Advertisement

Brain Imaging and Behavior

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 913–926 | Cite as

Multimodal manifold-regularized transfer learning for MCI conversion prediction

  • Bo Cheng
  • Mingxia Liu
  • Heung-Il Suk
  • Dinggang ShenEmail author
  • Daoqiang ZhangEmail author
  • Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Original Research

Abstract

As the early stage of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has high chance to convert to AD. Effective prediction of such conversion from MCI to AD is of great importance for early diagnosis of AD and also for evaluating AD risk pre-symptomatically. Unlike most previous methods that used only the samples from a target domain to train a classifier, in this paper, we propose a novel multimodal manifold-regularized transfer learning (M2TL) method that jointly utilizes samples from another domain (e.g., AD vs. normal controls (NC)) as well as unlabeled samples to boost the performance of the MCI conversion prediction. Specifically, the proposed M2TL method includes two key components. The first one is a kernel-based maximum mean discrepancy criterion, which helps eliminate the potential negative effect induced by the distributional difference between the auxiliary domain (i.e., AD and NC) and the target domain (i.e., MCI converters (MCI-C) and MCI non-converters (MCI-NC)). The second one is a semi-supervised multimodal manifold-regularized least squares classification method, where the target-domain samples, the auxiliary-domain samples, and the unlabeled samples can be jointly used for training our classifier. Furthermore, with the integration of a group sparsity constraint into our objective function, the proposed M2TL has a capability of selecting the informative samples to build a robust classifier. Experimental results on the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database validate the effectiveness of the proposed method by significantly improving the classification accuracy of 80.1 % for MCI conversion prediction, and also outperforming the state-of-the-art methods.

Keywords

Mild cognitive impairment conversion Manifold regularization Transfer learning Semi-supervised learning Multimodal classification Sample selection 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Data collection and sharing for this project was funded by the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904). ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and through generous contributions from the following: Abbott, AstraZeneca AB, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai Global Clinical Development, Elan Corporation, Genentech, GE Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, Innogenetics, Johnson and Johnson, Eli Lilly and Co., Medpace, Inc., Merck and Co., Inc., Novartis AG, Pfizer Inc, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Schering-Plough, Synarc, Inc., as well as non-profit partners the Alzheimer’s Association and Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation, with participation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Private sector contributions to ADNI are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (www.fnih.org). The grantee organization is the Northern California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study at the University of California, San Diego. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuron Imaging at the University of California, Los Angeles. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61422204, 61473149, 61473190, 1401271, 81471733), the Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholar (No. BK20130034), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (No. 20123218110009), the NUAA Fundamental Research Funds (No. NE2013105), and also by the NIH grant (EB006733, EB008374, EB009634, MH100217, AG041721, AG042599).

Conflict of Interest

Matthew Bo Cheng, Mingxia Liu, Heung-Il Suk, Dinggang Shen, and Daoqiang Zhang declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, and the applicable revisions at the time of the investigation. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

References

  1. Belkin, M., Niyogi, P., & Sindhwani, V. (2006). Manifold regularization: a geometric framework for learning from labeled and unlabeled examples. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 2399–2434.Google Scholar
  2. Borgwardt, K. M., Gretton, A., Rasch, M. J., Kriegel, H. P., Scholkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2006). Integrating structured biological data by kernel maximum mean discrepancy. Bioinformatics, 22, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouwman, F. H., Schoonenboom, S. N. M., van der Flier, W. M., van Elk, E. J., Kok, A., Barkhof, F., Blankenstein, M. A., & Scheltens, P. (2007). CSF biomarkers and medial temporal lobe atrophy predict dementia in mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiology of Aging, 28, 1070–1074.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang, C. C., Lin, C. J. (2001). LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines.Google Scholar
  5. Chao, L. L., Buckley, S. T., Kornak, J., Schuff, N., Madison, C., Yaffe, K., Miller, B. L., Kramer, J. H., & Weiner, M. W. (2010). ASL perfusion MRI predicts cognitive decline and conversion from MCI to dementia. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 24, 19–27.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, X., Pan, W., Kwok, J. T., Carbonell, J. G. (2009). Accelerated gradient method for multi-task sparse learning problem. Proceeding of Ninth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 746–751.Google Scholar
  7. Cheng, B., Zhang, D., & Shen, D. (2012). Domain transfer learning for MCI conversion prediction. Proceeding of International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI, 7510, 82–90.Google Scholar
  8. Cheng, B., Zhang, D., Chen, S., Kaufer, D. I., & Shen, D. (2013a). Semi-supervised multimodal relevance vector regression improves cognitive performance estimation from imaging and biological biomarkers. Neuroinformatics, 11, 339–353.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng, B., Zhang, D., Jie, B., & Shen, D. (2013b). Sparse multimodal manifold-regularized transfer learning for MCI conversion prediction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8184, 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chetelat, G., Eustache, F., Viader, F., De la Sayette, V., Pelerin, A., Mezenge, F., Hannequin, D., Dupuy, B., Baron, J. C., & Desgranges, B. (2005a). FDG-PET measurement is more accurate than neuropsychological assessments to predict global cognitive deterioration in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Neurocase, 11, 14–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chetelat, G., Landeau, B., Eustache, F., Mezenge, F., Viader, F., de la Sayette, V., Desgranges, B., & Baron, J. C. (2005b). Using voxel-based morphometry to map the structural changes associated with rapid conversion in MCI: a longitudinal MRI study. NeuroImage, 27, 934–946.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cho, Y., Seong, J. K., Jeong, Y., Shin, S. Y., & A.D.N.I. (2012). Individual subject classification for Alzheimer’s disease based on incremental learning using a spatial frequency representation of cortical thickness data. NeuroImage, 59, 2217–2230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. CIT (2012). Medical Image Processing, Analysis and Visualization (MIPAV) http://mipav.cit.nih.gov/clickwrap.php.Google Scholar
  14. Coupé, P., Eskildsen, S. F., Manjón, J. V., Fonov, V. S., Pruessner, J. C., Allard, M., & Collins, D. L. (2012). Scoring by nonlocal image patch estimator for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage: Clinical, 1, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cuingnet, R., Gerardin, E., Tessieras, J., Auzias, G., Lehericy, S., Habert, M. O., Chupin, M., Benali, H., & Colliot, O. (2011). Automatic classification of patients with Alzheimer’s disease from structural MRI: a comparison of ten methods using the ADNI database. NeuroImage, 56, 766–781.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Da, X., Toledo, J. B., Zee, J., Wolk, D. A., Xie, S. X., Ou, Y., Shacklett, A., Parmpi, P., Shaw, L., Trojanowski, J. Q., & Davatzikos, C. (2014). Integration and relative value of biomarkers for prediction of MCI to AD progression: spatial patterns of brain atrophy, cognitive scores, APOE genotype and CSF biomarkers. NeuroImage: Clinical, 4, 164–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dai, W., Yang, Q., Xue, G., Yu, Y. (2007). Boosting for transfer learning. Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning, 193–200.Google Scholar
  18. Davatzikos, C., Bhatt, P., Shaw, L. M., Batmanghelich, K. N., & Trojanowski, J. Q. (2011). Prediction of MCI to AD conversion, via MRI, CSF biomarkers, and pattern classification. Neurobiology of Aging, 32, 2322.e2319–2322.e2327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. deToledo-Morrell, L., Stoub, T. R., Bulgakova, M., Wilson, R. S., Bennett, D. A., Leurgans, S., Wuu, J., & Turner, D. A. (2004). MRI-derived entorhinal volume is a good predictor of conversion from MCI to AD. Neurobiology of Aging, 25, 1197–1203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Drzezga, A., Lautenschlager, N., Siebner, H., Riemenschneider, M., Willoch, F., Minoshima, S., Schwaiger, M., & Kurz, A. (2003). Cerebral metabolic changes accompanying conversion of mild cognitive impairment into Alzheimer’s disease: a PET follow-up study. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 30, 1104–1113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Duan, L. X., Tsang, I. W., & Xu, D. (2012). Domain transfer multiple kernel learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 34, 465–479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Duchesne, S., & Mouiha, A. (2011). Morphological factor estimation via high-dimensional reduction: prediction of MCI conversion to probable AD. International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2011, 914085.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Eskildsen, S. F., Coupé, P., García-Lorenzo, D., Fonov, V., Pruessner, J. C., & Collins, D. L. (2013). Prediction of Alzheimer’s disease in subjects with mild cognitive impairment from the ADNI cohort using patterns of cortical thinning. NeuroImage, 65, 511–521.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fan, Y., Gur, R. E., Gur, R. C., Wu, X., Shen, D., Calkins, M. E., & Davatzikos, C. (2008). Unaffected family members and schizophrenia patients share brain structure patterns: a high-dimensional pattern classification study. Biological psychiatry, 63(1), 118–124.Google Scholar
  25. Fellgiebel, A., Scheurich, A., Bartenstein, P., & Muller, M. J. (2007). FDG-PET and CSF phospho-tau for prediction of cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 155, 167–171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Filipovych, R., Davatzikos, C., & A.D.N.I. (2011a). Semi-supervised pattern classification of medical images: application to mild cognitive impairment (MCI). NeuroImage, 55, 1109–1119.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Filipovych, R., Resnick, S. M., & Davatzikos, C. (2011b). Semi-supervised cluster analysis of imaging data. NeuroImage, 54, 2185–2197.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hinrichs, C., Singh, V., Xu, G. F., Johnson, S. C., & A.D.N.I. (2011). Predictive markers for AD in a multi-modality framework: an analysis of MCI progression in the ADNI population. NeuroImage, 55, 574–589.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hurd, M. D., Martorell, P., Delavande, A., Mullen, K. J., & Langa, K. M. (2013). Monetary costs of dementia in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 1326–1334.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jie, B., Zhang, D., Cheng, B., & Shen, D. (2015). Manifold regularized multitask feature learning for multimodality disease classification. Human Brain Mapping, 36(2), 489–507.Google Scholar
  31. Jie, B., Zhang, D., Wee, C. Y., Shen, D. (2014). Topological graph kernel on multiple thresholded functional connectivity networks for mild cognitive impairment classification. Human Brain Mapping 35(7), 2876–2897.Google Scholar
  32. Kabani, N., MacDonald, D., Holmes, C. J., & Evans, A. (1998). A 3D atlas of the human brain. NeuroImage, 7, S717.Google Scholar
  33. Kuzborskij, I., Orabona, F. (2013). Stability and hypothesis transfer learning. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning.Google Scholar
  34. Lehmann, M., Koedam, E. L., Barnes, J., Bartlett, J. W., Barkhof, F., Wattjes, M. P., Schott, J. M., Scheltens, P., Fox, N. C. (2012). Visual ratings of atrophy in MCI: prediction of conversion and relationship with CSF biomarkers. Neurobiology of Aging, 34, 73-82.Google Scholar
  35. Leung, K. K., Shen, K.-K., Barnes, J., Ridgway, G. R., Clarkson, M. J., Fripp, J., Salvado, O., Meriaudeau, F., Fox, N. C., Bourgeat, P., & Ourselin, S. (2010). Increasing power to predict mild cognitive impairment conversion to Alzheimer’s disease using hippocampal atrophy rate and statistical shape models. Proceeding of International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 13, 125–132.Google Scholar
  36. Li, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, G., Shi, F., Zhou, L., Lin, W., Shen, D., & A. D. N. I. (2012). Discriminant analysis of longitudinal cortical thickness changes in Alzheimer's disease using dynamic and network features. Neurobiology of Aging, 33(2), 427.e15–30.Google Scholar
  37. Misra, C., Fan, Y., & Davatzikos, C. (2009). Baseline and longitudinal patterns of brain atrophy in MCI patients, and their use in prediction of short-term conversion to AD: results from ADNI. NeuroImage, 44, 1415–1422.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mosconi, L., Perani, D., Sorbi, S., Herholz, K., Nacmias, B., Holthoff, V., Salmon, E., Baron, J. C., De Cristofaro, M. T., Padovani, A., Borroni, B., Franceschi, M., Bracco, L., & Pupi, A. (2004). MCI conversion to dementia and the APOE genotype: a prediction study with FDG-PET. Neurology, 63, 2332–2340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. A. (2010). A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22, 1345–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Risacher, S. L., Saykin, A. J., West, J. D., Shen, L., Firpi, H. A., & McDonald, B. C. (2009). Baseline MRI predictors of conversion from MCI to probable AD in the ADNI cohort. Current Alzheimer Research, 6, 347–361.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Shen, D., & Davatzikos, C. (2002). HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21, 1421–1439.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sled, J. G., Zijdenbos, A. P., & Evans, A. C. (1998). A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 17, 87–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Supekar, K., Menon, V., Rubin, D., Musen, M., & Greicius, M. D. (2008). Network analysis of intrinsic functional brain connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS Computational Biology, 4, e1000100.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Vemuri, P., Wiste, H. J., Weigand, S. D., Shaw, L. M., Trojanowski, J. Q., Weiner, M. W., Knopman, D. S., Petersen, R. C., Jack, C. R., & A.D.N.I. (2009a). MRI and CSF biomarkers in normal, MCI, and AD subjects diagnostic discrimination and cognitive correlations. Neurology, 73, 287–293.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Vemuri, P., Wiste, H. J., Weigand, S. D., Shaw, L. M., Trojanowski, J. Q., Weiner, M. W., Knopman, D. S., Petersen, R. C., Jack, C. R., & Initia, A. D. N. (2009b). MRI and CSF biomarkers in normal, MCI, and AD subjects predicting future clinical change. Neurology, 73, 294–301.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang, K., Liang, M., Wang, L., Tian, L., Zhang, X., Li, K., & Jiang, T. (2007). Altered functional connectivity in early Alzheimer’s disease: a resting-state fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 967–978.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang, Y., Nie, J., Yap, P.-T., Shi, F., Guo, L., & Shen, D. (2011a). Robust deformable-surface-based skull-stripping for large-scale studies. In G. Fichtinger, A. Martel, & T. Peters (Eds.), Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (pp. 635–642). Toronto: Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  48. Wang, H., Nie, F., Huang, H., Risacher, S., Saykin, A. J., Shen, L., & A.D.N.I. (2011b). Identifying AD-sensitive and cognition-relevant imaging biomarkers via joint classification and regression. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI, 14, 115–123.Google Scholar
  49. Wee, C. Y., Yap, P. T., Zhang, D., Denny, K., Browndykec, J. N., Potterd, G. G., Welsh-Bohmerc, K. A., Wang, L., & Shen, D. (2012). Identification of MCI individuals using structural and functional connectivity networks. NeuroImage, 59, 2045–2056.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wee, C. Y., Yap, P. T., Shen, D. G., & ADNI. (2013). Prediction of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment using cortical morphological patterns. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 3411–3425.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wee, C. Y., Yap, P. T., Zhang, D., Wang, L., & Shen, D. (2014). Group-constrained sparse fMRI connectivity modeling for mild cognitive impairment identification. Brain Structure and Function, 219, 641–656.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Westman, E., Muehlboeck, J. S., & Simmons, A. (2012). Combining MRI and CSF measures for classification of Alzheimer’s disease and prediction of mild cognitive impairment conversion. NeuroImage, 62, 229–238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Yang, J., Yan, R., Hauptmann, A. G. (2007). Cross-domain video concept detection using adaptive SVMs. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Multimedia, 188–197.Google Scholar
  54. Yang, L., Hanneke, S., & Carbonell, J. (2013). A theory of transfer learning with applications to active learning. Machine Learning, 90, 161–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Young, J., Modat, M., Cardoso, M. J., Mendelson, A., Cash, D., & Ourselin, S. (2013). Accurate multimodal probabilistic prediction of conversion to Alzheimer’s disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. NeuroImage: Clinical, 2, 735–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang, D., Shen, D. (2011). Semi-supervised multimodal classification of Alzheimer’s disease. Proceeding of IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 1628–1631.Google Scholar
  57. Zhang, Y., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2001). Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation maximization algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 20, 45–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang, D., Wang, Y., Zhou, L., Yuan, H., Shen, D., & A.D.N.I. (2011). Multimodal classification of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. NeuroImage, 55, 856–867.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang, D., Shen, D., & A.D.N.I. (2012a). Predicting future clinical changes of MCI patients using longitudinal and multimodal biomarkers. PLoS One, 3, e33182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang, D., Shen, D., & A.D.N.I. (2012b). Multi-modal multi-task learning for joint prediction of multiple regression and classification variables in Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage, 59, 895–907.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhu, D., Li, K., Terry, D. P., Puente, A. N., Wang, L., Shen, D., Miller, L. S., & Liu, T. (2014). Connectome-scale assessments of structural and functional connectivity in MCI. Human Brain Mapping, 35, 2911–2923.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bo Cheng
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mingxia Liu
    • 1
    • 4
  • Heung-Il Suk
    • 5
  • Dinggang Shen
    • 2
    • 5
    Email author
  • Daoqiang Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
  1. 1.College of Computer Science and TechnologyNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Radiology and BRICUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.School of Computer Science and EngineeringChongqing Three Gorges UniversityChongqingChina
  4. 4.School of Information Science and TechnologyTaishan UniversityTaianChina
  5. 5.Department of Brain and Cognitive EngineeringKorea UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations