Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Malaria Microscopy Diagnostic Performance at 40 Public Health Facilities in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire in 2020

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Parasitologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Microscopic diagnosis of Giemsa-stained thick and thin blood films remained the gold standard laboratory method for the diagnosis of malaria. In this context, we felt it was important to conduct this evaluation with 40 public medical biology laboratories (MBLs) in the Abidjan 1 health region that perform blood parasitology tests to improve their implementation process.

Methods

This descriptive and analytical study took place in July 2020 and involved participating laboratories (PLs) from the public sector in Abidjan. A set of 3 blood smear slides of variable parasite densities (PDs) with assigned values (AVs) of parasite densities and assigned Plasmodium species was used. The criterion for establishing the parasite density compliance interval was assigned values of ± 25%, and the performance rates were compared to the 80% recommended by the WHO for the African region.

Results

Nearly a quarter (11/40) of the participating laboratories had a compliance rate greater than 80%, including 10 with a performance of 100% for the ability to identify parasites. Regarding identifying plasmodial species, a concordance rate of 100% was obtained for slide 1 for Plasmodium falciparum, while this rate was 20% for slide 2 for Plasmodium ovale. For parasite densities < 200/µl, 87.5% of the participating laboratories (PLs) had a performance rate lower than 80%, while 95% of these PLs had a performance rate higher than 80% for parasitaemia > 2000/µl.

Conclusions

There is a need to strengthen adapted to low parasitaemia, to improve the biological confirmation of malaria in Côte d’Ivoire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset generated during and/or analysed during the current study are vailable from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. WHO (2022) World malaria report. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. WHO (2020) World malaria report 2020. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  3. WHO (2017) Malaria microscopy quality assurance manual—version 2. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ministère de la Santé et de la Lutte contre le SIDA de Côte d’Ivoire (2008) Directives de prise en charge du paludisme. Abidjan. PNLP, pp 14–15

  5. Ministère de la Santé et de la Lutte contre le SIDA de Côte d’Ivoire (2000) Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme. Abidjan. Rapport d’activité, pp 10–33

  6. Payne D (1998) Use and limitations of light microscopy for diagnosing malaria at the primary health care level. Bull World Health Organ 66:621–626 (PMID: 2463112; PMCID: PMC2491188)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moody A (2002) Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria parasites. Clin Microbiol Rev 15(1):66–78 (PMID: 11781267; PMCID: PMC118060)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (2012) Manuel de formation des Techniciens de Laboratoire sur le diagnostic biologique du paludisme. Abidjan, pp 30–37

  9. Harchut K, Standley C, Dobson A et al (2013) Over-diagnosis of malaria by microscopy in the Kilombero Valley, Southern Tanzania: an evaluation of the utility and cost-efectiveness of rapid diagnostic tests. Malar J 12:159 (PMID: 23663437; PMCID: PMC3689637)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ngasala B, Mubi M, Warsame M et al (2008) Impact of training in clinical and microscopy diagnosis of childhood malaria on antimalarial drug prescription and health outcome at primary health care level in Tanzania: a randomized controlled trial. Malar J 7:199 (PMID: 18831737; PMCID: PMC2566575)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. WHO (2010) World malaria report 2010. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  12. D’Acremont V, Malila A, Swai N et al (2010) Withholding antimalarials in febrile children who have a negative result for a rapid diagnostic test. Clin Infect Dis 51:506–511. https://doi.org/10.1086/655688. (PMID: 20642354)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Njama-Meya D, Clark TD, Nzarubara B et al (2007) Treatment of malaria restricted to laboratory-confirmed cases: a prospective cohort study in Ugandan children. Malar J 6:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bedia-Tanoh AV, Konaté A, Gnagne AP et al (2021) Effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in pregnant women in San Pedro Côte D’Ivoire. Pathog Glob Health 115(5):325–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/20477724.2021.1903141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Menan EIH, Yavo W, Oga SSA et al (2007) Evaluation externe de la qualité du diagnostic biologique du paludisme réalisée dans 19 laboratoires du secteur public de la ville d’Abidjan (Côte d’Ivoire). J Sci Pharm Biol 8:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  16. Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme (2020) Plan National de Suivi et évaluation de la lutte contre le paludisme 2021–2025. PNLP

  17. Cnops L, Van Esbroeck M, Bottieau E, Jacobs J (2010) Giemsa-stained thick blood films as a source of DNA for Plasmodium species-specific real-time PCR. Malar J 22(9):370. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cnops L, Jacobs J, Van Esbroeck M (2011) Validation of a four-primer real-time PCR as a diagnostic tool for single and mixed Plasmodium infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 17:1101–1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03344.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. OMS Afrique (2015) Lignes directrices de l’OMS relatives au processus graduel d’amélioration des laboratoires en vue de l’accréditation (SLIPTA) dans la région africaine (accompagnées d’une liste de contrôle). Brazzaville

  20. Carter J (2017) External Quality Assessment in Laboratory Medicine: external quality assessment in resource–limited countries. Biochem Med 27(1):97–109. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dorkenoo AM, Kouassi KC, Afanyibo YG et al (2021) External quality assessment of thick and thin blood smear slides for the diagnosis of malaria in the Lomé and Gulf Health Districts of Togo. Med Trop Sante Int 1(1):S1SQ-3476. https://doi.org/10.48327/S1SQ-3476

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ngasala B, Bushukatale S (2019) Evaluation of malaria microscopy diagnostic performance at private health facilities in Tanzania. Malar J 18(1):375. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2998-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jemere KA, Melaku MY, Jemeber TH et al (2018) Performance evaluation of laboratory professionals on malaria microscopy at health facilities in Bahir Dar city administration Northwest Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 13:e0203420. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yitbarek T, Nega D, Tasew G (2016) Performance evaluation of malaria microscopists at defense health facilities in Addis Ababa and its surrounding areas Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 11:e0166170. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mukadi P, Lejon V, Barbé B (2016) Performance of microscopy for the diagnosis of malaria and human African trypanosomiasis by diagnostic laboratories in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: results of a nation-wide external quality assessment. PLoS ONE 11(1):e0146450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KKF, KEGM, MAJS, GNKA, VBTA and AKE: contributed to the design of the study and analyzed the research data. KA, VBAH and KBPCM: provided additional articles related to the topic. KKF, DV, YW and MEIH: wrote the review which was then read and approved by all the other authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kassi Kondo Fulgence.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fulgence, K.K., Massafoma, K.E.G., Sebastien, M.A.J. et al. Evaluation of Malaria Microscopy Diagnostic Performance at 40 Public Health Facilities in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire in 2020. Acta Parasit. 69, 541–548 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-023-00754-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-023-00754-2

Keywords

Navigation