Label-aligned multi-task feature learning for multimodal classification of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment
- 942 Downloads
Multimodal classification methods using different modalities of imaging and non-imaging data have recently shown great advantages over traditional single-modality-based ones for diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), as well as its prodromal stage, i.e., mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, to the best of our knowledge, most existing methods focus on mining the relationship across multiple modalities of the same subjects, while ignoring the potentially useful relationship across different subjects. Accordingly, in this paper, we propose a novel learning method for multimodal classification of AD/MCI, by fully exploring the relationships across both modalities and subjects. Specifically, our proposed method includes two subsequent components, i.e., label-aligned multi-task feature selection and multimodal classification. In the first step, the feature selection learning from multiple modalities are treated as different learning tasks and a group sparsity regularizer is imposed to jointly select a subset of relevant features. Furthermore, to utilize the discriminative information among labeled subjects, a new label-aligned regularization term is added into the objective function of standard multi-task feature selection, where label-alignment means that all multi-modality subjects with the same class labels should be closer in the new feature-reduced space. In the second step, a multi-kernel support vector machine (SVM) is adopted to fuse the selected features from multi-modality data for final classification. To validate our method, we perform experiments on the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database using baseline MRI and FDG-PET imaging data. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method achieves better classification performance compared with several state-of-the-art methods for multimodal classification of AD/MCI.
KeywordsAlzheimer’s disease Mild cognitive impairment Label alignment Multi-task learning Feature selection Multimodal classification
This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61422204, 61473149, 61170151), the Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholar (No. BK20130034), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (No. 20123218110009), and the NUAA Fundamental Research Funds (No. NE2013105), and by NIH grants EB006733, EB008374, EB009634, MH100217, AG041721, and AG042599.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Chang, C. C., & Lin, C. J. (2007). LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2(3), 389–396.Google Scholar
- Chen, X., Pan, W., Kwok, J. T., & Carbonell, J. G. (2009). Accelerated gradient method for multi-task sparse learning problem. Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Mining, 746–751.Google Scholar
- Derflinger, S., Sorg, C., Gaser, C., Myers, N., Arsic, M., Kurz, A., et al. (2011). Grey-matter atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease is asymmetric but not lateralized. Journal of Alzheimers Disease, 25(2), 347–357.Google Scholar
- Evgeniou, T., & Pontil, M. (2004). Regularized multi—task learning. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, (pp. 109–117).Google Scholar
- Fjell, A. M., Walhovd, K. N. C., Mcevoy, L. K., Hagler, D. J., Holland, D., Brewer, J. B., et al. (2010). CSF biomarkers in prediction of cerebral and clinical change in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 30(6), 2088–2101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gerardin, E., Chételat, G. l., Chupin, M., Cuingnet, R., Desgranges, B., Kim, H. S., et al. (2009). Multidimensional classification of hippocampal shape features discriminates Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment from normal aging. NeuroImage, 47(4), 1476–1486.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Higdon, R., Foster, N. L., Koeppe, R. A., DeCarli, C. S., Jagust, W. J., Clark, C. M., et al. (2004). A comparison of classification methods for differentiating fronto-temporal dementia from Alzheimer’s disease using FDG-PET imaging. Statistics in Medicine, 23(2), 315–326. doi: 10.1002/sim.1719.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang, S., Li, J., Ye, J., Wu, T., Chen, K., & Fleisher, A., et al. (2011). Identifying Alzheimer s disease-related brain regions from multi-modality neuroimaging data using sparse composite linear discrimination analysis. In J. Shawe-Taylor, R. S. Zemel, P. L. Bartlett, F. Pereira, & K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 24. Curran Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Kumar, A., & Daume Iii, H. (2012). Learning task grouping and overlap in multi-task learning. Computer Science - Learning.Google Scholar
- Liu, J., & Ye, J. (2010). Efficient L1/Lq norm regularization. Cambridge University Pub.Google Scholar
- Mcevoy, L. K., Fennema-Notestine, C., Roddey, J. C., Hagler, D. J., Jr., Holland, D., Karow, D. S., et al. (2009). Alzheimer disease: quantitative structural neuroimaging for detection and prediction of clinical and structural changes in mild cognitive impairment1. Radiology, 251(1), 195–205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- MJ, W., Kawas, C. H., Stewart, W. F., Rudow, G. L., & Troncoso, J. C. (2004). Hippocampal neurons in pre-clinical Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 25(25), 1205–1212.Google Scholar
- Nesterov, Y. (2003). Introductory lectures on convex optimization: a basic course. Computer Programming(Oct), 49–50.Google Scholar
- Obozinski, G., Jordan, M., & Taskar, B. (2006). Multi-task feature selection. The Workshop of Structural Knowledge Transfer for Machine Learning in International Conference on Machine Learning, 7(2), 1693–1696.Google Scholar
- Oliveira, P. P. D., Nitrini, R., Busatto, G., Buchpiguel, C., Sato, J. R., & Amaro, E. (2010). Use of SVM methods with surface-based cortical and volumetric subcortical measurements to detect Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Alzheimers Disease, 19(4), 1263–1272. doi: 10.3233/jad-2010-1322.Google Scholar
- Poulina, S., Dautoffb, R., Morris, J., Barrett, L., & Dickersona, B. (2011). Amygdala atrophy is prominent in early Alzheimer’s disease and relates to symptom severity. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 194(1), 7–13.Google Scholar
- Shattuck, D. W., Sandor-Leahy, S. R., Schaper, K. A., Rottenberg, D. A., & Leahy, R. M. (2001). Magnetic resonance image tissue classification using a partial volume model. In Neuroimage, pp. 856–876.Google Scholar
- Shen, D., & Davatzikos, C. (2002). HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration. In IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging pp. 1421–1439.Google Scholar
- Sole, A. D., Clerici, F., Chiti, A., Lecchi, M., Mariani, C., Maggiore, L., et al. (2008). Individual cerebral metabolic deficits in Alzheimer’s disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment: an FDG PET study. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 35(7), 1357–1366.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tibshirani, R. (1994). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 58(1), 267–288.Google Scholar
- Yuan, M., & Lin, Y. (2006). Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 68(1), 49–67. As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under “Related research” (further below) orfor a different version of it.CrossRefGoogle Scholar