Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hat die späte operative Versorgung einer Akromioklavikulargelenksprengung Einfluss auf das Outcome und die Komplikationsrate?

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
Obere Extremität Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Boström Windhamre H, von Heideken J, Une-Larsson V et al (2022) No difference in clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up in patients with type III and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with hook plate or physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pleasant HF, Robinson PG, Robinson CM, Nicholson JA (2022) Delayed acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using a modern suspensory device does not increase the risk of fixation failure or major complications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 31:2570–2577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lädermann A, Denard PJ, Collin P et al (2021) Early and delayed acromioclavicular joint reconstruction provide equivalent outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 30:635–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.06.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dey Hazra RO, Hanhoff M, Kühnapfel A et al (2022) Superior clinical results for early arthroscopic treatment of grade IIIb and V acromioclavicular joint instability compared to delayed operative treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.11.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosso C, Martetschläger F, Saccomanno MF et al (2021) High degree of consensus achieved regarding diagnosis and treatment of acromioclavicular joint instability among ESA-ESSKA members. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29:2325–2332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06286-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tuecking LR, Erdle B, Bernstein A et al (2022) Ligamentous healing potential of the acromioclavicular ligament following acute anatomical reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142:2225–2234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03936-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maier D, Tuecking LR, Bernstein A et al (2020) The acromioclavicular ligament shows an early and dynamic healing response following acute traumatic rupture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03614-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dey Hazra RO, Blach RM, Ziert Y et al (2022) Are Patient-Reported Outcome Scores a Reasonable Substitute for Clinical Follow-up After Surgically Managed Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries? Orthop J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221094056

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gumina S, Carbone S, Postacchini F (2009) Scapular Dyskinesis and SICK Scapula Syndrome in Patients With Chronic Type III Acromioclavicular Dislocation. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg 25:40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2008.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alp Paksoy or Rony-Orijit Dey Hazra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paksoy, A., Dey Hazra, RO. Hat die späte operative Versorgung einer Akromioklavikulargelenksprengung Einfluss auf das Outcome und die Komplikationsrate?. Obere Extremität 18, 119–121 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-023-00742-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-023-00742-y

Navigation