Abstract
Brain research is as complex as its subject. The myriad of behavioral, imaging, physiological, and neuropsychological disciplines each give very different perspectives of the working of the human brain. While collaborative approaches can drive insightful outcomes, collaboration is time-consuming, demanding and often not “perfect”. The future challenges lie in understanding how brain, function and mind relate to one another. This will require the different disciplines learning to understand each other’s languages and perspective, and recognizing and integrating the different ways of thinking that each use. Here, we outline a discussion framework through which collaborators can achieve a common understanding of the variables included in their experiments. Logical mapping of brain, mind and function can be accomplished through use of a common modeling language where variables are pre-defined in an agreed manner.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Casti, J. L. (1992). Reality rules: Picturing the world in mathematics. New York: J. Wiley.
Coltheart, M. (2006). What has functional neuroimaging told us about the mind (so far)? Cortex, 42, 323–331. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70358-7.
Coltheart, M. (2008). Brain imaging, connectionism and cognitive psychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 21–25. doi:10.1080/02643290342000159.
Douglas, R. J., & Martin, K. A. C. (2007). Mapping the matrix: the ways of neocortex. Neuron, 56, 226–238. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.017.
Driver, J., Haggard, P., & Shallice, T. (2007). Mental processes in the human brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 362, 757–760. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2085.
Duque, R. B., Ynalvez, M., Sooryamoorthy, R., Mbatia, P., Dzorgbo, D. B. S., & Shrum, W. (2005). Collaboration paradox: scientific productivity, the internet, and problems of research in developing areas. Social Studies of Science, 35, 755–785. doi:10.1177/0306312705053048.
Friston, K., Kilner, J., & Harrison, L. (2006). A free energy principle for the brain. Journal of Physiology Paris, 100, 70–87. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.10.001.
Rae, C. (2007). Piece of mind: full systems approach is required. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 167–168. doi:10.1017/S0140525X07001276.
Sotero, R. C., & Trujillo-Barreto, N. J. (2008). Biophysical model for integrating neuronal activity, EEG, fMRI and metabolism. NeuroImage, 39, 290–309. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.001.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support of the New South Wales Government, and NewSouth Global.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rae, C., Henry, R.G. Mind Meld: Collaborative Approaches to Understanding How We All Think. Brain Imaging and Behavior 2, 343–349 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-008-9036-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-008-9036-1