Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Schulterprothesenimplantation nach Infektion: Was zeigen uns die DVSE Registerdaten?

Shoulder arthroplasty after postinfectious glenohumeral arthritis: What can we learn from the DVSE registry?

  • Übersicht
  • Published:
Obere Extremität Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die funktionellen Ergebnisse nach Schulterprothesenimplantation sind verhältnismäßig schlecht, wenn zuvor im betroffenen Gelenk eine Infektion vorlag. In der Literatur werden diesbezüglich hohe Revisionsraten von bis zu 30 % in kleinen Fallserien berichtet. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, das Schulterprothesenregister (SEPR) der D-A-CH Vereinigung für Schulter- und Ellbogenchirurgie e.V. (DVSE) diesbezüglich zu analysieren und die Patientengruppe mit sog. „Infektarthropathie“ mit Patienten ohne vorausgegangene Infektion zu vergleichen. 15.255 Patienten des SEPR aus den Jahren 2006–2022 wurden analysiert. Bei 140 Patienten (78 männlich, 62 weiblich, 61,3 ± 13 Jahre) lag in der Vorgeschichte eine Infektarthropathie vor. Die Männer dieser Gruppe waren um 3,7 Jahre jünger als Frauen. Der präoperative Constant-Score war nicht unterschiedlich: 24,7 vs. 22,8 (p= 0,38). Intraoperative Komplikationen traten bei Infektarthropathie in 5,9 % vs. 2,8 % in der Vergleichsgruppe (p= 0,0323) auf. Postoperative Komplikationen bei Infektarthropathie: 13,7 % vs. 4 % (p< 0,0001): Revisionsraten bei Infektarthropathie: 12,9 % vs. 1,6 % (p< 0,0001), tiefe Wundinfekte bei Infektarthropathie: 3,2 % vs. 0,2 % (p< 0,0001). Patienten mit Infektarthropathie sind zum Zeitpunkt einer schulterendoprothetischen Versorgung knapp 10 Jahre jünger und häufiger männlich als Patienten ohne Infekt in der Vorgeschichte. Darüber hinaus sind die intra- und postoperativen Komplikationen um den Faktor 2, bzw. Faktor 3,4 höher und die Revisionsrate ist um den Faktor 8 höher als bei Patienten ohne vorausgegangenen Infekt. Die Entwicklung eines postoperativen, tiefen Wundinfekts ist um den Faktor 16 höher als bei der Vergleichsgruppe.

Abstract

Functional outcomes are relatively poor when a shoulder prosthesis is implanted in a joint that has had a previous infection. High revision rates of approximately 30% in small case series are reported in the literature. The aim of this paper is to analyze the DVSE (“D-A-CH Vereinigung für Schulter- und Ellenbogenchirurgie”) shoulder prosthesis registry (SEPR) in this regard and to compare the patient group with infectious arthropathy with that without any known previous infection. A total of 15,255 patients from the SEPR from 2006–2022 were analyzed. A history of infectious arthropathy was present in 140 patients (78 males, 62 females, 61.3 ± 13 years). Males in this group were 3.7 years younger than females. Preoperative Constant score was not different: 24.7 vs. 22.8 (p = 0.38). Intraoperative complications in infectious arthropathy: 5.9% vs. 2.8% in the control group (p = 0.0323). Postoperative complications in infectious arthropathy: 13.7% vs. 4% (p < 0.0001); revision rates in infectious arthropathy 12.9% vs. 1.6% (p < 0.0001). Deep wound infections in infectious arthropathy 3.2% vs. 0.2% (p < 0.0001). Patients with infectious arthropathy are nearly 10 years younger at the time of shoulder arthroplasty and more likely to be male than patients without a history of infection. In addition, intraoperative and postoperative complications are higher by a factor of 2, and a factor of 3.4, respectively, and revision rates are higher by a factor of 8 than in patients without a history of infection. The development of postoperative deep wound infection is higher than in the control group by a factor of 16.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Kircher J, Ohly B, Fal MF, Magosch P, Mauch F (2021) Analysis of revision shoulder arthroplasty in the German nationwide registry from 2014 to 2018. JSES Int 5:382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2020.12.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rupp M, Lau E, Kurtz SM, Alt V (2020) Projections of primary TKA and THA in Germany from 2016 through 2040. Clin Orthop Relat Res 478:1622–1633. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001214

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lehtimaki K, Rasmussen JV, Mokka J, Salomonsson B, Hole R, Jensen SL, Aarimaa V (2018) Risk and risk factors for revision after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy and osteoarthritis: a nordic arthroplasty register association study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27:1596–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moeini S, Rasmussen JV, Salomonsson B, Domeij-Arverud E, Fenstad AM, Hole R, Jensen SL, Brorson S (2019) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has a higher risk of revision due to infection than anatomical shoulder arthroplasty: 17 730 primary shoulder arthroplasties from the nordic arthroplasty register association. Bone Joint J 101:702–707. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1348.R1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schoch B, Allen B, Mileti J, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2014) Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of postinfectious glenohumeral arthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23:1327–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mileti J, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2003) Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of postinfectious glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:609–614. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200304000-00004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kriechling P, Bouaicha S, Andronic O, Uckay I, Bock D, Wieser K (2021) Limited improvement and high rate of complication in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for previous native shoulder infection. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 30:34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Padegimas EM, Nicholson TA, Silva S, Ramsey ML, Williams GR, Lazarus MD, Namdari S (2018) Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty performed for postinfectious arthritis. Clin Orthop Surg 10:344–351. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2018.10.3.344

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pruijn N, van Diek FM, Meis JF, Kosse NM, Dorrestijn O (2021) Cutibacterium acnes infections in revision surgery for persistent shoulder complaints: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141:197–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03415-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hudek R, Brobeil A, Bruggemann H, Sommer F, Gattenlohner S, Gohlke F (2020) Cutibacterium acnes is an intracellular and intra-articular commensal of the human shoulder joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel A, Calfee RP, Plante M, Fischer SA, Green A (2009) Propionibacterium acnes colonization of the human shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:897–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hudek R, Sommer F, Abdelkawi AF, Kerwat M, Muller HH, Gohlke F (2016) Propionibacterium acnes in shoulder surgery: is loss of hair protective for infection? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Achermann Y, Goldstein EJ, Coenye T, Shirtliff ME (2014) Propionibacterium acnes: from commensal to opportunistic biofilm-associated implant pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:419–440. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00092-13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Roh M, Han M, Kim D, Chung K (2006) Sebum output as a factor contributing to the size of facial pores. Br J Dermatol 155:890–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07465.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lousada MB, Lachnit T, Edelkamp J, Paus R, Bosch TCG (2022) Hydra and the hair follicle—an unconventional comparative biology approach to exploring the human holobiont. Bioessays 44:e2100233. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jensen ML, Jensen SL, Bolder M, Hanisch KWJ, Sorensen AKB, Olsen BS, Falstie-Jensen T, Rasmussen JV (2023) Previous rotator cuff repair increases the risk of revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 32:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.07.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh JA, Sperling JW, Schleck C, Harmsen WS, Cofield RH (2012) Periprosthetic infections after total shoulder arthroplasty: a 33-year perspective. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:1534–1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.01.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Padegimas EM, Maltenfort M, Ramsey ML, Williams GR, Parvizi J, Namdari S (2015) Periprosthetic shoulder infection in the United States: incidence and economic burden. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:741–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.11.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gehrke AE, Mendoza-Bertelli A, Ledo C, Gonzalez CD, Noto Llana M, Blanco C, Sordelli DO, Putman NE, Cassat JE, Delpino MV et al (2022) Neutralization of staphylococcus aureus protein A prevents exacerbated osteoclast activity and bone loss during osteomyelitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01140-22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hudek R, Gohlke F (2013) Endoprosthesis infections of the shoulder: diagnosis and therapy algorithm. Orthopade 42:552–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-012-2026-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Werthel JD, Hatta T, Schoch B, Cofield R, Sperling JW, Elhassan BT (2017) Is previous nonarthroplasty surgery a risk factor for periprosthetic infection in primary shoulder arthroplasty? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26:635–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.10.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marigi E, Marigi I, Crowe MM, Ortiguera CJ, Ledford CK, Werthel JD, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Schoch BS (2021) Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with metabolic syndrome is associated with increased rates of deep infection. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 30:2032–2040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.12.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Both A, Klatte TO, Lubke A, Buttner H, Hartel MJ, Grossterlinden LG, Rohde H (2018) Growth of cutibacterium acnes is common on osteosynthesis material of the shoulder in patients without signs of infection. Acta Orthop 89:580–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1489095

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fischer N, Mak TN, Shinohara DB, Sfanos KS, Meyer TF, Bruggemann H (2013) Deciphering the Intracellular fate of propionibacterium acnes in macrophages. Biomed Res Int 2013:603046. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/603046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Hudek.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

R. Hudek, F. Kirchner, S. Albers, M. Farkhondeh Fal und J. Kircher geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hudek, R., Kirchner, F., Albers, S. et al. Schulterprothesenimplantation nach Infektion: Was zeigen uns die DVSE Registerdaten?. Obere Extremität 18, 67–73 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-023-00734-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-023-00734-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation