Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of liver volume variation to evaluate liver function

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to assess the value of liver volumetry in cirrhosis and acute liver failure (ALF) patients, we explored the correlation between hepatic volume and severity of the hepatic diseases. The clinical data of 48 cirrhosis patients with 60 normal controls and 39 ALF patients were collected. Computed tomography-derived liver volume (CTLV) and body surface area (BSA) of normal controls were calculated to get a regression formula for standard liver volume (SLV) and BSA. Then CTLV and SLV of all patients were calculated and grouped by Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification for cirrhosis patients and assigned according to prognosis of ALF patients for further comparison. It turned out that the mean liver volume of the control group was 1 058 ± 337 cm3. SLV was correlated with BSA according to the regression formula. The hepatic volume of cirrhosis patients in Child A, B level was not reduced, but in Child C level it was significantly reduced with the lowest liver volume index (CTLV/SLV). Likewise, in the death group of ALF patients, the volume index was significantly lower than that of the survival group. Based on volumetric study, we proposed an ROC (receiver operating characteristic) analysis to predict the prognosis of ALF patients that CTLV/SLV < 83.9% indicates a poor prognosis. In conclusion, the CTLV/SLV ratio, which reflects liver volume variations, correlates well with the liver function and progression of cirrhosis and ALF. It is also a very useful marker for predicting the prognosis of ALF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saygili OB, Tarhan NC, Yildirim T, Serin E, Ozer B, Agildere AM. Value of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for assessing severity of liver cirrhosis secondary to viral hepatitis. Eur J Radiol 2005; 54(3): 400–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sekiyama K, Yoshiba M, Inoue K, Sugata F. Prognostic value of hepatic volumetry in fulminant hepatic failure. Dig Dis Sci 1994; 39(2): 240–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Doherty DA, Gertsch P, Fenstermacher MJ, Loyer EM, Lerut J, Materne R, Wang X, Encarnacion A, Herron D, Mathey C, Ferrari G, Charnsangavej C, Do KA, Denys A. Body surface area and body weight predict total liver volume in Western adults. Liver Transpl 2002; 8(3): 233–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chinese Medical Association. Viral Hepatitis Prevention and Treatment Scheme in China. Chin J Hepatol (Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi) 2000; 8(6): 324–329 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heymsfield SB, Fulenwider T, Nordlinger B, Barlow R, Sones P, Kutner M. Accurate measurement of liver, kidney, and spleen volume and mass by computerized axial tomography. Ann Intern Med 1979; 90(2): 185–187

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kardel T, Holm HH, Rasmussen SN, Mortensen T. Ultrasonic determination of liver and spleem volumes. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1971; 27(2): 123–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalkmann J, Forsting M, Stattaus J. Liver volume variations as a parameter to assess therapy response in advanced metastatic liver disease. Onkologie 2011; 34(1–2): 30–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubus L, Gayet M, Zappa M, Abaleo L, De Cooman A, Orieux G, Vilgrain V. Comparison of semi-automated and manual methods to measure the volume of liver tumours on MDCT images. Eur Radiol 2011; 21(5): 996–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Müller SA, Bläuer K, Kremer M, Thorn M, Mehrabi A, Meinzer HP, Hinz U, Metzger J, Büchler MW, Schmied BM. Exact CT-based liver volume calculation including nonmetabolic liver tissue in three-dimensional liver reconstruction. J Surg Res 2010; 160(2): 236–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou XP, Lu T, Wei YG, Chen XZ. Liver volume variation in patients with virus-induced cirrhosis: findings on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189(3): W153–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Du WB, Pan XP, Li LJ. Prognostic models for acute liver failure. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2010; 9(2): 122–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li YM, Lv F, Xu X, Ji H, Gao WT, Lei TJ, Ren GB, Bai ZL, Li Q. Evaluation of liver functional reserve by combining D-sorbitol clearance rate and CT measured liver volume.World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9(9): 2092–2095

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tu R, Xia LP, Yu AL, Wu L. Assessment of hepatic functional reserve by cirrhosis grading and liver volume measurement using CT. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(29): 3956–3961

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Joyeux H, Berticelli J, Chemouny S, Masson B, Borianne P. Semiautomatic measurements of hepatic lobes. Application to study of liver volumes. Analysis of 50 computed tomography of normal liver. Ann Chir 2003; 128(4): 251–255 (in French)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dodd GD 3rd, Baron RL, Oliver JH 3rd, Federle MP. Spectrum of imaging findings of the liver in end-stage cirrhosis: Part II, focal abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173(5): 1185–1192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang JH, Changchien CS, Hung CH, Eng HL, Tung WC, Kee KM, Chen CH, Hu TH, Lee CM, Lu SN. FibroScan and ultrasonography in the prediction of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. J Gastroenterol 2009; 44(5): 439–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shim JH, Yu JS, Chung JJ, Kim JH, Kim KW. Segmental difference of the hepatic fibrosis from chronic viral hepatitis due to hepatitis B versus C virus infection: comparison using dual contrast materialenhanced MRI. Korean J Radiol 2011; 12(4): 431–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Krinsky GA, Lee VS, Theise ND. Focal lesions in the cirrhotic liver: high resolution ex vivo MRI with pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24(2): 189–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shakil AO, Jones BC, Lee RG, Federle MP, Fung JJ, Rakela J. Prognostic value of abdominal CT scanning and hepatic histopathology in patients with acute liver failure. Dig Dis Sci 2000; 45(2): 334–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, 710061, China

    Cong Tong, Xinsen Xu, Chang Liu & Kai Qu

  2. Department of Surgery, Shaanxi Xianyang 215 Hospital, Xianyang, 712000, China

    Tianzheng Zhang

Authors
  1. Cong Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xinsen Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tianzheng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kai Qu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Liu.

Additional information

These authors contributed equally to this study and share first authorship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tong, C., Xu, X., Liu, C. et al. Assessment of liver volume variation to evaluate liver function. Front. Med. 6, 421–427 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-012-0223-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-012-0223-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation