Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Langzeitresultate nach arthroskopischem SLAP-Repair

Long-term results after arthroscopic SLAP repair

  • Originalarbeit
  • Published:
Obere Extremität Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung

Eine zunehmende Anzahl operativ versorgter SLAP-Läsionen in der letzten Dekade fordert die Untersuchung langfristiger klinischer Resultate sowie die Herausarbeitung möglicher negativer prädiktiver Faktoren, die einen Einfluss auf das postoperative Outcome haben könnten.

Patienten und Methoden

Insgesamt 60 von 77 Patienten (Follow-up-Rate 78 %) konnten mit einer Nachbeobachtungsdauer von 57,7 Monate (Spannweite 26–94 Monate) mittels Constant-Murley Score (CMS), Rowe Score (RS) und Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) nachuntersucht werden. Es erfolgte eine Unterteilung der Patienten hinsichtlich Alter zum Zeitpunkt der Operation (OP), begleitender Rotatorenmanschetten (RM)-Pathologie, Vorliegen einer isolierten SLAP („superior labrum anterior to posterior“)-Läsion, Ätiologie der Verletzung sowie einer zum Zeitpunkt der OP arthroskopisch festgestellten Chondromalazie.

Ergebnisse

Der mediane adaptierte CMS lag bei 89 % (Spannweite 38–106 %). Im Durchschnitt wurde die Funktionsfähigkeit der operierten Schulter im SSV mit 90 % angegeben. Insgesamt 87 % der Patienten waren mit dem OP-Ergebnis sehr zufrieden oder zufrieden. Das Alter, Begleitläsionen im Allgemeinen sowie Läsionen der RM im Speziellen hatten in dieser Untersuchung keinen Einfluss auf das postoperative Resultat. Patienten mit intraoperativ vorbestehendem Chondralschaden bewerteten die Funktionsfähigkeit ihrer Schulter im Rahmen des SSV signifikant (p = 0,0221) schlechter. Im absoluten und alterskorrelierten CMS (p = 0,0104) und im SSV (p = 0,0418) zeigten Patienten mit ätiologisch ursächlichem Trauma signifikant höhere Werte als Patienten der Gruppe ohne ursächliches Trauma.

Diskussion

Klinische Resultate nach Rekonstruktion der SLAP-Läsion sind im Langzeitverlauf über durchschnittlich 5 Jahre stabil. Als prädiktive Faktoren für ein schlechteres postoperatives Outcome lassen sich die degenerative und rezidivierend mikrotraumatische Ätiologie sowie eine vorbestehende Knorpelschädigung darstellen.

Abstract

Introduction

The increasing number of surgically treated superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions in the past decade calls for an investigation of the long-term clinical results and assessment of possible predictive factors that could have an influence on the postoperative outcome.

Patients and methods

Out of 77 patients 60 were treated surgically with arthroscopic SLAP repair. Of these 78 % of the patients were available at final follow-up and the mean duration of follow-up was 57.7 months (range 26−94 months). All patients were followed up clinically by evaluation of the Constant-Murley (CMS), Rowe (RS) and the subjective shoulder value (SSV) scores. Patients were subdivided according to age at time of surgery, concomitant rotator cuff pathology, existing isolated SLAP lesions, existing accompanying injury, etiology of injury and pre-existing cartilage lesion at the time of surgery.

Results

The median age and gender-adjusted CMS was 89 % (range 38–106 %). The average functionality of the operated shoulder in SSV was 90 % and 87 % of patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the clinical outcome. Both the age and generally accompanying lesions and in particular partial lesions of the rotator cuff had no effect on the postoperative outcome. Pre-existing cartilage lesions resulted in significantly lower functionality of the shoulder as part of the SSV (p = 0.0221).Both absolute and age and gender-related CMS (p = 0.0104) and SSV (p = 0.0418) were significantly higher in the posttraumatic group than the group with degenerative etiology.

Discussion

Clinical results after arthroscopic repair of SLAP lesions are stable in an average long-term of approximately 5 years. The degenerative and recurrent microtraumatic etiology and pre-existing cartilage damage can be predictive factors for a worse postoperative outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Abbot AE, Li X, Busconi BD (2009) Arthroscopic treatment of concomitant superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions and rotator cuff tears in patients over the age of 45 years. Am J Sports Med 37:1358–1362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Altchek DW, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Altchek DW, Cordasco FA, Allen AA; Hospital for Special Surgery Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service. (1992) Arthroscopic labral debridement. A three-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 20:702–706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews JR, Carson WG Jr, Mcleod WD (1985) Glenoid labrum tears related to the long head of the biceps. Am J Sports Med 13:337–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett WF (2009) Correlation of the SLAP lesion with lesions of the medial sheath of the biceps tendon and intra-articular subscapularis tendon. Indian J Orthop 43:342–346

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boileau P, Parratte S, Chuinard C, Roussanne Y, Shia D, Bicknell R (2009) Arthroscopic treatment of isolated type II SLAP lesions: biceps tenodesis as an alternative to reinsertion. Am J Sports Med 37:929–936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brockmeier SF, Voos JE, Williams RJ 3rd, Altchek DW, Cordasco FA, Allen AA; Hospital for Special Surgery Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service (2009) Outcomes after arthroscopic repair of type-II SLAP lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1595–1603

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Kallmes D (2009) Vertebroplasty appears no better than placebo for painful osteoporotic spinal fractures, and has potential to cause harm. Med J Aust 191:476–477

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Byram IR, Dunn WR, Kuhn JE (2011) Humeral head abrasion: an association with failed superior labrum anterior posterior repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20:92–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Coleman SH, Cohen DB, Drakos MC, Allen AA, Williams RJ, O’Brien SJ, Altchek DW, Warren RF (2007) Arthroscopic repair of type II superior labral anterior posterior lesions with and without acromioplasty: a clinical analysis of 50 patients. Am J Sports Med 35:749–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Conway JE (2001) Arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears and SLAP lesions in professional baseball players. Orthop Clin North Am 32:443–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cordasco FA, Steinmann S, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU (1993) Arthroscopic treatment of glenoid labral tears. Am J Sports Med 21:425–430 (discussion 430–421)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Denard PJ, Ladermann A, Burkhart SS (2012) Long-term outcome after arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions: results according to age and workers’ compensation status. Arthroscopy 28:451–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Felson DT, Buckwalter J (2002) Debridement and lavage for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 347:132–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Forsythe B, Guss D, Anthony SG, Martin SD (2011) Concomitant arthroscopic SLAP and rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1362–1369

    Google Scholar 

  15. Franceschi F, Longo UG, Ruzzini L, Rizzello G, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2008) No advantages in repairing a type II superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesion when associated with rotator cuff repair in patients over age 50: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 36:247–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gorantla K, Gill C, Wright RW (2010) The outcome of type II SLAP repair: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 26:537–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kallmes D, Buchbinder R, Jarvik J, Heagerty P, Comstock B, Turner J, Osborne R (2009) Response to „randomized vertebroplasty trials: bad news or sham news?“. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1809–1810

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kanatli U, Ozturk BY, Bolukbasi S (2011) Arthroscopic repair of type  II superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions in patients over the age of 45 years: a prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:1107–1113

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kim SH, Ha KI, Choi HJ (2002) Results of arthroscopic treatment of superior labral lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:981–985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuhn JE, Lindholm SR, Huston LJ, Soslowsky LJ, Blasier RB (2003) Failure of the biceps superior labral complex: a cadaveric biomechanical investigation comparing the late cocking and early deceleration positions of throwing. Arthroscopy 19:373–379

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lehmann LJ, Dinter D, Monateseri S, Scharf HP, Weckbach S (2009) [Osteoarthritis after SLAP lesion? Clinical and arthro-MRI evaluation after arthroscopic SLAP refixation]. Sportverletz Sportschaden 23:155–160

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lehmann LJ, Moursy M, Lederer C (2012) [Is the patient age a negative predictive factor in the reconstruction of SLAP lesions?]. Sportverletz Sportschaden 26:109–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mileski RA, Snyder SJ (1998) Superior labral lesions in the shoulder: pathoanatomy and surgical management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 6:121–131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nam EK, Snyder SJ (2003) The diagnosis and treatment of superior labrum, anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions. Am J Sports Med 31:798–810

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Onyekwelu I, Khatib O, Zuckerman JD, Rokito AS, Kwon YW (2012) The rising incidence of arthroscopic superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:728–731

    Google Scholar 

  26. Osti L, Soldati F, Cheli A, Pari C, Massari L, Maffulli N (2012) Biceps instability and Slap type II tear in overhead athletes. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2:258–266

    Google Scholar 

  27. Park JH, Lee YS, Wang JH, Noh HK, Kim JG (2008) Outcome of the isolated SLAP lesions and analysis of the results according to the injury mechanisms. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:511–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Patzer T, Kircher J, Lichtenberg S, Sauter M, Magosch P, Habermeyer P (2011) Is there an association between SLAP lesions and biceps pulley lesions? Arthroscopy 27:611–618

    Google Scholar 

  29. Patzer T, Lichtenberg S, Kircher J, Magosch P, Habermeyer P (2010) Influence of SLAP lesions on chondral lesions of the glenohumeral joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:982–987

    Google Scholar 

  30. Payne LZ, Jokl P (1993) The results of arthroscopic debridement of glenoid labral tears based on tear location. Arthroscopy 9:560–565

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schroder CP, Skare O, Gjengedal E, Uppheim G, Reikerås O, Brox JI (2012) Long-term results after SLAP repair: a 5-year follow-up study of 107 patients with comparison of patients aged over and under 40 years. Arthroscopy 28:1601–1607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Skare O, Schroder CP, Reikeras O, Mowinckel P, Brox JI (2010) Efficacy of labral repair, biceps tenodesis, and diagnostic arthroscopy for SLAP lesions of the shoulder: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:228

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Snyder SJ, Karzel RP, Del Pizzo W, Ferkel RD, Friedman MJ (1990) SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 6:274–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Snyder SJ, Banas MP, Karzel RP (1995) An analysis of 140 injuries to the superior glenoid labrum. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4:243–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang AL, Kreulen C, Ngo SS, Hame SL, Wang JC, Gamradt SC (2012) Demographic trends in arthroscopic SLAP repair in the United States. Am J Sports Med 40:1144–1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt

L. J. Lehmann, M. Moursy, K. Cafaltzis und C. Lederer geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Die Ethikkommission der Fakultät prüfte und genehmigte das Studienprotokoll. Ziele und Durchführung der Studie wurden den Patienten eingehend erläutert. Alle an der Studie beteiligten Patienten gaben eine schriftliche Einverständniserklärung ab.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Johannes Lehmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehmann, L., Moursy, M., Cafaltzis, K. et al. Langzeitresultate nach arthroskopischem SLAP-Repair. Obere Extremität 9, 38–44 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-014-0246-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-014-0246-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation