Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: where are we heading?

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Frontiers of Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is coming to medicine in a big wave. From making diagnosis in various medical conditions, following the latest advancements in scientific literature, suggesting appropriate therapies, to predicting prognosis and outcome of diseases and conditions, AI is offering unprecedented possibilities to improve care for patients. Gastroenterology is a field that AI can make a significant impact. This is partly because the diagnosis of gastrointestinal conditions relies a lot on image-based investigations and procedures (endoscopy and radiology). AI-assisted image analysis can make accurate assessment and provide more information than conventional analysis. AI integration of genomic, epigenetic, and metagenomic data may offer new classifications of gastrointestinal cancers and suggest optimal personalized treatments. In managing relapsing and remitting diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and peptic ulcer bleeding, convoluted neural network may formulate models to predict disease outcome, enhancing treatment efficacy. AI and surgical robots can also assist surgeons in conducting gastrointestinal operations. While the advancement and new opportunities are exciting, the responsibility and liability issues of AI-assisted diagnosis and management need much deliberations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, Stumpe MC, Wu D, Narayanaswamy A, Venugopalan S, Widner K, Madams T, Cuadros J, Kim R, Raman R, Nelson PC, Mega JL, Webster DR. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA 2016; 316(22): 2402–2410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rodríguez-Ruiz A, Krupinski E, Mordang JJ, Schilling K, Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Sechopoulos I, Mann RM. Detection of breast cancer with mammography: effect of an artificial intelligence support system. Radiology 2019; 290(2): 305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, Ko J, Swetter SM, Blau HM, Thrun S. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 2017; 542(7639): 115–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mori Y, Kudo SE, Berzin TM, Misawa M, Takeda K. Computeraided diagnosis for colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2017; 49(8): 813–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ciccone MM, Aquilino A, Cortese F, Scicchitano P, Sassara M, Mola E, Rollo R, Caldarola P, Giorgino F, Pomo V, Bux F. Feasibility and effectiveness of a disease and care management model in the primary health care system for patients with heart failure and diabetes (Project Leonardo). Vasc Health Risk Manag 2010; 6: 297–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Byrne MF, Chapados N, Soudan F, Oertel C, Linares Pérez M, Kelly R, Iqbal N, Chandelier F, Rex DK. Real-time differentiation of adenomatous and hyperplastic diminutive colorectal polyps during analysis of unaltered videos of standard colonoscopy using a deep learning model. Gut 2019; 68(1): 94–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Urban G, Tripathi P, Alkayali T, Mittal M, Jalali F, Karnes W, Baldi P. Deep learning localizes and identifies polyps in real time with 96% accuracy in screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2018; 155(4): 1069–1078.e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang P, Xiao X, Glissen Brown JR, Bharadwaj S, Becq A, Xiao X, Liu PX, Li LP, Song Y, Zhang D, Li Y, Xu GR, Tu MT, Liu XG. Real-time automatic detection system increases colonoscopic polyp and adenoma detection rates: a prospective randomized controlled study. Gut 2019; 68: 1813–1819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Misawa M, Kudo SE, Mori Y, Cho T, Kataoka S, Yamauchi A, Ogawa Y, Maeda Y, Takeda K, Ichimasa K, Nakamura H, Yagawa Y, Toyoshima N, Ogata N, Kudo T, Hisayuki T, Hayashi T, Wakamura K, Baba T, Ishida F, Itoh H, Roth H, Oda M, Mori K. Artificial intelligence-assisted polyp detection for colonoscopy: initial experience. Gastroenterology 2018; 154(8): 2027–2029.e3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mori Y, Kudo SE, Misawa M, Saito Y, Ikematsu H, Hotta K, Ohtsuka K, Urushibara F, Kataoka S, Ogawa Y, Maeda Y, Takeda K, Nakamura H, Ichimasa K, Kudo T, Hayashi T, Wakamura K, Ishida F, Inoue H, Itoh H, Oda M, Mori K. Real-time use of artificial intelligence in identification of diminutive polyps during colonoscopy: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169(6): 357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. AI-based medical diagnostic services to be launched in Japan. Kyodo news Tokyo/Feb 5 2019

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ikenoyama Y, Hirasawa T, Ishioka M, et al. Comparing artificial intelligence using deep learning throught convolutional neural networks and endoscopist’s diagnostic ability for detecting early gastric cancer. DDW abstract 2019; 379

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ishioka M, Hirasawa T, Tada T. Detecting gastric cancer from video images using convolutional neural networks. Dig Endosc 2019; 31(2): e34–e35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Iwagami H, Ishihara R, Fukuda H, et al. Artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of Siewert type I and II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas. DDW 2019; Tu 1954

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tokai Y, Yoskio T, Fujisaki J, et al. Application of artificial intelligence using convolutional neural networks in diagnosing the invasion depth of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. DDW 2019; 1209

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ichimasa K, Kudo S, Mori Y, et al. Artificial intelligence with help in determining the need for additional surgery after endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer—analysis based on a big data for machine learning. DDW 2019; 475

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aoki T, Yamada A, Aoyama K, Saito H, Tsuboi A, Nakada A, Niikura R, Fujishiro M, Oka S, Ishihara S, Matsuda T, Tanaka S, Koike K, Tada T. Automatic detection of erosions and ulcerations in wireless capsule endoscopy images based on a deep convolutional neural network. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89(2): 357–363.e2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leenhardt R, Vasseur P, Li C, Saurin JC, Rahmi G, Cholet F, Becq A, Marteau P, Histace A, Dray X; CAD-CAP Database Working Group. A neural network algorithm for detection of GI angiectasia during small-bowel capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89(1): 189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kakadiaris IA, Vrigkas M, Yen AA, Kuznetsova T, Budoff M, Naghavi M. Machine learning outperforms ACC/AHA CVD risk calculator in MESA. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7(22): e009476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kwon JM, Kim KH, Jeon KH, Park J. Deep learning for predicting in-hospital mortality among heart disease patients based on echocardiography. Echocardiography 2019; 36(2): 213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bandaria J, Boussios C, Donadio G, et al. Findings from a nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NAS) cohort developed via artificial intelligence in a large representative population in the US. DDW 2019; Sa 1631

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shung D, Au B, Taylor R, et al. Development and validation of machine learning models to predict outcomes in UGIB with comparison to clinical risk score. DDW 2019; 325

    Google Scholar 

  23. Poon NC, Sung JJ. Self-driving cars and AI-assisted endoscopy: who should take the responsibility when things go wrong? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 34(4): 625–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang GZ, Cambias J, Cleary K, Daimler E, Drake J, Dupont PE, Hata N, Kazanzides P, Martel S, Patel RV, Santos VJ, Taylor RH. Medical robotics—regulatory, ethical, and legal considerations for increasing levels of autonomy. Sci Robot 2017; 2(4): eaam8638

    Google Scholar 

  25. Price WN II. Artificial intelligence in health care: applications and legal implications. SciTech Lawyer 2017; 14(1): 10–13

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lupton M. Some ethical and legal consequences of the application of artificial intelligence in the field of medicine. Trends Med 2018; 18(4): 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Digestive Disease, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Joseph JY Sung

  2. Big Data Decision Analytic Cancer, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Nicholas CH Poon

Authors
  1. Joseph JY Sung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicholas CH Poon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph JY Sung.

Ethics declarations

Joseph JY Sung and Nicholas CH Poon declare that they have no conflict of interest. This manuscript is a commentary article and does not involve a research protocol requiring approval of a relevant institutional review board or ethics committee. The article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sung, J.J., Poon, N.C. Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: where are we heading?. Front. Med. 14, 511–517 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-020-0742-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-020-0742-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation