Abstract
The study aimed to develop and validate a gamified cognitive flexibility task through brain imaging, and to investigate behavioral and brain activation differences between young and older adults during task performance. Thirty-one young adults (aged 18–35) and 31 older adults (aged 60–80) were included in the present study. All participants underwent fMRI scans while completing the gamified cognitive flexibility task. Results showed that young adults outperformed older adults on the task. The left inferior frontal junction (IFJ), a key region of cognitive flexibility, was significantly activated during the task in both older and young adults. Comparatively, the percent signal change in the left IFJ was stronger in older adults than in young adults. Moreover, older adults demonstrated more precise representations during the task in the left IFJ. Additionally, the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL) and superior parietal lobule in older adults and the left middle frontal gyrus (MFG) and inferior frontal gyrus in young adults were also activated during the task. Psychophysiological interaction analyses showed significant functional connectivity between the left IFJ and the left IPL, as well as the right precuneus in older adults. In young adults, significant functional connectivity was found between the left IFJ and the left MFG, as well as the right angular. The current study provides preliminary evidence for the validity of the gamified cognitive flexibility task through brain imaging. The findings suggest that this task could serve as a reliable tool for assessing cognitive flexibility and for exploring age-related differences of cognitive flexibility in both brain and behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data and analysis code for this study are not yet available but will be made available upon reasonable request at the completion of the study by emailing.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Abraham, A., Pedregosa, F., Eickenberg, M., Gervais, P., Mueller, A., Kossaifi, J., Gramfort, A., Thirion, B., & Varoquaux, G. (2014). Machine learning for neuroirnaging with scikit-learn. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 8, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2014.00014.
Armbruster-Genc, D. J. N., Ueltzhoefer, K., & Fiebach, C. J. (2016). Brain signal variability differentially affects cognitive flexibility and cognitive stability. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(14), 3978–3987. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2517-14.2016.
Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010.
Asunta, P., Viholainen, H., Ahonen, T., & Rintala, P. (2019). Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties: A systematic review. BMC Pediatrics, 19(1), 322. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1657-6.
Baez-Lugo, S., Deza-Araujo, Y. I., Maradan, C., Collette, F., Lutz, A., Marchant, N. L., Chételat, G., Vuilleumier, P., Klimecki, O., & Medit-Ageing Research Group. (2023). Exposure to negative socio-emotional events induces sustained alteration of resting-state brain networks in older adults. Nature Aging, 3(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-022-00341-6.
Bilder, R. M., & Reise, S. P. (2019). Neuropsychological tests of the future: How do we get there from here? Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(2), 220–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1521993.
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1061.
Cabral, J., Vidaurre, D., Marques, P., Magalhães, R., Silva Moreira, P., Miguel Soares, J., Deco, G., Sousa, N., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2017). Cognitive performance in healthy older adults relates to spontaneous switching between states of functional connectivity during rest. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 5135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05425-7.
Capouskova, K., Zamora-López, G., Kringelbach, M. L., & Deco, G. (2023). Integration and segregation manifolds in the brain ensure cognitive flexibility during tasks and rest. Human Brain Mapping, 44(18), 6349–6363. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26511.
Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008). The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58(3), 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017.
Cutler, J., Wittmann, M. K., Abdurahman, A., Hargitai, L. D., Drew, D., Husain, M., & Lockwood, P. L. (2021). Ageing is associated with disrupted reinforcement learning whilst learning to help others is preserved. Nature Communications, 12(1), 4440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24576-w.
Derrfuss, J., Brass, M., Neumann, J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: Meta-analyses of switching and stroop studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20127.
Derrfuss, J., Brass, M., von Cramon, D. Y., Lohmann, G., & Amunts, K. (2009). Neural activations at the junction of the inferior frontal sulcus and the inferior precentral sulcus: Interindividual variability, reliability, and association with sulcal morphology. Human Brain Mapping, 30(1), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20501.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.
Du, Y., & Zatorre, R. J. (2017). Musical training sharpens and bonds ears and tongue to hear speech better. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(51), 13579–13584. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712223114.
Eich, T. S., Parker, D., Liu, D., Oh, H., Razlighi, Q., Gazes, Y., Habeck, C., & Stern, Y. (2016). Functional brain and age-related changes associated with congruency in task switching. Neuropsychologia, 91, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.009.
Eich, T. S., Langfield, C., Sakhardande, J., Gazes, Y., Habeck, C., & Stern, Y. (2023). Older adults compensate for switch, but not mixing costs, relative to younger adults on an intrinsically cued task switching experiment. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 15, 1152582. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2023.1152582.
Evangelista, N. D., O’Shea, A., Kraft, J. N., Hausman, H. K., Boutzoukas, E. M., Nissim, N. R., Albizu, A., Hardcastle, C., Van Etten, E. J., Bharadwaj, P. K., Smith, S. G., Song, H., Hishaw, G. A., DeKosky, S., Wu, S., Porges, E., Alexander, G. E., Marsiske, M., Cohen, R., & Woods, A. J. (2021). Independent contributions of dorsolateral prefrontal structure and function to working memory in healthy older adults. Cerebral Cortex, 31(3), 1732–1743. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa322.
Friston, K. J., Buechel, C., Fink, G. R., Morris, J., Rolls, E., & Dolan, R. J. (1997). Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage, 6(3), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1997.0291.
Grady, C. (2012). The cognitive neuroscience of ageing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(7), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3256.
Gregory, M. A. (2020). Commentary: Increased prefrontal activity with aging reflects nonspecific neural responses rather than compensation. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 14., Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2020.00009.
He, L., Zhuang, K., Chen, Q., Wei, D., Chen, X., Fan, J., & Qiu, J. (2021). Unity and diversity of neural representation in executive functions. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 150(11), 2193–2207. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001047.
Heckner, M. K., Cieslik, E. C., Eickhoff, S. B., Camilleri, J. A., Hoffstaedter, F., & Langner, R. (2021). The aging brain and executive functions revisited: Implications from meta-analytic and functional-connectivity evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(9), 1716–1752. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01616
Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1166–1186. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0935-1.
Howieson, D. (2019). Current limitations of neuropsychological tests and assessment procedures. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(2), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1552762.
Jia, T., Ing, A., Quinlan, E. B., Tay, N., Luo, Q., Francesca, B., Banaschewski, T., Barker, G. J., Bokde, A. L. W., Bromberg, U., Büchel, C., Desrivières, S., Feng, J., Flor, H., Grigis, A., Garavan, H., Gowland, P., Heinz, A., Ittermann, B., Martinot, J. L., Martinot, M. P., Nees, F., Orfanos, D. P., Paus, T., Poustka, L., Fröhner, J. H., Smolka, M. N., Walter, H., Whelan, R., & Schumann, G. (2020a). Neurobehavioural characterisation and stratification of reinforcement-related behaviour. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 544–558. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0846-5.
Jia, X. Z., Sun, J. W., Ji, G. J., Liao, W., Lv, Y. T., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, H., Liu, D. Q., & Zang, Y. F. (2020b). Percent amplitude of fluctuation: A simple measure for resting-state fMRI signal at single voxel level. Plos One, 15(1), e0227021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227021.
Kessels, R. P. C. (2019). Improving precision in neuropsychological assessment: Bridging the gap between classic paper-and-pencil tests and paradigms from cognitive neuroscience. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(2), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1518489.
Kim, W., & Kim, M. J. (2022). Morphological similarity of amygdala-ventral prefrontal pathways represents trait anxiety in younger and older adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(42), e2205162119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2205162119.
Kim, C., Cilles, S. E., Johnson, N. F., & Gold, B. T. (2012). Domain general and domain preferential brain regions associated with different types of task switching: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 33(1), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21199.
Koen, J. D., & Rugg, M. D. (2019). Neural dedifferentiation in the aging brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(7), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.012.
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013.
Kunimi, M., Kiyama, S., & Nakai, T. (2016). Investigation of age-related changes in brain activity during the divalent task-switching paradigm using functional MRI. Neuroscience Research, 103, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2015.06.011.
Kuptsova, S. V., Ivanova, M. V., Petrushevskiy, A. G., Fedina, O. N., & Zhavoronkova, L. A. (2016). Sex- and age-related characteristics of brain functioning during task switching (fMRI study). Human Physiology, 42(4), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119716040101.
Lövdén, M., Bäckman, L., Lindenberger, U., Schaefer, S., & Schmiedek, F. (2010). A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020080.
Lyons, I. M., Price, G. R., Vaessen, A., Blomert, L., & Ansari, D. (2014). Numerical predictors of arithmetic success in grades 1–6. Developmental Science, 17(5), 714–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12152.
Marcopulos, B., & Lojek, E. (2019). Introduction to the special issue: Are modern neuropsychological assessment methods really modern? Reflections on the current neuropsychological test armamentarium. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1560502.
Meinzer, M., Seeds, L., Flaisch, T., Harnish, S., Cohen, M. L., McGregor, K., Conway, T., Benjamin, M., & Crosson, B. (2012). Impact of changed positive and negative task-related brain activity on word-retrieval in aging. Neurobiology of Aging, 33(4), 656–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.06.020.
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458.
Morcom, A. M., & Henson, R. N. A. (2018). Increased prefrontal activity with aging reflects nonspecific neural responses rather than compensation. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(33), 7303–7313. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1701-17.2018.
Nashiro, K., Qin, S., O’Connell, M. A., & Basak, C. (2018). Age-related differences in BOLD modulation to cognitive control costs in a multitasking paradigm: Global switch, local switch, and compatibility-switch costs. Neuroimage, 172, 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.030.
Nyberg, L., Lovden, M., Riklund, K., Lindenberger, U., & Backman, L. (2012). Memory aging and brain maintenance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(5), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.005.
Park, D. C., & Festini, S. B. (2016). The middle-aged brain: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. In R. Cabeza, L. Nyberg, & D. C. Park (Eds.), Cognitive Neuroscience of Aging: Linking Cognitive and Cerebral Aging (2nd ed., pp. 363–388). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199372935.003.0015.
Park, D. C., & Festini, S. B. (2017). Theories of memory and aging: A look at the past and a glimpse of the future. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw066.
Park, D. C., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2009). The adaptive brain: Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656.
Pawlowski, J., Segabinazi, J. D., Wagner, F., & Bandeira, D. R. (2013). A systematic review of validity procedures used in neuropsychological batteries. Psychology & Neuroscience, 6(3), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2013.3.09.
Ptak, R. (2012). The frontoparietal attention network of the human brain: Action, saliency, and a priority map of the environment. The Neuroscientist, 18(5), 502–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858411409051.
Puiu, A. A., Wudarczyk, O., Kohls, G., Bzdok, D., Herpertz-Dahlmann, B., & Konrad, K. (2020). Meta-analytic evidence for a joint neural mechanism underlying response inhibition and state anger. Human Brain Mapping, 41(11), 3147–3160. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25004.
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Cappell, K. A. (2008). Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(3), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00570.x.
Suda, A., Osada, T., Ogawa, A., Tanaka, M., Kamagata, K., Aoki, S., Hattori, N., & Konishi, S. (2020). Functional organization for response inhibition in the right inferior frontal cortex of individual human brains. Cerebral Cortex, 30(12), 6325–6335. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa188.
Tagliabue, C. F., & Mazza, V. (2021). What can neural activity tell us about cognitive resources in aging? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 753423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753423.
Toepper, M., Gebhardt, H., Beblo, T., Thomas, C., Driessen, M., Bischoff, M., Blecker, C. R., Vaitl, D., & Sammer, G. (2010). Functional correlates of distractor suppression during spatial working memory encoding. Neuroscience, 165(4), 1244–1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.11.019.
Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., & Joliot, M. (2002). Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage, 15(1), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0978.
Valente, G., Castellanos, A. L., Hausfeld, L., De Martino, F., & Formisano, E. (2021). Cross-validation and permutations in MVPA: Validity of permutation strategies and power of cross-validation schemes. Neuroimage, 238, 118145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118145.
Wang, P., Fang, Y., Qi, J. Y., & Li, H. J. (2023). FISHERMAN: A serious game for executive function assessment of older adults. Assessment, 30(5), 1499–1513. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221105648
Webb, S. S., & Demeyere, N. (2022). Using multiverse analysis to highlight differences in convergent correlation outcomes due to data analytical and study design choices. Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221127904.
Worringer, B., Langner, R., Koch, I., Eickhoff, S. B., Eickhoff, C. R., & Binkofski, F. C. (2019). Common and distinct neural correlates of dual-tasking and task-switching: A meta-analytic review and a neuro-cognitive processing model of human multitasking. Brain Structure & Function, 224(5), 1845–1869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01870-4.
Xue, G., Aron, A. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2008). Common neural substrates for inhibition of spoken and manual responses. Cerebral Cortex, 18(8), 1923–1932. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm220.
Yang, G. R., Cole, M. W., & Rajan, K. (2019a). How to study the neural mechanisms of multiple tasks. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 29, 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.07.001.
Yang, G. R., Joglekar, M. R., Song, H. F., Newsome, W. T., & Wang, X. J. (2019b). Task representations in neural networks trained to perform many cognitive tasks. Nature Neuroscience, 22(2), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0310-2.
Yin, S., Deak, G., & Chen, A. (2018). Coactivation of cognitive control networks during task switching. Neuropsychology, 32(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000406.
Yuan, J., Wang, Q., Shang, S., Lei, Y., & Lou, L. (2023). Analysis of brain signal change response in amygdala evoked by skin pressure stimulus. Skin Research Technology, 29(1), e13238. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13238.
Zhang, G., Yao, L., Zhang, H., Long, Z., & Zhao, X. (2013). Improved working memory performance through self-regulation of dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex activation using real-time fMRI. Plos One, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073735. Article e73735.
Zhang, L., Wang, X., Alain, C., & Du, Y. (2023). Successful aging of musicians: Preservation of sensorimotor regions aids audiovisual speech-in-noise perception. Science Advances, 9(17), eadg7056. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg7056.
Zuhlsdorff, K., Dalley, J. W., Robbins, T. W., & Morein-Zamir, S. (2022). Cognitive flexibility: Neurobehavioral correlates of changing one’s mind. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac431.
Acknowledgements
We thank all the participants who participated in this study.
Funding
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31871143), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023M740297), and Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF (GZB20230074). The funders played no role in the design, conduct, or reporting of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ping Wang collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. Sheng-Ju Guo analyzed the data. Hui-Jie Li conceived the idea and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Consent to participate
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to the study.
Conflict of interest
No competing financial interests exist.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, P., Guo, SJ. & Li, HJ. Brain imaging of a gamified cognitive flexibility task in young and older adults. Brain Imaging and Behavior (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-024-00883-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-024-00883-w