Literatur
Deng ZJ, Yin C, Cusano J, Abdul-Rassoul H, Curry EJ, Novikov D et al (2020) Outcomes and complications after primary arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral biceps tenodesis for superior labral anterior-posterior tears or biceps abnormalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 8:2325967120945322
Hartland AW, Islam R, Teoh KH, Rashid MS (2022) Clinical effectiveness of tenotomy versus tenodesis for long head of biceps pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 12:e61954
Zhu XM, Leroux T, Ben-David E, Dennis B, Gohal C, Kirsch JM et al (2021) A meta-analysis of level I evidence comparing tenotomy vs tenodesis in the management of long head of biceps pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 30:961–968
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
T. Babasiz und S. Geyer geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Additional information
QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Babasiz, T., Geyer, S. Arthroskopische suprapektorale vs. offene subpektorale Bizepssehnentenodese bei mittelfristig langer Nachbeobachtungszeit. Obere Extremität 18, 207–209 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-023-00756-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-023-00756-6