Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

≪ 3es rencontres médecins-chirurgiens ≫ sur la chirurgie de l’obésité ≫ Obésité et grossesse. Le point de vue de l’obstétricien

Obesity and pregnancy. The obstetrician’s point of view

  • Dossier Thématique / Thematic File
  • Published:
Obésité

Résumé

Au cours de la grossesse, l’obésité augmente le risque de complications maternelles (hypertension artérielle [HTA] gravidique, diabète gestationnel) et fœtales (malformations, macrosomie). Les conditions de l’accouchement sont également plus difficiles avec plus de césariennes et d’échecs de l’analgésie péridurale. Une organisation spécifique au sein des réseaux périnataux doit permettre une prise en charge optimale de ces patientes en particulier en cas d’obésité morbide (OM).

Abstract

Obesity during pregnancy increases the risk of complications for both the mother (gestational hypertension, diabetes mellitus) and the newborn (malformations and macrosomia). Deliveries are also more difficult with more c-section and failure in peridural analgesia. A specific organization in the perinatal network should improve the management of these women, especially for morbid obesity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. Bellver J, Rossal LP, Bosch E, et al (2003) Obesity and the risk of spontaneous abortion after oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 79(5):1136–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pasquali R, Pelusi C, Genghini S, et al (2003) Obesity and reproductive disorders in women. Hum Reprod Update 9(4):359–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP, et al (2001) Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25(8):1175–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, et al (2005) Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 352(24):2477–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jensen DM, Damm P, Sorensen B, et al (2003) Pregnancy outcome and prepregnancy body mass index in 2,459 glucosetolerant Danish women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(1):239–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson HE, O’Connell CM, Joseph KS, McLeod NL (2005) Maternal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by obesity. Obstet Gynecol 106(6):1357–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Usha Kiran TS, Hemmadi S, Bethel J, Evans J (2005) Outcome of pregnancy in a woman with an increased body mass index. Bjog 112(6):768–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weiss JL, Malone FD, Emig D, et al (2004) Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate: a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190(4):1091–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson JW, Longmate JA, Frentzen B (1992) Excessive maternal weight and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167(2):353–70 (discussion 70-2)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore LL, Bradlee ML, Singer MR, et al (2003) Folate intake and the risk of neural tube defects: an estimation of dose-response. Epidemiology 14(2):200–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Watkins ML, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA, et al (2003) Maternal obesity and risk for birth defects. Pediatrics 111(5 part 2):1152–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Queisser-Luft A, Stolz G, Wiesel A, et al (2002) Malformations in newborn: results based on 30,940 infants and fetuses from the Mainz congenital birth defect monitoring system (1990–1998). Arch Gynecol Obstet 266(3):163–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hendler I, Blackwell SC, Bujold E, et al (2005) Suboptimal second-trimester ultrasonographic visualization of the fetal heart in obese women: should we repeat the examination? J Ultrasound Med 24(9):1205–9; quiz:10-1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolfe HM, Sokol RJ, Martier SM, Zador IE (1990) Maternal obesity: a potential source of error in sonographic prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 76(3 part 1):339–42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cnattingius S, Taube A (1998) Stillbirths and rate of neonatal deaths in 76,761 postterm pregnancies in Sweden, 1982–1991; a register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77(5):582–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. LaCoursiere DY, Bloebaum L, Duncan JD, Varner MW (2005) Population-based trends and correlates of maternal overweight and obesity, Utah 1991–2001. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(3):832–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Maternité Jeanne-de-Flandre, pôle d’obstétrique, CHRU de Lille, rue Jean-Charles-Borda, F-59000, Lille, France

    P. Deruelle

  2. Faculté de médecine Henri-Warembourg, université Lille Nord de France, F-59045, Lille cedex, France

    P. Deruelle

Authors
  1. P. Deruelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Deruelle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deruelle, P. ≪ 3es rencontres médecins-chirurgiens ≫ sur la chirurgie de l’obésité ≫ Obésité et grossesse. Le point de vue de l’obstétricien. Obes 4, 153–155 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11690-009-0197-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11690-009-0197-x

Mots clés

Keywords

Search

Navigation