Abstract
Purpose
Visceral schistosomosis is an economically important trematode infection caused by Schistosoma spindale and S. indicum in among ruminants. The lack of sensitive diagnostic tools has often led to underestimation of the prevalence in live animals. A sensitive copro-PCR targeting partial mitochondrial gene was developed to detect Schistosoma spp. However, this protocol could not differentiate between the two species. This study was conducted to explore the possibility of species differentiation using restriction fragment length polymorphism of PCR products (PCR- RFLP).
Methods
Polymerase chain reaction was carried out to amplify mitochondrial gene of adult S. spindale and S. indicum. Copro PCR was done with schistosome-positive faecal samples. A novel PCR–RFLP was designed targeting the Hpy166II recognition sequence in the mitochondrial gene sequence of S. indicum.
Result
The PCR using primers targeting the mitochondrial gene of S. spindale and S. indicum amplified a distinct product of approximately 454 bp with adult fluke as well as faecal DNA, which upon RFLP with Hpy166II yielded 330 bp and 124 bp products with S. indicum amplicons alone.
Conclusion
The novel PCR–RFLP possesses the potential to be used in epidemiological surveys among bovines and in snail intermediate hosts to screen for S. spindale and S. indicum infection.
References
Agarwal MC, Southgate VR (2000) Schistosoma spindale and bovine schistosomosis. J Vet Parasitol 14:95–107
Dargie JD (1980) The impact on production and mechanisms of pathogenesis of trematode infections in cattle and sheep. Int J Parasitol 17:453–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7519(87)90121-4
Mc Cauley EH, Majid AA, Tayeb A (1984) Economic evaluation of the production impact of bovine schistosomiasis and vaccination in Sudan. Prev Vet Med 6:735–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(84)90030-8
Hussein HM, El-Tonsy MM, Tawfik RA, Ahmed SAEG (2012) Experimental study for early diagnosis of prepatent schistosomiasis mansoni by detection of free circulating DNA in serum. Parasitol res 111(1):475–478
Sandoval N, Siles-Lucas M, Peres-Arellano JL, Carranza C, Puente S, Lopez-Aban J, Muro A (2006) A new PCR-based approach for the specific amplification of DNA from different Schistosoma species applicable to human urine samples. Parasitology 133:581–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182006000898
Gobert GN, Chai M, Duke M, McManus DP (2005) Copro-PCR based detection of Schistosoma eggs using mitochondrial DNA markers. Mol Cell Probes 19:250–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2005.01.006
Barber KE, Mkoji GM, Loker ES (2000) PCR-RFLP analysis of the ITS2 region to identify Schistosoma haematobium and S. bovis from Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg 62(4):434–440. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2000.62.434
Akinwale OP, Laurent T, Mertens P, Leclipteux T, Rollinson D, Kane R, Emery A, Ajayi MB, Akande DO, Fesobi TW (2008) Detection of schistosomes polymerase chain reaction amplified DNA by oligochromatographic dipstick. Mol Biochem Parasitol 160(2):167–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.04.003
Webster BL, Rollinson D, Stothard JR, Huyse T (2010) Rapid diagnostic multiplex PCR (RD-PCR) to discriminate Schistosoma haematobium and S. bovis. J Helminthol 84(1):107–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X09990447
Lakshmanan B, Devada K, Joseph S, Aravindakshan TV, Sabu L (2016) Copro-PCR based detection of bovine Schistosome infection in India. J Helminthol 90(1):102–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X1400090X
Kumar V (1999) Trematode infections and diseases of man and animals. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, p 362p
Lakshmanan B, Devada K, Joseph S, Gleeja VL, Aravindakshan TV, Himachala K, Sankar S (2018) Seroprevalence of bovine intestinal schistosomosis in different agro-ecological zones of south India using excretory–secretory antigen based ELISA. Vet Parasitol 262:51–55
Agrawal MC, Rao VG (2011) Indian Schistosomes: a need for further investigations. J Parasitol Res. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/250868
Aradaib IE, Omer OH, Abbas BB, Bushara HO, Elmalik KH, Saad AM, Osburn BI, Taylor MG (1995) Schistosoma bovis whole egg antigen did not protect zebu calves against experimental schistosomosis. Prev Vet Med 21:339–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(94)00385-V
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the grants received from Kerala State Council for Science Technology and Environment and technical support of Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, Kerala, India for conducting the research.
Funding
The Grants for research received from Kerala State Council for Science Technology and Environment vide Council (P) order no.411/2021/KSCSTE dated 08.10.2021.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BL planned the research work and drafted the manuscript. JJ performed the PCR. Amrutha provided support for RFLP studies and drafting manuscript. PMN critically reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
None.
Ethical Approval
The work has been done as per the guidelines of institutional ethical committee. The article does not contain any experimental studies on animals and the protocols followed using flukes are ethical.
Consent to Participate
The flukes were collected from mesentery of cattle from organised abattoirs.
Consent for Publication
The authors guarantee that the work has not been previously published elsewhere and also agreed to the terms and conditions of publications in this journal.
Availability of Data and Material
All the data supporting the conclusions of this article are available within the article.
Code Availability
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lakshmanan, B., Jose, J., Anand, A. et al. A Novel PCR–RFLP to Detect and Differentiate Schistosoma spindale and S. indicum, the Pathogenic Schistosomes in Indian Cattle. Acta Parasit. 67, 1778–1781 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-022-00606-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-022-00606-5