Abstract
The internet is a major source for health information. An increasing number of people, including patients with insomnia, search for remedies online; however, little is known about the quality of such information. This study aimed to evaluate the quality and readability of insomnia-related online information. Google was used as the search engine, and the top websites on insomnia that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated for quality and readability. The analyzed websites belonged to nonprofit, commercial, or academic organizations and institutions such as hospitals and universities. Insomnia-related websites typically included definitions (85%), causes and risk factors (100%), symptoms (95%), and treatment options (90%). Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) was the most commonly recommended approach for insomnia treatment, and sleep drugs are frequently mentioned. The overall quality of the websites on insomnia is moderate, but all the content exceeded the recommended reading ease levels. Concerns that must be addressed to increase the quality and trustworthiness of online health information include sharing metadata, such as authorship, time of creation and last update, and conflicts of interest; providing evidence for reliability; and increasing the readability for a layman audience.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Statistics Canada. Canadian Internet Use Survey-2009. 2010. Available from:http://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/
Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Pleis J. Using the internet for healthrelated activities: findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res 2009; 11(1): e4
Ybarra ML, Suman M. Help seeking behavior and the Internet: a national survey. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75(1): 29–41
Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire GP, Baum M. Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. BMJ 1990; 301(6752): 575–580
Gilmour JA, Huntington A, Broadbent R, Strong A, Hawkins M. Nurses’ use of online health information in medical wards. J Adv Nurs 2012; 68(6): 1349–1358
Kumar VS, Subramani S, Veerapan S, Khan SA. Evaluation of online health information on clubfoot using the DISCERN tool. J Pediatr Orthop B 2014; 23(2): 135–138
Ma Y, Dong M, Mita C, Sun S, Peng CK, Yang AC. Publication analysis on insomnia: how much has been done in the past two decades? Sleep Med 2015; 16(7): 820–826
Pletneva N, Vargas A, Kalogianni K, Boyer C. Online health information search: what struggles and empowers the users? Results of an online survey. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 180: 843–847
NETMARKETSHARE. Desktop Search Engine Market Share. Available from: https://www.netmarketshare.com/search-enginemarket-share.aspx?qprid = 4&qpcustomd = 0 (Accessed April 13, 2017)
Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA 2002; 287(20): 2691–2700
Feufel MA, Stahl SF. What do web-use skill differences imply for online health information searches? J Med Internet Res 2012; 14(3): e87
Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53(2): 105–111
Ademiluyi G, Rees CE, Sheard CE. Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the Internet. Patient Educ Couns 2003; 50(2): 151–155
Wilson P. How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet. BMJ 2002; 324(7337): 598–602
Aldairy T, Laverick S, McIntyre GT. Orthognathic surgery: is patient information on the Internet valid? Eur J Orthod 2012; 34(4): 466–469
Batchelor JM, Ohya Y. Use of the DISCERN instrument by patients and health professionals to assess information resources on treatments for asthma and atopic dermatitis. Allergol Int 2009; 58(1): 141–145
Fast AM, Deibert CM, Hruby GW, Glassberg KI. Evaluating the quality of Internet health resources in pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol 2013; 9(2): 151–156
Kaicker J, Debono VB, Dang W, Buckley N, Thabane L. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument. BMC Med 2010; 8(1): 59
Pusz MD, Brietzke SE. How good is Google? The quality of otolaryngology information on the internet. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 147(3): 462–465
Zahedi R, Taheri B, Shahrzadi L, Tazhibi M, Ashrafi-rizi H. Quality of Persian addiction websites: a survey based on silberg, discern and wqet instruments (2011). Acta Inform Med 2013; 21(1): 46–50
Cerminara C, Santarone ME, Casarelli L, Curatolo P, El Malhany N. Use of the DISCERN tool for evaluating web searches in childhood epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2014; 41: 119–121
Daraz L, Macdermid JC, Wilkins S, Gibson J, Shaw L. The quality of websites addressing fibromyalgia: an assessment of quality and readability using standardised tools. BMJ Open 2011; 1(1): e000152
Tallgren M, Bäcklund M. Patient information about general anaesthesia on the internet. Anaesthesia 2009; 64(4): 408–415
Daraz L, MacDermid JC, Wilkins S, Shaw L. Tools to evaluate the quality of web health information: a structured review of content and usability. Int J Technol Knowl Soc 2009; 5: 3
Walsh TM, Volsko TA. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information. Respir Care 2008; 53(10): 1310–1315
US National Library of Medicine. How to Write Easy-to-Read Health Materials 2013. Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/ medlineplus/etr.html. Page last updated on December 29, 2016
Weiss BD. Health Literacy: A Manual for Clinicians. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, American Medical Foundation. 2003
Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP Jr, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. DTIC Document, 1975
Davis TC, Mayeaux EJ, Fredrickson D, Bocchini JA Jr, Jackson RH, Murphy PW. Reading ability of parents compared with reading level of pediatric patient education materials. Pediatrics 1994; 93(3): 460–468
McLaughlin GH. SMOG grading: a new readability formula. J Read 1969; 12(8): 639–646
Fitzsimmons PR, Michael BD, Hulley JL, Scott GO. A readability assessment of online Parkinson’s disease information. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2010; 40(4): 292–296
Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Croyle RT, Arora NK, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165(22): 2618–2624
Hu X, Bell RA, Kravitz RL, Orrange S. The prepared patient: information seeking of online support group members before their medical appointments. J Health Commun 2012; 17(8): 960–978
Lv X, Ma Y, Feng F, Hong L, Wang J, Wang W. Personality development since childhood associated with adult chronic insomnia: a study by Wang’s Memory-Tracing Personality Development Inventory (WMPI). Glob J Health Sci 2016; 9(3): 80
Ma Y, Yeung A, Yang AC, Peng CK, Clain A, Alpert J, Fava M, Yeung AS. The effects of tai chi on sleep quality in Chinese American patients with major depressive disorder: a pilot study. Behav Sleep Med 2016 Sep 27. [Epub ahead of print] doi: 10.1080/15402002.2016.1228643
Sun S, Hong L, Ma Y, Zhao Y, Qiao J. WO-109 A Chinese questionnaire-based survey: sleep medicine awareness in primary care. Sleep Med 2011; 12: S122
Ma Y, Sun S, Peng CK. Applications of dynamical complexity theory in traditional Chinese medicine. Front Med 2014; 8(3): 279–284
Ma Y, Zhou K, Fan J, Sun S. Traditional Chinese medicine: potential approaches from modern dynamical complexity theories. Front Med 2016; 10(1): 28–32
Ma Y, McCraty R. Heart rate variability in mind-body interventions. Complement Ther Med 2016; 29: A1–A2
Shi W, Shang P, Ma Y, Sun S, Yeh CH. A comparison study on stages of sleep: quantifying multiscale complexity using higher moments on coarse-graining. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2017; 44: 292–303
Ma Y, Sun S, Peng CK, Fang Y, Thomas RJ. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in Chinese obstructive sleep apnea patients. J Clin Sleep Med 2017;13(3):433–439
Lu Y, Sun Y, Ma Y, Li H, Chang Y, Tong Y, Sun S. Investigation on the awareness of sleep medicine in a university of traditional Chinese medicine. Sleep Med 2015; 16(S1): S61
Ma Y, Sun S. Knowledge update on complex sleep apnea. Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis (Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi) 2013; 36(9): 687–691 (in Chinese)
Tseng PH, Lee PL, Hsu WC, Ma Y, Lee YC, Chiu HM, Ho YL, Chen MF, Wu MS, Peng CK. A higher proportion of metabolic syndrome in Chinese subjects with sleep-disordered breathing: a case-control study based on electrocardiogram-derived sleep analysis. PLoS One 2017; 12(1): e0169394
Hong L, Ma Y, Lin Y, Wang F, Tong C, Zhao X, Wang W. Correlation study of depression, anxiety and sleep disturbance. Int J Tradit Chin Med (Guo Ji Zhong Yi Zhong Yao Za Zhi) 2009; 31(2): 152–154 (in Chinese)
Hong L, Wei H, Ma Y, Wang W. Manifestation study on depression in comprehensive hospitals. Int J Tradit Chin Med (Guo Ji Zhong Yi Zhong Yao Za Zhi) 2010; 32(3): 259–261 (in Chinese)
Ma Y. Review on sleep belief and attitude. World J Sleep Med (Shi Jie Shui Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi) 2015; 2(6): 356–361 (in Chinese)
Ma Y, Dong M, Zhou K, Mita C, Liu J, Wayne PM. Publication trends in acupuncture research: a 20-year bibliometric analysis based on PubMed. PLoS One 2016; 11(12): e0168123
Zhou K, Ma Y, Brogan MS. Dry needling versus acupuncture: the ongoing debate. Acupunct Med 2015; 33(6): 485–490
Xu H, Ma Y, Wang W. Patients’ independent choices to resistance. Med Philos (Humanist Soc Med Ed) (Yi Xue Yu Zhe Xue: Ren Wen She Hui Yi Xue Ban). 2010; 31(2): 44–46 (in Chinese)
Ma Y, Sun SC. Sleep medicine and blood pressure variation: significance to clinical application of anti-hypertensive medicines. World J Sleep Med (Shi Jie Shui Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi) 2014; (4): 235–238 (in Chinese)
McPherson AC, Gofine ML, Stinson J. Seeing is believing? A mixed-methods study exploring the quality and perceived trustworthiness of online information about chronic conditions aimed at children and young people. Health Commun 2014; 29(5): 473–482
Tan BH, Kostapanagiotou K, Jilaihawi AN. A review of mesothelioma information on the World Wide Web. J Thorac Oncol 2009; 4(1): 102–104
Kaicker J, Dang W, Mondal T. Assessing the quality and reliability of health information on ERCP using the DISCERN instrument. Health Care Curr Rev 2013;1: 104. doi:10.4172/hccr.1000104
Ye Y. Correlates of consumer trust in online health information: findings from the health information national trends survey. J Health Commun 2011; 16(1): 34–49
Hargrave DR, Hargrave UA, Bouffet E. Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology. Neurooncol 2006; 8(2): 175–182
Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Muñoz JA, Puyol JA, Lara M, Watkins KE, Yang H, McGlynn EA. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA 2001; 285(20): 2612–2621
D’Alessandro DM, Kingsley P, Johnson-West J. The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155(7): 807–812
Graber MA, Roller CM, Kaeble B. Readability levels of patient education material on the World Wide Web. J Fam Pract 1999; 48(1): 58–61
Acknowledgments
Yan Ma acknowledges the Fellowship support from Delta Environmental & Educational Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, Y., Yang, A.C., Duan, Y. et al. Quality and readability of online information resources on insomnia. Front. Med. 11, 423–431 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-017-0524-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-017-0524-9