Abstract
α-diversity describes species diversity at local scales. The Simpson’s and Shannon–Wiener indices are widely used to characterize α-diversity based on species abundances within a fixed study site (e.g., a quadrat or plot). Although such indices provide overall diversity estimates that can be analyzed, their values are not spatially continuous nor applicable in theory to any point within the study region, and thus they cannot be treated as spatial covariates for analyses of other variables. Herein, we extended the Simpson’s and Shannon–Wiener indices to create point estimates of α-diversity for any location based on spatially explicit species occurrences within different bandwidths (i.e., radii, with the location of interest as the center). For an arbitrary point in the study region, species occurrences within the circle plotting the bandwidth were weighted according to their distance from the center using a tri-cube kernel function, with occurrences closer to the center having greater weight than more distant ones. These novel kernel-based α-diversity indices were tested using a tree dataset from a 400 m × 400 m study region comprising a 200 m × 200 m core region surrounded by a 100-m width buffer zone. Our newly extended α-diversity indices did not disagree qualitatively with the traditional indices, and the former were slightly lower than the latter by < 2% at medium and large bandwidths. The present work demonstrates the feasibility of using kernel-based α-diversity indices to estimate diversity at any location in the study region and allows them to be used as quantifiable spatial covariates or predictors for other dependent variables of interest in future ecological studies. Spatially continuous α-diversity indices are useful to compare and monitor species trends in space and time, which is valuable for conservation practitioners.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The forest survey data are accessible in Dryad, an online repository at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.h9w0vt4np.
References
Arrhenius O (1921) Species and area. J Ecol 9:95–99
Baddeley A, Diggle PJ, Hardegen A, Lawrence T, Milne RK, Nair G (2014) On tests of spatial pattern based on simulation envelopes. Ecol Monogr 84:477–489
Baddeley A, Rubak E, Turner R (2015) Spatial point patterns: methodology and applications with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London
Bates DM, Watts DG (1988) Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. Wiley, New York
Connor EF, McCoy ED (1979) The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. Am Nat 113:791–833
Féret JB, de Boissieu F (2020) biodivMapR: An R package for α- and β-diversity mapping using remotely sensed images. Methods Ecol Evol 11:64–70
Gazol A, Tamme R, Price JN, Hiiesalu I, Laanisto L, Pärtel M (2013) A negative heterogeneity-diversity relationship found in experimental grassland communities. Oecologia 173:545–555
Gorelick R (2006) Combining richness and abundance into a single diversity index using matrix analogues of Shannon’s and Simpson’s indices. Ecography 29:525–530
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, 2nd edn. Springer, New, York
Keylock CJ (2005) Simpson diversity and the Shannon–Wiener index as special cases of a generalized entropy. Oikos 109:203–207
Kwiatkowska AJ, Symonides E (1986) Spatial distribution of species diversity indices and their correlation with plot size. Vegetatio 68:99–102
Lee CB, Chun JH (2015) Patterns and determinants of plant richness by elevation in a mountain ecosystem in South Korea: area, mid-domain effect, climate and productivity. J for Res 26:905–917
MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press
Morris DW, Davidson DL, Krebs CJ (2000) Measuring the ghost of competition: insights from density-dependent habitat selection on the co-existence and dynamics of lemmings. Evol Ecol Res 2:41–67
Murphy SJ, Wiegand T, Comita LS (2017) Distance-dependent seedling mortality and long-term spacing dynamics in a neotropical forest community. Ecol Lett 20:1469–1478
R Core Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 01 June 2022
Sabatini FM, Jimenez-Alfaro B, Jandt U, Chytry M, Field R, Kessler M, Bruelheide H (2022) Global patterns of vascular plant alpha diversity. Nat Commun 13(1):4683
Sandhu HS, Shi PJ, Yang QP (2013) Intraspecific spatial niche differentiation: evidence from Phyllostachys edulis. Acta Ecol Sin 33:287–292
Schrader J, Moeljono S, Keppel G, Kreft H (2019) Plants on small islands revisited: the effects of spatial scale and habitat quality on the species–area relationship. Ecography 42(8):1405–1414
Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(379–423):623–656
Shi PJ, Hui C, Men XY, Zhao ZH, Ouyang F, Cao HF, Jin XS, Ge F, Li BL (2014) Cascade effects of crop species richness on the diversity of pest insects and their natural enemies. China Life Sci 57:718–725
Shi PJ, Gao J, Song ZP, Liu YH, Hui C (2018) Spatial segregation facilitates the coexistence of tree species in temperate forests. Forests 9:768
Shi PJ, Ridland PM, Ratkowsky DA, Li Y (2022) IPEC: root mean square curvature calculation. R package version 1.0.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=IPEC. Accessed 01 June 2022
Shi PJ, Quinn BK, Chen L, Gao J, Schrader J (2023) Forest survey data of a landscape in Pine Mountain, Dryad, Dataset. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.h9w0vt4np. Accessed 10 April 2023
Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688
Thompson CJ, Lee TE, McCarthy MA (2014) Species distributions and area relationships. J Theor Biol 363:129–133
Tjørve E, Matthews TJ, Whittaker RJ (2021) The history of the species-area relationship. In: Matthews TJ, Triantis KA, Whittaker RJ (eds) The species-area relationship: theory and application. Cambridge University Press
Triantis KA, Guilhaumon F, Whittaker RJ (2012) The island species-area relationship: biology and statistics. J Biogeogr 39:215–231
Türkiş S, Elmas E (2018) Effect of environmental factors on species diversity of the Yenice Hot Spot Forests in Turkey. J for Res 29:1719–1730
Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30:279–338
Wiegand T, Gunatilleke CVS, Gunatillke IAUN, Huth A (2007) How individual species structure diversity in tropical forests. PNAS 104:19029–19033
Zahl S (1977) Jackknifing an index of diversity. Ecology 58:907–913
Zhang BS, Dong XB, Qu HF, Gao R, Mao LL (2023) Effects of thinning on ecosystem carbon storage and tree-shrub-herb diversity of a low-quality secondary forest in NE China. J for Res 34:977–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-022-01531-z
Zheng YW, Dai CZ, Su XF, Zhang X, Zhou MY, Shi PJ (2022) Spatial competitive relationship between Phyllostachys iridescens and Phyllostachys mannii. J West China for Sci 51(4):54–61 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Acknowledgements
We thank Cang Hui, Meng Lian, Yanhong Liu, and Lin Wang for their valuable help during the preparation of this manuscript. We are also grateful to three anonymous expert reviewers for their constructive and valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Project funding: Jie Gao was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2022D01A213).
The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com.
Corresponding editor: Tao Xu.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shi, P., Quinn, B.K., Chen, L. et al. Quantifying α-diversity as a continuous function of location—a case study of a temperate forest. J. For. Res. 34, 1683–1691 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-023-01642-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-023-01642-1