wild endangered salmon populations using molecular genetic markers. Molecular Ecology, 15, 2261–2275.
Houck, L. K., & Arnold, S. J. (2003). Courtship and mating behavior. In D. M. Sever (Ed.), Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Urodela (pp. 383–424). Enfield, New Hampshire: Science Publishers Inc.
Howard, R. D. (1988). Reproductive success in two species of anurans. In T. H. Clutton-Brock (Ed.), Reproductive success (pp. 99–117). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Howard, R. D., Moorman, R. S., & Whiteman, H. H. (1997). Differential effects of mate competition and mate choice on eastern tiger salamanders. Animal Behaviour, 53, 1345–1356.
Janzen, F. J., & Brodie, E. D. III (1989). Tall tails and sexy males: Sexual behavior of rough-skinned newts (Taricha granulosa) in a natural breeding pond. Copeia, 1989, 1064–1067.
Jones, A. G., Arguello, J. R., & Arnold, S. J. (2002). Validation of Bateman’s principles: A genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 269, 2533–2539.
Jones, A. G., Arguello, J. R., & Arnold, S. J. (2004). Molecular parentage analysis in experimental newt populations: The response of mating system measures to variation in the operational sex ratio. The American Naturalist, 164, 444–456.
Jones, A. G., Rosenqvist, G., Berglund, A., & Avise, J. C. (2005). The measurement of sexual selection using Bateman’s principles: An experimental test in the sex-role-reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 45, 874–884.
Ketterson, E. D., Parker, P. G., Raouf, S. A., Nolan, V. J., Ziegenfus, C., & Chandler, C. R. (1998). The relative impact of exra-pair fertilizations on variation in male and female reproductive success in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). In P. G. Parker & N. T. Burley (Eds.), Avian reproduction tactics: Female and male perspectives (pp. 81–101). Lawrence, Kansas: Allen Press.
Licht, L. E., & Bogart, J. P. (1990). Courtship behavior of Ambystoma texanum on Pelee Island, Ontario. Journal of Herpetology, 24, 450–452.
McWilliams, S. R. (1992). Courtship behavior of the small-mouthed salamander (Ambystoma texanum): The effects of conspecific males on male mating tactics. Behaviour, 121, 3–19.
Myers, E. M., & Zamudio, K. R. (2004). Multiple paternity in an aggregate breeding amphibian: The effect of reproductive skew on estimates of male reproductive success. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1951–1963.
Olsson, M. (1993). Male preference for large females and assortative mating for body size in the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 32, 337–341.
Parker, G., Ball, M., Stockley, P., & Gage, M. (1996). Sperm competition games: Individual assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 263, 1291–1297.
Parker, P. G., & Tang-Martinez, Z. (2005). Bateman gradients in field and laboratory studies: A cautionary tale. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 45, 895–902.
Petranka, J. W. (1998). Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Regosin, J. V., Windmiller, B. S., Homan, R. N., & Reed, J. M. (2005). Variation in terrestrial habitat use by four pool-breeding amphibian species. Journal of Wildlife Management, 69, 1481–1493.
Semlitsch, R. D. (1998). Biological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pond breeding salamanders. Conservation Biology, 12, 1113–1119.
Slatkin, M. (1974). Hedging one’s evolutionary bets. Nature, 250, 704–705.
Stockley, P., Searle, J. B., MacDonald, D. W., & Jones, C. S. (1993). Female multiple mating behaviour in the common shrew as a strategy to reduce inbreeding. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 254, 173–179.
Summers, K., & Amos, W. (1997). Behavioural, ecological and molecular genetic analyses of reproductive strategies in the Amazonian dart-poison frog, Dendrobates ventrimaculatus. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 260–267.
Sutherland, W. J. (1985). Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and explain Bateman’s data. Animal Behaviour, 33, 1349–1352.
Tennessen, J. A., & Zamudio, K. R. (2003). Early male reproductive advantage, multiple paternity and sperm storage in an amphibian aggregate breeder. Molecular Ecology, 12, 1567–1576.
Trauth, S. E., Cox, R. L., Butterfield, B. P., Saugey, D. A., & Meshaka, W. E. (1990). Reproductive phenophases and clutch characteristics of selected Arkansas amphibians. Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science, 44, 107–113.
Twitty, V. C. (1966). Of scientists and salamanders. San Francisco, California: Freeman.
Verrell, P. A. (1989a). The sexual strategies of natural populations of newts and salamanders. Herpetology, 45, 265–281.
Verrell, P. A. (1989b). Male mate choice for fecund females in a plethodontid salamander. Animal Behaviour, 38, 1086–1088.
Verrell, P. A. (1995). Males choose larger females as mates in the salamander Desmognathus santeelah. Ethology, 99, 162–171.
Verrell, P., Halliday, T., & Griffiths, M. (1986). The annual reproductive cycle of the smooth newt (Triturus vulgaris) in England. Journal of Zoology, 210, 101–119.
Wade, M. J. (1979). Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. The American Naturalist, 114, 742–747.
Waser, P. M., & DeWoody, J. A. (2006). Multiple paternity in a philopatric rodent: The interaction of competition and choice. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 971–978.
Williams, P. K. (1973). Seasonal movements and population dynamics of four sympatric Mole Salamanders, genus Ambystoma. Ph.D. Dissertation. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Williams, R. N., & DeWoody, J. A. (2004). Fluorescent dUTP helps characterize 10 novel tetranucleoticde microsatellites from an enriched salamander (Ambystoma texanum) genomic library. Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 17–19.
Woolfenden, B. E., Gibbs, H. L., & Sealy, S. G. (2002). High opportunity for sexual selection in both sexes of an obligate brood parasitic bird, the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 52, 417–425.
Zar, J. (1999). Biostatistical analysis, 4th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Acknowledgments
We thank J. Barany for permission to conduct research at the South River Road field site and S. Baker, L. Sheets, and S. Hecht for help in collecting salamanders. This manuscript was greatly improved by suggestions from R. Howard, A. Jones, and members of the DeWoody laboratory. Thanks are extended to C. Herbinger for providing advice and access to computational resources required for various PEDIGREE analyses. This is Agricultural Research Programs contribution number 2007–18087 from Purdue University, supported by NSF award DEB-0514815 to J.A.D.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gopurenko, D., Williams, R.N. & DeWoody, J.A. Reproductive and Mating Success in the Small-Mouthed Salamander (Ambystoma texanum) Estimated via Microsatellite Parentage Analysis. Evol Biol 34, 130–139 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-007-9009-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-007-9009-0